The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth
暂无分享,去创建一个
While avoiding relativism, Rorty claims that: (1) truth is just for a time and a place; (2) ‘truth’ and ‘rationality’ are indexed to a community's standards of warranted assertibility; and (3) there is nothing more to be said about truth and rationality than is contained, in a community's procedures for evaluating claims. He makes these assertions because he believes that the cautionary uses of ‘true’ and ‘rational’ crucially depend upon the endorsing uses of these terms. I argue that Rorty is wrong in this belief and that the principle of charity assures us that in their cautionary uses ‘true’ and ‘rational’ are independent of any idiosyncracies associated with any community's current standards of justification.
[1] R. Brandom. Heidegger’s Categories in Being and Time , 1983 .
[2] Relativism, Context, and Truth , 1984 .
[3] Objectivity, relativism, and truth: Representation, social practise, and truth , 1990 .
[4] Stephen Mulhall,et al. Truth in Philosophy. , 1993 .
[5] R. Rorty. Putnam and the Relativist Menace , 1993 .