Are the common assimilate pool and trophic relationships appropriate for dealing with the observed plasticity of grapevine development?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Models based on the consideration of plant development as the result of source-sink relationships between organs suffer from an inherent lack of quantification of the effect of trophic competition on organ growth processes. The 'common assimilate pool theory' underlying many such models is highly debatable. METHODS Six experiments were carried out in a greenhouse and outdoors with two grapevine cultivars and with 12 management systems, resulting in different types of plant architecture. Ten variables were used to quantify the impact of variations in assimilate supply and topological distances between sources and sinks on organogenesis, morphogenesis and biomass growth. KEY RESULTS A hierarchy of the responses of these processes to variations in assimilate supply was identified. Organ size seemed to be independent of assimilate supply, whereas both organogenesis and biomass growth were affected by variations in assimilate supply. Lower levels of organ biomass growth in response to the depletion of assimilate supplies seemed to be the principal mechanism underlying the plasticity of plant development in different environments. Defoliation or axis ablation resulted in changes in the relationship between growth processes and assimilate supply, highlighting the influence of non-trophic determinants. The findings cast doubt on the relevance of 'the common assimilate pool theory' for modelling the development of grapevine. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest new formalisms for increasing the ability of models to take plant plasticity into account. The combination of an ecophysiological model for morphogenesis taking environmental signals into account and a biomass driven model for organogenesis and biomass allocation taking the topological distances between the sources and the sinks into account appears to be a promising approach. Moreover, in order to simulate the impact of agronomic practices, it will be necessary to take into account the non-trophic determinants of plant development such as hormonal signaletics.

[1]  F. Tardieu,et al.  A whole-plant analysis of the dynamics of expansion of individual leaves of two sunflower hybrids. , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[2]  P. Prusinkiewicz,et al.  Using L-systems for modeling source-sink interactions, architecture and physiology of growing trees: the L-PEACH model. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[3]  Alexandre Bosc,et al.  EMILION, a tree functional-structural model: Presentation and first application to the analysis of branch carbon balance , 2000 .

[4]  Y. Guédon,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the phenotypic variability of shoot architecture in two grapevine (Vitis vinifera) cultivars. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[5]  Annikki Mäkelä,et al.  Implications of the pipe model theory on dry matter partitioning and height growth in trees , 1985 .

[6]  R. G. Hurd,et al.  An Analysis of the Growth of Young Tomato Plants in Water Culture at Different Light Integrals and CO2 Concentrations I. Physiological Aspects , 1974 .

[7]  L C Ho,et al.  Metabolism and Compartmentation of Imported Sugars in Sink Organs in Relation to Sink Strength , 1988 .

[8]  Alain Charcosset,et al.  Combining Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis and an Ecophysiological Model to Analyze the Genetic Variability of the Responses of Maize Leaf Growth to Temperature and Water Deficit1 , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[9]  C. Granier,et al.  Rewatering plants after a long water-deficit treatment reveals that leaf epidermal cells retain their ability to expand after the leaf has apparently reached its final size. , 2008, Annals of botany.

[10]  F. Houllier,et al.  A transport model for tree ring width. , 1997 .

[11]  Paul-Henry Cournède,et al.  A model-based analysis of the dynamics of carbon balance at the whole-plant level in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2008, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[12]  M. Vandame,et al.  Testing the branch autonomy theory: a 13C/14C double-labelling experiment on differentially shaded branches , 2004 .

[13]  S. Sultan.  Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[14]  Jérémie Lecoeur,et al.  Leaf Primordium Initiation and Expanded Leaf Production are Co-ordinated through Similar Response to Air Temperature in Pea (Pisum sativum L.) , 1997 .

[15]  D. Barthélémy,et al.  A dynamic model of plant growth with interactions between development and functional mechanisms to study plant structural plasticity related to trophic competition. , 2009, Annals of botany.

[16]  Evelyne Costes,et al.  Changes in primary and secondary growth as influenced by crop load in ‘Fantasmet’® apricot trees , 2000 .

[17]  R. G. Hurd,et al.  An Analysis of the Growth of Young Tomato Plants in Water Culture at Different Light Integrals and CO2 ConcentrationsII. A Mathematical Model , 1974 .

[18]  P. B. Lombard,et al.  Environmental and Management Practices Affecting Grape Composition and Wine Quality - A Review , 1993, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[19]  Ep Heuvelink,et al.  Influence of Sink-Source Interaction on Dry Matter Production in Tomato , 1995 .

[20]  Evelyne Costes,et al.  Quantitative analysis of shoot development and branching patterns in Actinidia. , 2002, Annals of botany.

[21]  K. Chenu,et al.  Simulations of virtual plants reveal a role for SERRATE in the response of leaf development to light in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[22]  S. Abo-Hamed,et al.  BIOCHEMICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF LEAF DEVELOPMENT IN COCOA (THEOBROMA CACAO) , 1984 .

[23]  B. G. Coombe,et al.  Growth Stages of the Grapevine: Adoption of a system for identifying grapevine growth stages , 1995 .

[24]  N. Bertin,et al.  Contribution of carbohydrate pools to the variations in leaf mass per area within a tomato plant , 1999 .

[25]  Loïc Pagès,et al.  GRAAL-CN: A model of GRowth, Architecture and ALlocation for Carbon and Nitrogen dynamics within whole plants formalised at the organ level , 2007 .

[26]  Bruno Moulia,et al.  Quantitative contributions of blue light and PAR to the photocontrol of plant morphogenesis in Trifolium repens (L.). , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[27]  H. Bleiholder,et al.  Growth Stages of the Grapevine: Phenological growth stages of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. ssp. vinifera)—Codes and descriptions according to the extended BBCH scale† , 1995 .

[28]  B. Andrieu,et al.  Dynamics of the Elongation of Internodes in Maize ( Zea mays L.): Analysis of Phases of Elongation and their Relationships to Phytomer Development , 2000 .

[29]  D. Luquet,et al.  EcoMeristem, a model of morphogenesis and competition among sinks in rice. 1. Concept, validation and sensitivity analysis. , 2006, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[30]  Ep Heuvelink,et al.  Dry matter partitioning in a tomato plant: one common assimilate pool? , 1995 .

[31]  Xiaopeng Zhang,et al.  Plant growth modelling and applications: the increasing importance of plant architecture in growth models. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[32]  E. Münch,et al.  Die stoffbewegungen in der Pflanze , 1931, Nature.

[33]  Greg McLean,et al.  Short-term responses of leaf growth rate to water deficit scale up to whole-plant and crop levels: an integrated modelling approach in maize. , 2008, Plant, cell & environment.

[34]  S. Abo-Hamed,et al.  BIOCHEMICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF LEAF DEVELOPMENT IN COCOA (THEOBROMA CACAO). VI. HORMONAL INTERACTION BETWEEN MATURE LEAVES AND THE SHOOT APEX , 1981 .

[35]  Eric Lebon,et al.  Branch development controls leaf area dynamics in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) growing in drying soil. , 2006, Annals of botany.

[36]  François Tardieu,et al.  Modelling leaf expansion in a fluctuating environment: are changes in specific leaf area a consequence of changes in expansion rate? , 1999 .

[37]  E. H. Pyle,et al.  EVIDENCE OF ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE IN PLASTICITY: DENSITY‐ AND SITE‐DEPENDENT SELECTION ON SHADE‐AVOIDANCE RESPONSES IN IMPATIENS CAPENSIS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[38]  P. Newton,et al.  Effect of Light Quality (Red:Far-red Ratio) at the Apical Bud of the Main Stolon on Morphogenesis of Trifolium repens L. , 1994 .

[39]  Paul-Henry Cournède,et al.  Using a mathematical model to evaluate the trophic and non-trophic determinants of axis development in grapevine. , 2009, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[40]  M. Maeshima,et al.  Expanding roles of plant aquaporins in plasma membranes and cell organelles. , 2008, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[41]  I. F. Wardlaw,et al.  Tansley Review No. 27 The control of carbon partitioning in plants. , 1990, The New phytologist.

[42]  C. R. Hale,et al.  The effect of developmental stage on direction of translocation of photosynthate in Vitis vinifera , 1962 .

[43]  Jérémie Lecoeur,et al.  Competition, traits and resource depletion in plant communities , 2009, Oecologia.

[44]  Bill Shipley,et al.  Interacting determinants of specific leaf area in 22 herbaceous species: effects of irradiance and nutrient availability , 1999 .

[45]  H. Schultz,et al.  Vegetative Growth Distribution During Water Deficits in Vitis vinifera L , 1988 .

[46]  B. Shipley,et al.  The balanced‐growth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass allocation , 2002 .

[47]  Pigliucci,et al.  Genes affecting phenotypic plasticity in Arabidopsis: pleiotropic effects and reproductive fitness of photomorphogenic mutants , 1999 .

[48]  C. Gary,et al.  Effect of Fruit Load on Partitioning of Dry Matter and Energy in Cantaloupe (Cucumis melo L.) , 1999 .

[49]  J. H. M. Thornley,et al.  Mathematical models in plant physiology : a quantitative approach to problems in plant and crop physiology , 1976 .

[50]  J. Monteith.  Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain , 1977 .

[51]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Multi-scale phenotyping of leaf expansion in response to environmental changes: the whole is more than the sum of parts. , 2009, Plant, cell & environment.

[52]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Expansion of pea leaves subjected to short water deficit: cell number and cell size are sensitive to stress at different periods of leaf development , 1995 .

[53]  M. Rives.  Vigour, pruning, cropping in the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). I. A literature review , 2000 .

[54]  Francois Tardieu,et al.  Shoot development in grapevine (Vitis vinifera) is affected by the modular branching pattern of the stem and intra- and inter-shoot trophic competition. , 2004, Annals of botany.

[55]  B. Montgomery,et al.  Detection of Spatial-Specific Phytochrome Responses Using Targeted Expression of Biliverdin Reductase in Arabidopsis1[OA] , 2008, Plant Physiology.

[56]  Jérémie Lecoeur,et al.  Influence of intra-shoot trophic competition on shoot development in two grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera). , 2008, Physiologia plantarum.

[57]  Thomas M. Hinckley,et al.  THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF BRANCH AUTONOMY , 1991 .

[58]  André Lacointe,et al.  Carbon allocation among tree organs: A review of basic processes and representation in functional-structural tree models , 2000 .

[59]  Paul-Henry Cournède,et al.  Parametric identification of a functional-structural tree growth model and application to beech trees (Fagus sylvatica). , 2008, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[60]  D. L. Bell,et al.  Population differentiation for plasticity to light in an annual herb: Adaptation and cost. , 2008, American journal of botany.

[61]  A. L. McLeod,et al.  Do leaves contribute to the abscisic acid present in the xylem sap of ‘draughted’ sunflower plants? , 1991 .