Integrated modelling of steady-state scenarios and heating and current drive mixes for ITER

Recent progress on ITER steady-state (SS) scenario modelling by the ITPA-IOS group is reviewed. Code-to-code benchmarks as the IOS group's common activities for the two SS scenarios (weak shear scenario and internal transport barrier scenario) are discussed in terms of transport, kinetic profiles, and heating and current drive (CD) sources using various transport codes. Weak magnetic shear scenarios integrate the plasma core and edge by combining a theory-based transport model (GLF23) with scaled experimental boundary profiles. The edge profiles (at normalized radius ρ = 0.8–1.0) are adopted from an edge-localized mode-averaged analysis of a DIII-D ITER demonstration discharge. A fully noninductive SS scenario is achieved with fusion gain Q = 4.3, noninductive fraction fNI = 100%, bootstrap current fraction fBS = 63% and normalized beta βN = 2.7 at plasma current Ip = 8 MA and toroidal field BT = 5.3 T using ITER day-1 heating and CD capability. Substantial uncertainties come from outside the radius of setting the boundary conditions (ρ = 0.8). The present simulation assumed that βN (ρ) at the top of the pedestal (ρ = 0.91) is about 25% above the peeling–ballooning threshold. ITER will have a challenge to achieve the boundary, considering different operating conditions (Te/Ti ≈ 1 and density peaking). Overall, the experimentally scaled edge is an optimistic side of the prediction. A number of SS scenarios with different heating and CD mixes in a wide range of conditions were explored by exploiting the weak-shear steady-state solution procedure with the GLF23 transport model and the scaled experimental edge. The results are also presented in the operation space for DT neutron power versus stationary burn pulse duration with assumed poloidal flux availability at the beginning of stationary burn, indicating that the long pulse operation goal (3000 s) at Ip = 9 MA is possible. Source calculations in these simulations have been revised for electron cyclotron current drive including parallel momentum conservation effects and for neutral beam current drive with finite orbit and magnetic pitch effects.

[1]  R. E. Waltz,et al.  ITER predictions using the GYRO verified and experimentally validated trapped gyro-Landau fluid transport model , 2011 .

[2]  David Ward,et al.  On the heating mix of ITER , 2010 .

[3]  E. Joffrin,et al.  The CRONOS suite of codes for integrated tokamak modelling , 2010 .

[4]  Nikolai B. Marushchenko,et al.  Corrections to the paper ‘electron cyclotron current drive calculated for ITER conditions using different models’ (2008 Nucl. Fusion 48 054002) , 2009 .

[5]  J. Contributors,et al.  Pedestal width and ELM size identity studies in JET and DIII-D; implications for ITER , 2009 .

[6]  T. C. Luce,et al.  Realizing Steady State Tokamak Operation for Fusion Energy , 2009 .

[7]  C. Kessel,et al.  Simulations of KSTAR high performance steady state operation scenarios , 2009 .

[8]  R. Budny,et al.  Validation of on- and off-axis neutral beam current drive against experiment in DIII-D , 2008 .

[9]  R. J. Groebner,et al.  Development and validation of a predictive model for the pedestal height , 2008 .

[10]  T. Luce,et al.  Prospects for Off-Axis Neutral Beam Current Drive in the DIII-D Tokamak , 2008 .

[11]  T. Petrie,et al.  Demonstration of ITER operational scenarios on DIII-D , 2008 .

[12]  F. Imbeaux,et al.  Critical threshold behavior for steady-state internal transport barriers in burning plasmas. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[13]  Nikolai B. Marushchenko,et al.  Electron cyclotron current drive calculated for ITER conditions using different models , 2008 .

[14]  R. W. Harvey,et al.  Benchmarking of codes for electron cyclotron heating and electron cyclotron current drive under ITER conditions , 2008 .

[15]  C. Kessel,et al.  Simulation of the hybrid and steady state advanced operating modes in ITER , 2007 .

[16]  M. A. Henderson,et al.  ITER ECRH-ECCD System Capabilities for Extended Physics Applications , 2007 .

[17]  K. Ikeda.  Progress in the ITER Physics Basis , 2007 .

[18]  E. Joffrin,et al.  Chapter 6: Steady state operation , 2007 .

[19]  Tomonori Takizuka,et al.  Profile formation and sustainment of autonomous tokamak plasma with current hole configuration , 2005 .

[20]  Eduardo F. D'Azevedo,et al.  All-orders spectral calculation of radio-frequency heating in two-dimensional toroidal plasmas , 2001 .

[21]  Y Kamada,et al.  Non-dimensional transport study on ELMy H-mode plasmas in JT-60U , 2000 .

[22]  T. Mau,et al.  Modeling of fast wave absorption by beam ions in DIII-D discharges , 1999 .

[23]  A. Pletzer,et al.  Stabilization of neoclassical tearing modes using a continuous localized current drive , 1999 .

[24]  T. C. Luce,et al.  Electron cyclotron current drive efficiency in general tokamak geometry , 2003 .

[25]  R. Waltz,et al.  A gyro-Landau-fluid transport model , 1997 .

[26]  C. Kessel,et al.  Negative magnetic shear modes of operation in the Alcator C-Mod tokamak near the beta limit , 1997 .

[27]  R. S. Devoto,et al.  Numerical analysis of 2D MHD equilibrium with non-inductive plasma current in tokamaks , 1992 .

[28]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Equilibrium analysis of current profiles in tokamaks , 1990 .

[29]  Harvey,et al.  Power dependence of electron-cyclotron current drive for low- and high-field absorption in tokamaks. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[30]  F. Hinton,et al.  Effect of finite aspect ratio on the neoclassical ion thermal conductivity in the banana regime , 1982 .

[31]  D. McCune,et al.  New techniques for calculating heat and particle source rates due to neutral beam injection in axisymmetric tokamaks , 1981 .

[32]  R. J. Hawryluk,et al.  An Empirical Approach to Tokamak Transport , 1981 .