Cooperation, ethnic salience and generalization of interethnic attitudes

This study compared the effectiveness of three theoretically-based conditions of intergroup cooperation in bringing about generalization of ethnic outgroup attitudes from a cooperation partner to the outgroup as a whole. Twenty-seven pairs of Dutch secondary school pupils were assigned at random to work together in triads to solve two word puzzles. The triads consisted of one Turkish pupil, always a confederate, and two Dutch pupils. The three conditions varied according to whether reference was made to the ethnic background of the confederate in both an introductory conversation and in the conversation-break between puzzles (High-High salience); only in the later break (Low-High); or not at all (Low-Low). Results show no differences between conditions in attitudes towards the partner, which were quite positive. However, attitude change only generalized in the two conditions in which ethnic membership was made salient (Low-High and High-High, which did not differ). These findings are discussed in terms of different models of intergroup contact, and how contact may actually work.

[1]  Norman Miller,et al.  Contact and Cooperation , 1988 .

[2]  O. John,et al.  Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. , 1985 .

[3]  L. Hagendoorn,et al.  Contextual aspects of ethnic stereotypes and interethnic evaluations , 1991 .

[4]  E. Aronson.  The Jigsaw Classroom , 1978 .

[5]  C. G. Lord,et al.  Previous conceptions of the typical group member and the contact hypothesis , 1992 .

[6]  B. Ann Bettencourt,et al.  Cooperation and the reduction of intergroup bias: The role of reward structure and social orientation ☆ , 1992 .

[7]  J. Crocker,et al.  Cognitive Processes in the Revision of Stereotypic Beliefs , 1983 .

[8]  Robert Folger,et al.  Intergroup cooperation and intergroup attraction: The effect of previous interaction and outcome of combined effort , 1977 .

[9]  David A. Wilder,et al.  Intergroup contact: The typical member and the exception to the rule , 1984 .

[10]  M. Hewstone,et al.  COGNITIVE MODELS OF STEREOTYPE CHANGE .3. SUBTYPING AND THE PERCEIVED TYPICALITY OF DISCONFIRMING GROUP MEMBERS , 1992 .

[11]  S. Cook,et al.  8 – Cooperative Interaction in Multiethnic Contexts* , 1984 .

[12]  G. Āllport.  The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[13]  M. Brewer,et al.  13 – Beyond the Contact Hypothesis: Theoretical Perspectives on Desegregation , 1984 .

[14]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Cooperative learning: Applying contact theory in desegregated schools. , 1985 .

[15]  H. Tajfel.  Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[16]  Helen M. Wolfle,et al.  Available internships in psychology. , 1948 .

[17]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the 'contact hypothesis.' , 1986 .

[18]  M. Brewer.  A dual process model of impression formation. , 1988 .

[19]  M. Hewstone.  Revision and Change of Stereotypic Beliefs: In Search of the Elusive Subtyping Model , 1994 .

[20]  C. N. Macrae,et al.  Cognitive models of stereotype change: (5). Measurement, development, and consequences of subtyping , 1994 .

[21]  S. Cook,et al.  The field of action research. , 2011, The American psychologist.

[22]  M. Brewer,et al.  Cooperative Interaction in Desegregated Settings: A Laboratory Analogue , 1985 .

[23]  D A Wilder,et al.  Role of competition-induced anxiety in limiting the beneficial impact of positive behavior by an out-group member. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[25]  Kurt Lewin,et al.  Conduct, Knowledge, and Acceptance of New Values , 1945 .

[26]  Miles Hewstone,et al.  Dimensions of Contact as Predictors of Intergroup Anxiety, Perceived Out-Group Variability, and Out-Group Attitude: An Integrative Model , 1993 .

[27]  Y. Amir,et al.  Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.