Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training

BackgroundManual body weight supported treadmill training and robot-aided treadmill training are frequently used techniques for the gait rehabilitation of individuals after stroke and spinal cord injury. Current evidence suggests that robot-aided gait training may be improved by making robotic behavior more patient-cooperative. In this study, we have investigated the immediate effects of patient-cooperative versus non-cooperative robot-aided gait training on individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI).MethodsEleven patients with iSCI participated in a single training session with the gait rehabilitation robot Lokomat. The patients were exposed to four different training modes in random order: During both non-cooperative position control and compliant impedance control, fixed timing of movements was provided. During two variants of the patient-cooperative path control approach, free timing of movements was enabled and the robot provided only spatial guidance. The two variants of the path control approach differed in the amount of additional support, which was either individually adjusted or exaggerated. Joint angles and torques of the robot as well as muscle activity and heart rate of the patients were recorded. Kinematic variability, interaction torques, heart rate and muscle activity were compared between the different conditions.ResultsPatients showed more spatial and temporal kinematic variability, reduced interaction torques, a higher increase of heart rate and more muscle activity in the patient-cooperative path control mode with individually adjusted support than in the non-cooperative position control mode. In the compliant impedance control mode, spatial kinematic variability was increased and interaction torques were reduced, but temporal kinematic variability, heart rate and muscle activity were not significantly higher than in the position control mode.ConclusionsPatient-cooperative robot-aided gait training with free timing of movements made individuals with iSCI participate more actively and with larger kinematic variability than non-cooperative, position-controlled robot-aided gait training.

[1]  Subhabrata Chakraborti,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Inference , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[2]  Martin Buss,et al.  Compliant actuation of rehabilitation robots , 2008, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[3]  S Hesse,et al.  Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS) , 2007, Clinical rehabilitation.

[4]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Robotic movement training as an optimization problem: designing a controller that assists only as needed , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[5]  R Riener,et al.  Patient-driven control of FES-supported standing up: a simulation study. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  M. Lewek,et al.  Allowing Intralimb Kinematic Variability During Locomotor Training Poststroke Improves Kinematic Consistency: A Subgroup Analysis From a Randomized Clinical Trial , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[7]  E. Field-Fote,et al.  Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation Open Access Gait Quality Is Improved by Locomotor Training in Individuals with Sci Regardless of Training Approach , 2022 .

[8]  Vicky Chan,et al.  Do robotic and non-robotic arm movement training drive motor recovery after stroke by a common neural mechanism? experimental evidence and a computational model , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  Raul Benitez,et al.  Motor adaptation as a greedy optimization of error and effort. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  T. Demott,et al.  Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- Versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study , 2008, Stroke.

[11]  V. Dietz,et al.  Swing Phase Resistance Enhances Flexor Muscle Activity During Treadmill Locomotion in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[12]  P. Thier,et al.  Specific influences of cerebellar dysfunctions on gait. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  L. Cohen,et al.  Role of voluntary drive in encoding an elementary motor memory. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[15]  Kelly P Westlake,et al.  Pilot study of Lokomat versus manual-assisted treadmill training for locomotor recovery post-stroke , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[16]  Joseph Hidler,et al.  Kinematic trajectories while walking within the Lokomat robotic gait-orthosis. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  Roger Weber,et al.  Tools for understanding and optimizing robotic gait training. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  R. Riener,et al.  A Novel Method for Automatic Treadmill Speed Adaptation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  V. Dietz,et al.  Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  Alfred D. Grant.  Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function , 2010 .

[21]  P. London.  Injury , 1969, Definitions.

[22]  H. Barbeau,et al.  Optimal outcomes obtained with body-weight support combined with treadmill training in stroke subjects. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  Martin A. Giese,et al.  Morphable Models for the Analysis and Synthesis of Complex Motion Patterns , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[24]  Robert Riener,et al.  Patient-Cooperative Control: Providing Safe Support without Restricting Movement , 2009 .

[25]  Vincent S. Huang,et al.  Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[26]  R. Riener,et al.  Human-centered rehabilitation robotics , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[27]  PL Dittuno,et al.  Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II): scale revision , 2001, Spinal Cord.

[28]  V. Dietz,et al.  Driven gait orthosis for improvement of locomotor training in paraplegic patients , 2001, Spinal Cord.

[29]  Crister Ceberg,et al.  Conversion of greyscale intensity values from CBCT images acquired on Elekta XVI to HU for treatment planning dose calculations , 2009 .

[30]  R. Riener,et al.  Path Control: A Method for Patient-Cooperative Robot-Aided Gait Rehabilitation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[31]  R. Riener,et al.  Iterative Learning Synchronization of Robotic Rehabilitation Tasks , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[32]  C. Braun,et al.  Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  T. Hornby,et al.  Metabolic Costs and Muscle Activity Patterns During Robotic- and Therapist-Assisted Treadmill Walking in Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury , 2006, Physical Therapy.

[34]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Rehabilitation Robotics: Performance-Based Progressive Robot-Assisted Therapy , 2003, Auton. Robots.

[35]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Automatic gait-pattern adaptation algorithms for rehabilitation with a 4-DOF robotic orthosis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation.

[36]  R. Waters,et al.  International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[37]  Rong Song,et al.  A Comparison Between Electromyography-Driven Robot and Passive Motion Device on Wrist Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[38]  I Gelernter,et al.  The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: Reliability and validity in a multi-center international study , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[39]  Carmen Krewer,et al.  The influence of different Lokomat walking conditions on the energy expenditure of hemiparetic patients and healthy subjects. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[40]  J. Perry,et al.  Gait Analysis , 2024 .

[41]  V. Dietz,et al.  Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[42]  C. Winstein,et al.  Effects of Task-Specific Locomotor and Strength Training in Adults Who Were Ambulatory After Stroke: Results of the STEPS Randomized Clinical Trial , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[43]  John F. Ditunno,et al.  Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II): scale revision. , 2001 .

[44]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  Influence of haptic guidance in learning a novel visuomotor task , 2009, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[45]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  A Computational Model of Human-Robot Load Sharing during Robot-Assisted Arm Movement Training after Stroke , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[46]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Optimizing Compliant, Model-Based Robotic Assistance to Promote Neurorehabilitation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[47]  Joseph Hidler,et al.  Activity-based therapies , 2006, NeuroRX.

[48]  T. Hornby,et al.  Robotic-assisted, body-weight-supported treadmill training in individuals following motor incomplete spinal cord injury. , 2005, Physical therapy.

[49]  H. Barbeau,et al.  A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. , 1998, Stroke.

[50]  Graham H. Creasey,et al.  International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. American Spinal Injury Association. , 1997 .

[51]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Slacking by the human motor system: Computational models and implications for robotic orthoses , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[52]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Feasibility of Manual Teach-and-Replay and Continuous Impedance Shaping for Robotic Locomotor Training Following Spinal Cord Injury , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[53]  Rieko Osu,et al.  CNS Learns Stable, Accurate, and Efficient Movements Using a Simple Algorithm , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  J. Burdick,et al.  Implications of Assist-As-Needed Robotic Step Training after a Complete Spinal Cord Injury on Intrinsic Strategies of Motor Learning , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  G. J. Thomas.  The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements , 1967 .

[56]  Kenneth J. Hunt,et al.  Feedback Control of Oxygen Uptake During Robot-Assisted Gait , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[57]  J. Hidler,et al.  Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[58]  N. A. Bernshteĭn.  The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[59]  B. Dobkin,et al.  The Evolution of Walking-Related Outcomes Over the First 12 Weeks of Rehabilitation for Incomplete Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: The Multicenter Randomized Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[60]  S.K. Agrawal,et al.  Active Leg Exoskeleton (ALEX) for Gait Rehabilitation of Motor-Impaired Patients , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[61]  Ross Querry,et al.  Robotic orthoses for body weight-supported treadmill training. , 2006, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[62]  Brady T. West,et al.  Linear Mixed Models: A Practical Guide Using Statistical Software , 2006 .

[63]  Jan F. Veneman,et al.  The Effects on Kinematics and Muscle Activity of Walking in a Robotic Gait Trainer During Zero-Force Control , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[64]  A. Mayr,et al.  Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Crossover Study of Gait Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Using the Lokomat Gait Orthosis , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.