Soil biota suppress positive plant diversity effects on productivity at high but not low soil fertility

Plant community productivity commonly increases with increasing plant diversity, which is explained by complementarity among plant species in resource utilization (complementarity effect), or by selection of particularly productive plant species in diverse plant communities (selection effect). Recent studies have also shown that soil biota can drive the positive plant diversity–productivity relationship by suppressing productivity more in low‐ than in high‐diversity plant communities. However, much remains unknown about whether soil fertility plays a role in determining how soil biota affect plant diversity–productivity relationships. We hypothesized that under high soil fertility conditions, negative soil biota effects dominate, which reduces plant monoculture biomass more than that of high‐diversity plant communities. Conversely, under low soil fertility conditions, we hypothesized positive soil biota effects dominate, which facilitates plant resource partitioning and enhances community‐level biomass in high‐diversity plant communities. Hence, we expected positive plant diversity–community productivity relationships under low and high soil fertility conditions but caused by different mechanisms. We tested these hypotheses using woody seedlings and set up plant assemblages with four species richness levels (one, two, four and eight species), and grew them in sterilized and unsterilized (sterilized soil + living soil inoculum) soils at two nutrient levels (low versus high fertility). We found that at high fertility negative soil biota effects dominated and suppressed plant community biomass more in high‐diversity plant communities than in monocultures, resulting in reduced complementarity effects of diverse plant communities and a non‐significant plant species richness–community biomass relationship in unsterilized soil. Whereas at low fertility soil biota had net neutral to positive effects on plant community biomass but the beneficial effects did not increase with increasing plant species richness. Instead, soil biota neutrally affected the positive plant species richness–community biomass relationship, presumably due to non‐specific effects of beneficial soil biota. Synthesis. Soil biota and soil fertility interactively determine plant species richness–community biomass relationships. Moreover, soil biota modulate the complementary resource use among plant species. These findings suggest that environmental context plays an important role in determining whether and how soil biota generate the biodiversity–productivity relationship. Future studies would benefit from revealing the mechanisms underlying the interactive effects of soil biota, soil fertility, and plant diversity on ecosystem functioning.

[1]  A. Weigelt,et al.  Plant–soil feedbacks: role of plant functional group and plant traits , 2016 .

[2]  H. Jactel,et al.  Fungal disease incidence along tree diversity gradients depends on latitude in European forests , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[3]  B. Zhu,et al.  Complementarity in nutrient foraging strategies of absorptive fine roots and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi across 14 coexisting subtropical tree species. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[4]  C. Mitchell,et al.  Viral pathogen production in a wild grass host driven by host growth and soil nitrogen. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[5]  Shixiao Yu,et al.  Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi counteract the Janzen-Connell effect of soil pathogens. , 2015, Ecology.

[6]  D. Flynn,et al.  Selection for niche differentiation in plant communities increases biodiversity effects , 2014, Nature.

[7]  F. Pugnaire,et al.  A role for below‐ground biota in plant–plant facilitation , 2013 .

[8]  A. Hodge,et al.  Microbial mediation of plant competition and community structure , 2013 .

[9]  P. Kardol,et al.  Biotic plant–soil feedbacks across temporal scales , 2013 .

[10]  H. Kroon,et al.  Independent variations of plant and soil mixtures reveal soil feedback effects on plant community overyielding , 2013 .

[11]  P. Reich,et al.  Increasing plant diversity effects on productivity with time due to delayed soil biota effects on plants , 2012 .

[12]  K. Beard,et al.  Plant–soil feedbacks provide an additional explanation for diversity–productivity relationships , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Forest Isbell,et al.  Biodiversity impacts ecosystem productivity as much as resources, disturbance, or herbivory , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  P. Reich,et al.  Impacts of Biodiversity Loss Escalate Through Time as Redundancy Fades , 2012, Science.

[15]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Evolutionary tools for phytosanitary risk analysis: phylogenetic signal as a predictor of host range of plant pests and pathogens , 2012, Evolutionary applications.

[16]  M. V. D. van der Heijden,et al.  Mycorrhizal fungal identity and diversity relaxes plant-plant competition. , 2011, Ecology.

[17]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Soil microbes drive the classic plant diversity-productivity pattern. , 2011, Ecology.

[18]  J. Bever,et al.  Rooting theories of plant community ecology in microbial interactions. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  Jason D. Hoeksema,et al.  A meta-analysis of context-dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[20]  Nancy C. Johnson Resource stoichiometry elucidates the structure and function of arbuscular mycorrhizas across scales. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[21]  J. Klironomos,et al.  Plant and fungal identity determines pathogen protection of plant roots by arbuscular mycorrhizas , 2009 .

[22]  D. Rowland,et al.  Plant winners and losers during grassland N-eutrophication differ in biomass allocation and mycorrhizas. , 2008, Ecology.

[23]  Bernhard Schmid,et al.  Janzen-Connell effects are widespread and strong enough to maintain diversity in grasslands. , 2008, Ecology.

[24]  M. V. D. van der Heijden,et al.  The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[25]  I. Bingham,et al.  Influence of nutrition on disease development caused by fungal pathogens: implications for plant disease control , 2007 .

[26]  Ian T. Carroll,et al.  Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time because of species complementarity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  C. Augspurger,et al.  Host Specificity of Pathogenic Pythium Species: Implications for Tree Species Diversity , 2007 .

[28]  B. Casper,et al.  Evaluating plant-soil feedback together with competition in a serpentine grassland. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[29]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Direct and interactive effects of enemies and mutualists on plant performance: a meta-analysis. , 2007, Ecology.

[30]  Michel Loreau,et al.  From selection to complementarity: shifts in the causes of biodiversity–productivity relationships in a long-term biodiversity experiment , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  M. V. D. van der Heijden,et al.  The mycorrhizal contribution to plant productivity, plant nutrition and soil structure in experimental grassland. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[32]  J. Bever,et al.  Three‐Way Interactions among Mutualistic Mycorrhizal Fungi, Plants, and Plant Enemies: Hypotheses and Synthesis , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[33]  F. Berendse,et al.  Diversity-productivity relationships: initial effects, long-term patterns, and underlying mechanisms. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  K. Treseder A meta-analysis of mycorrhizal responses to nitrogen, phosphorus, and atmospheric CO2 in field studies. , 2004, The New phytologist.

[35]  W. H. van der Putten,et al.  Plant community development is affected by nutrients and soil biota , 2004 .

[36]  W. Stanley Harpole,et al.  Mechanisms responsible for the positive diversity–productivity relationship in Minnesota grasslands , 2004 .

[37]  James D. Bever,et al.  GRASSROOTS ECOLOGY: PLANT-MICROBE-SOIL INTERACTIONS AS DRIVERS OF PLANT COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS , 2003 .

[38]  D. Rowland,et al.  Nitrogen enrichment alters mycorrhizal allocation at five mesic to semiarid grasslands , 2003 .

[39]  P. Solomon,et al.  The nutrient supply of pathogenic fungi; a fertile field for study. , 2003, Molecular plant pathology.

[40]  T. M. Bezemer,et al.  Soil invertebrate fauna enhances grassland succession and diversity , 2003, Nature.

[41]  David A. Wardle,et al.  Communities and Ecosystems: Linking the Aboveground and Belowground Components , 2002 .

[42]  V. Borowicz DO ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI ALTER PLANT–PATHOGEN RELATIONS? , 2001 .

[43]  P. Reich,et al.  Diversity and Productivity in a Long-Term Grassland Experiment , 2001, Science.

[44]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments , 2001, Nature.

[45]  R. Wagenaar,et al.  Interpretation of bioassays in the study of interactions between soil organisms and plants: involvement of nutrient factors , 2001 .

[46]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  BIODIVERSITY AND THE DILUTION EFFECT IN DISEASE ECOLOGY , 2001 .

[47]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  Biodiversity series: The function of biodiversity in the ecology of vector-borne zoonotic diseases , 2000 .

[48]  Jenny L. McCune,et al.  The influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on the relationship between plant diversity and productivity , 2000 .

[49]  Ian R. Sanders,et al.  Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity , 1998, Nature.

[50]  W. H. Putten,et al.  How soil-borne pathogens may affect plant competition , 1997 .

[51]  Michael A. Huston,et al.  Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity , 1997, Oecologia.

[52]  Alastair H. Fitter,et al.  Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Protect an Annual Grass from Root Pathogenic Fungi in the Field , 1995 .

[53]  I. Jakobsen,et al.  External hyphae of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with trifolium subterraneum l. 1. spread of hyphae and phosphorus inflow into roots , 1992 .

[54]  Michael Begon,et al.  Disease and Community Structure: The Importance of Host Self-Regulation in a Host-Host-Pathogen Model , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[55]  M. Begon,et al.  A host-host-pathogen model with free-living infective stages, applicable to microbial pest control. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[56]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[57]  Emily Grman,et al.  Resource availability and imbalance affect plant-mycorrhizal interactions: a field test of three hypotheses. , 2013, Ecology.

[58]  J. Maron,et al.  Soil fungal pathogens and the relationship between plant diversity and productivity. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[59]  G. Gilbert Evolutionary ecology of plant diseases in natural ecosystems. , 2002, Annual review of phytopathology.

[60]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning : synthesis and perspectives , 2002 .