Visual performance with real-life tasks under adaptive-optics ocular aberration correction.

We measured the effect of the correction of the natural aberrations of the eye by means of adaptive optics on the subject's performance on three different visual tasks: subjective sharpness assessment of natural images, familiar face recognition, and facial expression recognition. Images were presented through a dedicated psychophysical channel and viewed through an electromagnetic deformable mirror. Experiments were performed on 17 normal subjects. Ocular aberrations (astigmatism and higher order aberrations) were reduced on average from 0.366 +/- 0.154 to 0.101 +/- 0.055 mum for a 5-mm pupil diameter. On average, subjects considered to be sharper 84 +/- 14% of the images viewed under AO correction, and there was a significant correlation between the amount of corrected aberrations and the percentage of images that the subject considered sharper when observed under AO-corrected aberrations. In all eyes (except one), AO correction improved familiar face recognition, by a factor of x1.13 +/- 0.12 on average. However, AO correction did not improve systematically facial expression recognition.

[1]  D G Pitts,et al.  Visual acuity as a function of age. , 1982, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[2]  Francesc S. Beltran,et al.  Face perception: An integrative review of the role of spatial frequencies , 2006, Psychological research.

[3]  Sergio Barbero,et al.  Optical quality and depth-of-field of eyes implanted with spherical and aspheric intraocular lenses. , 2005, Journal of refractive surgery.

[4]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Theoretical comparison of aberration-correcting customized and aspheric intraocular lenses. , 2007, Journal of refractive surgery.

[5]  David Williams,et al.  Visual performance after correcting the monochromatic and chromatic aberrations of the eye. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[6]  Larry N Thibos,et al.  Metrics of Retinal Image Quality Predict Visual Performance in Eyes With 20/17 or Better Visual Acuity , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[7]  Susana Marcos,et al.  Accommodative lag and fluctuations when optical aberrations are manipulated. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[8]  E Peli,et al.  Image enhancement for the visually impaired: the effects of enhancement on face recognition. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[9]  Enrique Hita,et al.  Correlation between image quality and visual performance , 2008 .

[10]  J A Hanley.  Alternative approaches to receiver operating characteristic analyses. , 1988, Radiology.

[11]  Susana Marcos,et al.  DEVELOPMENT, CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE OF AN ELECTROMAGNETIC MIRROR BASED ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEM FOR VISUAL OPTICS – Oral Paper , 2008 .

[12]  Reading faces in infancy: Developing a multi-level analysis of a social stimulus , 2008 .

[13]  C. Nelson.  The Development and Neural Bases of Face Recognition , 2001 .

[14]  H. Halit,et al.  Is high-spatial frequency information used in the early stages of face detection? , 2006, Brain Research.

[15]  D R Williams,et al.  Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  A. Young,et al.  Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on identity and expression , 1986, Psychological research.

[17]  R. Näsänen.  Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images , 1999, Vision Research.

[18]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[19]  Susana Marcos,et al.  Optical aberrations in the mouse eye , 2006, Vision Research.

[20]  Susana Marcos,et al.  Influence of adaptive-optics ocular aberration correction on visual acuity at different luminances and contrast polarities. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[21]  D. Lara-Saucedo,et al.  Aberrations of the Human Eye in Visible and Near Infrared Illumination , 2003, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[22]  Jill L. King,et al.  Forced choice and ordinal discrete rating assessment of image quality: A comparison , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[23]  P. Bennett,et al.  Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers , 1999, Vision Research.

[24]  C. Metz,et al.  A New Approach for Testing the Significance of Differences Between ROC Curves Measured from Correlated Data , 1984 .

[25]  John L. Barbur,et al.  Effects of higher-order aberrations on contrast acuity as a function of light level , 2008 .

[26]  C. Owsley,et al.  Contrast sensitivity, acuity, and the perception of 'real-world' targets. , 1987, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[28]  Hervé Abdi,et al.  Processing Faces and Facial Expressions , 2003, Neuropsychology Review.

[29]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Use of adaptive optics to determine the optimal ocular spherical aberration , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[30]  Sergio Barbero,et al.  Myopic versus hyperopic eyes: axial length, corneal shape and optical aberrations. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[31]  Edwin J Sarver,et al.  Visual Acuity as a Function of Zernike Mode and Level of Root Mean Square Error , 2003, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[32]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[33]  E. Peli,et al.  Image enhancement for the visually impaired. Simulations and experimental results. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[34]  C. Metz.  Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[35]  David R Williams,et al.  Neural compensation for the eye's optical aberrations. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[36]  Eli Peli,et al.  Image Enhancement For The Visually Impaired , 1984 .

[37]  I L Bailey,et al.  Face recognition in age-related maculopathy. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[38]  R. Dolan,et al.  Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  Larry N Thibos,et al.  Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[40]  Theo Seiler,et al.  Clinical results of wavefront‐guided laser in situ keratomileusis 3 months after surgery , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[41]  J. Schulkin,et al.  Facial expressions of emotion: A cognitive neuroscience perspective , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[42]  S. Marcos,et al.  Aberrations and visual performance following standard laser vision correction. , 2001, Journal of refractive surgery.

[43]  Michael A. Webster,et al.  Neural adjustments to image blur , 2010 .

[44]  I. Craw,et al.  Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  Charles E Metz,et al.  ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature , 2008, Radiological physics and technology.

[46]  David Zadok,et al.  Ocular higher-order aberrations in eyes with supernormal vision. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[47]  Charles E Metz,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[48]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.