The quest for interpretable models of neural population activity

Many aspects of brain function arise from the coordinated activity of large populations of neurons. Recent developments in neural recording technologies are providing unprecedented access to the activity of such populations during increasingly complex experimental contexts; however, extracting scientific insights from such recordings requires the concurrent development of analytical tools that relate this population activity to system-level function. This is a primary motivation for latent variable models, which seek to provide a low-dimensional description of population activity that can be related to experimentally controlled variables, as well as uncontrolled variables such as internal states (e.g. attention and arousal) and elements of behavior. While deriving an understanding of function from traditional latent variable methods relies on low-dimensional visualizations, new approaches are targeting more interpretable descriptions of the components underlying system-level function.

[1]  Stefano Fusi,et al.  Why neurons mix: high dimensionality for higher cognition , 2016, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[2]  Z. Mainen,et al.  Distinct Sources of Deterministic and Stochastic Components of Action Timing Decisions in Rodent Frontal Cortex , 2016, Neuron.

[3]  M. Sahani,et al.  State-Dependent Population Coding in Primary Auditory Cortex , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Christian Ethier,et al.  Cortical population activity within a preserved neural manifold underlies multiple motor behaviors , 2018, Nature Communications.

[5]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  Estimating a State-space Model from Point Process Observations Emery N. Brown , 2022 .

[6]  Shreya Saxena,et al.  Towards the neural population doctrine , 2019, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  Maneesh Sahani,et al.  Recurrent linear models of simultaneously-recorded neural populations , 2013, NIPS.

[8]  Sergey L. Gratiy,et al.  Fully integrated silicon probes for high-density recording of neural activity , 2017, Nature.

[9]  Matthew R Whiteway,et al.  Revealing unobserved factors underlying cortical activity using a rectified latent variable model applied to neural population recordings , 2016, bioRxiv.

[10]  Chethan Pandarinath,et al.  Inferring single-trial neural population dynamics using sequential auto-encoders , 2017 .

[11]  Maneesh Sahani,et al.  Learning interpretable continuous-time models of latent stochastic dynamical systems , 2019, ICML.

[12]  Nicholas A. Steinmetz,et al.  Diverse coupling of neurons to populations in sensory cortex , 2015, Nature.

[13]  Konrad P. Körding,et al.  Modern Machine Learning as a Benchmark for Fitting Neural Responses , 2018, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[14]  Mónica F. Bugallo,et al.  Tree-Structured Recurrent Switching Linear Dynamical Systems for Multi-Scale Modeling , 2018, ICLR.

[15]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Slow gain fluctuations limit benefits of temporal integration in visual cortex , 2018, Journal of vision.

[16]  Rishidev Chaudhuri,et al.  The population dynamics of a canonical cognitive circuit , 2019, bioRxiv.

[17]  Theodore H. Lindsay,et al.  Global Brain Dynamics Embed the Motor Command Sequence of Caenorhabditis elegans , 2015, Cell.

[18]  L. Paninski Maximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models , 2004, Network.

[19]  Surya Ganguli,et al.  On simplicity and complexity in the brave new world of large-scale neuroscience , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[20]  David Sussillo,et al.  Neural circuits as computational dynamical systems , 2014, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[21]  Scott W. Linderman,et al.  Using computational theory to constrain statistical models of neural data , 2017, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[22]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  On the Structure of Neuronal Population Activity under Fluctuations in Attentional State , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Bruce G Cumming,et al.  Variability and Correlations in Primary Visual Cortical Neurons Driven by Fixational Eye Movements , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Kevin L. Briggman,et al.  Optical Imaging of Neuronal Populations During Decision-Making , 2005, Science.

[25]  John P. Cunningham,et al.  Empirical models of spiking in neural populations , 2011, NIPS.

[26]  Jakob H. Macke,et al.  Low-dimensional models of neural population activity in sensory cortical circuits , 2014, NIPS.

[27]  V. Jayaraman,et al.  Intensity versus Identity Coding in an Olfactory System , 2003, Neuron.

[28]  John P. Cunningham,et al.  Gaussian-process factor analysis for low-dimensional single-trial analysis of neural population activity , 2008, NIPS.

[29]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  Using Matrix and Tensor Factorizations for the Single-Trial Analysis of Population Spike Trains , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[30]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Dimensionality reduction for large-scale neural recordings , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Jonathan W. Pillow,et al.  Single-trial spike trains in parietal cortex reveal discrete steps during decision-making , 2015, Science.

[32]  John P. Cunningham,et al.  Dynamical segmentation of single trials from population neural data , 2011, NIPS.

[33]  M. Vinck,et al.  Arousal and locomotion make distinct contributions to cortical activity patterns and visual encoding , 2014, bioRxiv.

[34]  J. Waters,et al.  Neuromodulatory Correlates of Pupil Dilation , 2018, Front. Neural Circuits.

[35]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  Attentional fluctuations induce shared variability in macaque primary visual cortex , 2017, bioRxiv.

[36]  Kenneth D. Harris,et al.  High-dimensional geometry of population responses in visual cortex , 2019, Nat..

[37]  Lee E. Miller,et al.  Neural Manifolds for the Control of Movement , 2017, Neuron.

[38]  Yuwei Cui,et al.  Inferring Cortical Variability from Local Field Potentials , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Amy M. Ni,et al.  Learning and attention reveal a general relationship between population activity and behavior , 2018, Science.

[40]  Devika Narain,et al.  Flexible Sensorimotor Computations through Rapid Reconfiguration of Cortical Dynamics , 2018, Neuron.

[41]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Cortical Areas Interact through a Communication Subspace , 2019, Neuron.

[42]  Jan Drugowitsch,et al.  Multiplicative and Additive Modulation of Neuronal Tuning with Population Activity Affects Encoded Information , 2016, Neuron.

[43]  Nicholas A. Steinmetz,et al.  Spontaneous behaviors drive multidimensional, brainwide activity , 2019, Science.

[44]  Karel Svoboda,et al.  An orderly single-trial organization of population dynamics in premotor cortex predicts behavioral variability , 2018, bioRxiv.

[45]  John P. Cunningham,et al.  A Novel Variational Family for Hidden Nonlinear Markov Models , 2018, ArXiv.

[46]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Computing by Robust Transience: How the Fronto-Parietal Network Performs Sequential, Category-Based Decisions , 2017, Neuron.

[47]  John P. Cunningham,et al.  Tensor Analysis Reveals Distinct Population Structure that Parallels the Different Computational Roles of Areas M1 and V1 , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[48]  Matthew T. Kaufman,et al.  Single-trial neural dynamics are dominated by richly varied movements , 2019, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  Matthew T. Kaufman,et al.  Neural population dynamics during reaching , 2012, Nature.

[50]  Devika Narain,et al.  Flexible timing by temporal scaling of cortical responses , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Population activity structure of excitatory and inhibitory neurons , 2017, PloS one.

[52]  Naoshige Uchida,et al.  Demixed principal component analysis of neural population data , 2014, eLife.

[53]  J. DiCarlo,et al.  Using goal-driven deep learning models to understand sensory cortex , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[54]  Lee E. Miller,et al.  A neural population mechanism for rapid learning , 2017 .

[55]  Steven M. Peterson,et al.  A spatiotemporal coding mechanism for background-invariant odor recognition , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  Adrian G Bondy,et al.  Feedback Determines the Structure of Correlated Variability in Primary Visual Cortex , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[57]  Philipp J. Keller,et al.  Whole-brain functional imaging at cellular resolution using light-sheet microscopy , 2013, Nature Methods.

[58]  Jonathan W. Pillow,et al.  Model-based targeted dimensionality reduction for neuronal population data , 2018, NeurIPS.

[59]  L .Paninski,et al.  Neural data science: accelerating the experiment-analysis-theory cycle in large-scale neuroscience , 2017, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[60]  Yuan Zhao,et al.  Interpretable Nonlinear Dynamic Modeling of Neural Trajectories , 2016, NIPS.

[61]  W. Newsome,et al.  Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex , 2013, Nature.

[62]  Hansjörg Scherberger,et al.  Neural Population Dynamics during Reaching Are Better Explained by a Dynamical System than Representational Tuning , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[63]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  State Dependence of Noise Correlations in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex , 2014, Neuron.

[64]  Konrad P Kording,et al.  How advances in neural recording affect data analysis , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[65]  David Sussillo,et al.  Opening the Black Box: Low-Dimensional Dynamics in High-Dimensional Recurrent Neural Networks , 2013, Neural Computation.

[66]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Partitioning neuronal variability , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[67]  Stefan R. Pulver,et al.  Ultra-sensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity , 2013, Nature.

[68]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Stimulus-Driven Population Activity Patterns in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[69]  M. Carandini,et al.  The Nature of Shared Cortical Variability , 2015, Neuron.

[70]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Attention stabilizes the shared gain of V4 , 2015 .

[71]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Bridging large-scale neuronal recordings and large-scale network models using dimensionality reduction , 2018, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[72]  Matthew T. Kaufman,et al.  Movement-related activity dominates cortex during sensory-guided decision making , 2018, bioRxiv.