The Role of the Air Traffic Controller in Future Air Traffic Management: An Empirical Study of Active Control versus Passive Monitoring

Proposals for air traffic management such as Free Flight call for a transfer of responsibility for separation between aircraft from air traffic controllers (ATCos) to pilots. Under many proposals, the role of the ATCo will change from one of active control to passive monitoring. The present study directly compared these types of control with respect to ATCo mental workload, conflict detection, and memory. Eighteen ATCos participated in an air traffic control simulation of Free Flight procedures under moderate and high traffic load. Dependent variables included accuracy and timeliness in detecting potential conflicts, accepting and handing off aircraft, mental workload (as assessed by a secondary task, heart rate variability, and subjective ratings), and memory for aircraft location. High traffic density and passive control both degraded conflict detection performance. Actual or potential applications of this research include the recommendation that designs for future air traffic management keep authority for separation of aircraft with the controller.

[1]  N. Mackworth.  The Breakdown of Vigilance during Prolonged Visual Search 1 , 1948 .

[2]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Distribution of Attention, Situation Awareness and Workload in a Passive Air Traffic Control Task: Implications for Operational Errors and Automation , 1998 .

[3]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Performance Consequences of Automation-Induced 'Complacency' , 1993 .

[4]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Mustapha Mouloua,et al.  Automation and Human Performance : Theory and Applications , 1996 .

[6]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  Air Traffic Control Workstation Mock-Up for Free Flight Experimentation: Lab Development and Capabilities , 1997 .

[8]  W H Teichner,et al.  The Detection of a Simple Visual Signal as a Function of Time of Watch , 1974, Human factors.

[9]  Ben Willems,et al.  Implications of reduced involvement in en route air traffic control. , 1999 .

[10]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  DESIGNING FOR SITUATION AWARENESS AND TRUST IN AUTOMATION , 1995 .

[11]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[12]  J Aasman,et al.  Operator Effort and the Measurement of Heart-Rate Variability , 1987, Human factors.

[13]  R I Thackray,et al.  Detection efficiency on an air traffic control monitoring task with and without computer aiding. , 1989, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[14]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Future of Air Traffic Control: Human Operators and Automation , 1998 .

[15]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Role of memory in air traffic control. , 1998 .

[16]  Scott M. Galster,et al.  Air Traffic Controller Performance and Workload Under Mature Free Flight: Conflict Detection and Resolution of Aircraft Self-Separation , 2001 .

[17]  R. Parasuraman.  Memory load and event rate control sensitivity decrements in sustained attention. , 1979, Science.

[18]  Kenneth R. Allendoerfer,et al.  Effect of Free Flight Conditions on Controller Performance, Workload, and Situation Awareness , 1997 .

[19]  D. Whitfield,et al.  The Air-Traffic Controller , 1978 .

[20]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  AUTOMATION TOOLS FOR CONTROLLERS IN FUTURE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL. , 1998 .

[21]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  Visual Search in Complex Displays: Factors Affecting Conflict Detection by Air Traffic Controllers , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[22]  William N. Dember,et al.  VIGILANCE AND WORKLOAD IN AUTOMATED SYSTEMS. , 1996 .