When Online Recycling Enables Givers to Escape the Tensions of the Gift Economy

The present article explores a relatively new way for consumers to dispose of items they no longer use, namely free recycling websites. Online recycling is based on an encounter with an unknown recipient to give something away 'in person'. A phenomenological approach was used to understand the meaning of giving through free recycling websites. Placing the focus on the donor's perspective, we analysed Internet postings and conducted 27 in-depth interviews. Our research shows that (1) when the object is given, the online giver is less concerned about the risk of refusal, since the recipient has deliberately made the choice to take the item; (2) when the item is received, the encounter with the recipient removes the anonymity of charities and (3) in return, the encounter with the recipient offers the giver acknowledgement for the gesture without committing them to a relationship with the recipient in the way a gift to kith or kin might do. While former literature has highlighted certain tensions in the gift economy, this study shows how free recycling websites can help to alleviate such tensions. The research highlights how this system of object disposition enhances social interactions between two strangers that share an interest in the same object. The article shows how this new form of gift-giving relationship is both rewarding and liberating: it is rewarding thanks to the interaction with the recipient (unlike donations to charities) without necessarily creating a bond of dependence (unlike giving to someone you know).

[1]  Tina M. Lowrey,et al.  Gift Selection for Easy and Difficult Recipients: A Social Roles Interpretation , 1993 .

[2]  Douglas C. West,et al.  Perceptual determinants of nonprofit giving behavior , 2006 .

[3]  R. Bagozzi Marketing as Exchange , 1975 .

[4]  Eric J. Arnould,et al.  Older Consumers' Disposition of Special Possessions , 2000 .

[5]  A. Gouldner THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[6]  A. Caillé,et al.  L'esprit du don , 1995 .

[7]  Annette B. Weiner Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While Giving , 1992 .

[8]  Michelle Renee Nelson,et al.  Downshifting Consumer = Upshifting Citizen? An Examination of a Local Freecycle Community , 2007 .

[9]  Gretchen M. Herrmann Gift or commodity: what changes hands in the U.S. garage sale? , 1997 .

[10]  Sidney J. Levy,et al.  The dark side of the gift , 1993 .

[11]  S. Dobscha,et al.  Hybrid Pro-Social Exchange Systems: the Case of Freecycle , 2011 .

[12]  Shuling Liao,et al.  Buying while expecting to sell: The economic psychology of online resale , 2010 .

[13]  R. Belk Possessions and the Extended Self , 1988 .

[14]  H. Cherrier Custodian behavior: A material expression of anti‐consumerism , 2010 .

[15]  Grant Mccracken The long interview , 1988 .

[16]  Annamma Joy,et al.  Gift Giving in Hong Kong and the Continuum of Social Ties , 2001 .

[17]  M. Molesworth,et al.  ‘I'll sell this and I'll buy them that’: eBay and the management of possessions as stock , 2009 .

[18]  Russell W. Belk,et al.  Gift Giving as Agapic Love: An Alternative to the Exchange Paradigm Based on Dating Experiences , 1993 .

[19]  D. Cheal The Gift Economy , 1988 .

[20]  R. Hill,et al.  The Homeless in America: An Examination of Possessions and Consumption Behaviors , 1990 .

[21]  M. Giesler,et al.  The Anthropology of File Sharing: Consuming Napster As a Gift , 2003 .

[22]  Jean-Sébastien Marcoux,et al.  Escaping the Gift Economy , 2009 .

[23]  G. Michelson,et al.  ‘No Strings Attached’: Welcoming the Existential Gift in Business , 2011 .

[24]  Eric J. Arnould,et al.  How Individuals’ Cherished Possessions Become Families’ Inalienable Wealth , 2004 .

[25]  Frédéric F. Brunel,et al.  Gift Receipt and the Reformulation of Interpersonal Relationships , 1999 .

[26]  Neeli Bendapudi,et al.  Enhancing Helping Behavior: An Integrative Framework for Promotion Planning , 1996 .

[27]  J. J. F. Sherry Gift Giving in Anthropological Perspective , 1983 .

[28]  M. Giesler Consumer Gift Systems , 2006 .

[29]  Hélène Cherrier Disposal and simple living: exploring the circulation of goods and the development of sacred consumption , 2009 .

[30]  Mark Osteen,et al.  The question of the gift : essays across disciplines , 2002 .

[31]  M. Sahlins Stone Age Economics , 2020 .

[32]  Karen V. Fernandez,et al.  Three paths to disposition: The movement of meaningful possessions to strangers , 2005 .

[33]  D. Bajde Rethinking the social and cultural dimensions of charitable giving , 2009 .

[34]  J. J. F. Sherry A Sociocultural Analysis of a Midwestern American Flea Market , 1990 .

[35]  J. Creswell Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[36]  B. Schwartz,et al.  The Social Psychology of the Gift , 1967, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  William B. Locander,et al.  Putting Consumer Experience Back into Consumer Research: The Philosophy and Method of Existential-Phenomenology , 1989 .

[38]  A. Hirschman,et al.  Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States , 1970 .

[39]  Adrian. Sargeant,et al.  Charitable Giving: Towards a Model of Donor Behaviour , 1999 .

[40]  Catherine A. Roster Letting Go: the Process and Meaning of Dispossession in the Lives of Consumers , 2001 .

[41]  Siok Kuan Tambyah,et al.  Life on the Net: the Reconstruction of Self and Community , 1996 .

[42]  M. Mauss The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies , 1925 .