Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Oxyfuel and Post-combustion Capture with MEA and AMP/PZ - Case Studies from the EDDiCCUT Project

Abstract This work presents the results of a comparative life cycle assessment study for three CCS technologies applied to a coal-fired power plant: post-combustion capture with MEA, post combustion capture with AMP/PZ and cryogenic oxy-fuel. This study has been performed in the context of the EDDiCCUT project, which aims to develop an environmental due diligence framework for assessing novel CCUS technologies. The research shows that there are no significant differences in climate change potential (CCP) for the technologies under study. In the three cases the reduction is about 70% (70% for the plant with MEA, 71% for the plant with AMP-PZ, and 73% for the plant with oxy-fuel technology). With regard to other impacts (e.g., acidification, toxicity, resource depletion) the results show an increase in the impacts as consequence of CCS, mostly driven by the increase amount of feedstock per kWh. Contrary to CCS, there are clear differences among the technologies with results ranging between 20 and 30%. Toxicity impacts related to the operation of the solvent-based carbon capture unit were also considered; however, it was observed that their contribution was only around 2% of the total impact for human toxicity potential. Rather, the largest contributor to human toxicity impacts in the life cycle of coal power plants with and without CCS is coal mining waste disposal.

[1]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[2]  Andrew Garnett,et al.  What lies in store for CCS , 2014 .

[3]  Tomas Mikoviny,et al.  Emission Results of Amine Plant Operations from MEA Testing at the CO2 Technology Centre Mongstad , 2014 .

[4]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Life cycle assessment of natural gas combined cycle power plant with post-combustion carbon capture, transport and storage , 2011 .

[5]  Maria C. Iliuta,et al.  Stability of aqueous amine solutions to thermal and oxidative degradation in the absence and the presence of CO2 , 2014 .

[6]  S. Brandani,et al.  Process Configuration Studies of the Amine Capture Process for Coal-fired Power Plants , 2013 .

[7]  Neil Hewitt,et al.  Comparative assessment of sub-critical versus advanced super-critical oxyfuel fired PF boilers with CO2 sequestration facilities , 2007 .

[8]  Stefano Brandani,et al.  CO2 capture from syngas by an adsorption process at a biomass gasification CHP plant: Its comparison with amine-based CO2 capture , 2015 .

[9]  Mijndert van der Spek,et al.  Techno-economic performance of state of the art, highly integrated oxyfuel technology for low-CO2 coal-fired electricity production (word count: 999) , 2016 .

[10]  Ning Dai,et al.  Measurement of nitrosamine and nitramine formation from NOx reactions with amines during amine-based carbon dioxide capture for postcombustion carbon sequestration. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Economic assessment of novel amine based CO2 capture technologies integrated in power plants based on European Benchmarking Task Force methodology , 2015 .

[12]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Comparative life cycle environmental assessment of CCS technologies , 2011 .

[13]  Andrea Ramírez,et al.  Comparative assessment of CO2 capture technologies for carbon-intensive industrial processes , 2012 .

[14]  Davide Bocciardo,et al.  Modelling and Multi-stage Design of Membrane Processes Applied to Carbon Capture in Coal-fired Power Plants , 2013 .

[15]  André Faaij,et al.  Model development and process simulation of postcombustion carbon capture technology with aqueous AMP/PZ solvent , 2016 .

[16]  Olav Bolland,et al.  Evaluating Pressure Swing Adsorption as a CO2 separation technique in coal-fired power plants , 2015 .

[17]  Edgar G Hertwich,et al.  Human and environmental impact assessment of postcombustion CO2 capture focusing on emissions from amine-based scrubbing solvents to air. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Tielin Wang,et al.  Oxidative degradation of aqueous PZ solution and AMP/PZ blends for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture , 2014 .

[19]  Haiqing Lin,et al.  Power plant post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: An opportunity for membranes , 2010 .

[20]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Environmental Due Diligence of CO2 Capture and Utilization Technologies – Framework and application , 2014 .

[21]  Joris Koornneef,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a pulverized coal power plant with post-combustion capture, transport and storage of CO2 , 2008 .

[22]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Thermodynamic assessment of amine based CO2 capture technologies in power plants based on European Benchmarking Task Force methodology , 2014 .

[23]  Arthur C. Petersen,et al.  A method for the analysis of assumptions in model-based environmental assessments , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[24]  Andrea Ramírez,et al.  Techno-economic Performance of State-of-the-Art Oxyfuel Technology for Low-CO2 Coal-fired Electricity Production , 2017 .