Eye Corners Detection using HAAR Cascade Classifiers in Controlled Environment

Facial landmarks detection is undoubtedly important in many applications in computer vision for example face detection and recognition. This article demonstrated the use of Haar Cascade Classifiers to automatically locate the eye corners. We acquired our 3D face image data by Vectra 3D camera in a controlled environment. We use two data set of 300 eye images to train en and ex cascade classifiers regardless of the left and the right eye. These classifiers were then used to detect and locate the inner (en) and outer (ex) eye landmarks. To train HAAR cascade classifier we usually use huge amounts of data. But in this study, about 300 positive images used to train each classifier. Due to this we observed quite an amount of false positive detection. We developed a simple algorithm to predict the eye corners by first eliminate the false detection and geometrically modeled the eye. Our classifiers able to detect and locate en on 53 out of 60 test images and the ability to detect ex in 59 out of 60 test images. In craniofacial anthropometry, it is very important to locate the facial landmarks as per the standard definition of the landmarks. Our results demonstrated accurate detection of ex and en facial landmarks as per standard definition. In conclusion, our trained enHaar and exHaar cascade classifiers are able to automatically detect the en and ex craniofacial landmarks in a controlled environment.

[1]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[2]  S. Asi,et al.  Validity and reliability evaluation of data acquisition using Vectra 3D compare to direct method , 2012, 2012 IEEE-EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences.

[3]  Tinashe Mutsvangwa,et al.  Morphometric analysis of facial landmark data to characterize the facial phenotype associated with fetal alcohol syndrome , 2007, Journal of anatomy.

[4]  Haiying Xia,et al.  Feature-based eye corner detection from static images , 2009, International Symposium on Multispectral Image Processing and Pattern Recognition.

[5]  C. Cacou Anthropometry of the head and face , 1995 .

[6]  Sybill Naidoo,et al.  Anthropometric Precision and Accuracy of Digital Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry: Comparing the Genex and 3dMD Imaging Systems with One Another and with Direct Anthropometry , 2006, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[7]  S Richmond,et al.  Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on 3D laser-scanned facial images. , 2009, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[8]  Tania S Douglas,et al.  Image processing for craniofacial landmark identification and measurement: a review of photogrammetry and cephalometry. , 2004, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[9]  Richard E. Ward,et al.  Use of Computerized Anthropometry and Morphometrics to Identify Fetal Alcohol Syndrome , 2012 .

[10]  L. Farkas,et al.  Accuracy of Anthropometric Measurements: Past, Present, and Future , 1996, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[11]  Rainer Lienhart,et al.  An extended set of Haar-like features for rapid object detection , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[12]  Gary F. Rogers,et al.  Validity and Reliability of Craniofacial Anthropometric Measurement of 3D Digital Photogrammetric Images , 2008, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.