Cortical Discrimination of Complex Natural Stimuli: Can Single Neurons Match Behavior?

A central finding in many cortical areas is that single neurons can match behavioral performance in the discrimination of sensory stimuli. However, whether this is true for natural behaviors involving complex natural stimuli remains unknown. Here we use the model system of songbirds to address this problem. Specifically, we investigate whether neurons in field L, the homolog of primary auditory cortex, can match behavioral performance in the discrimination of conspecific songs. We use a classification framework based on the (dis)similarity between single spike trains to quantify neural discrimination. We use this framework to investigate the discriminability of single spike trains in field L in response to conspecific songs, testing different candidate neural codes underlying discrimination. We find that performance based on spike timing is significantly higher than performance based on spike rate and interspike intervals. We then assess the impact of temporal correlations in spike trains on discrimination. In contrast to widely discussed effects of correlations in limiting the accuracy of a population code, temporal correlations appear to improve the performance of single neurons in the majority of cases. Finally, we compare neural performance with behavioral performance. We find a diverse range of performance levels in field L, with neural performance matching behavioral accuracy only for the best neurons using a spike-timing-based code.

[1]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  The tempotron: a neuron that learns spike timing–based decisions , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  N. C. Singh,et al.  Selectivity for conspecific song in the zebra finch auditory forebrain. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Christian K. Machens,et al.  Linearity of Cortical Receptive Fields Measured with Natural Sounds , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  J Cynx Conspecific song perception in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). , 1993, Journal of comparative psychology.

[5]  Feng Qi Han,et al.  Cortical Sensitivity to Visual Features in Natural Scenes , 2005, PLoS biology.

[6]  D V Buonomano,et al.  Decoding Temporal Information: A Model Based on Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  G. Laurent,et al.  Who reads temporal information contained across synchronized and oscillatory spike trains? , 1998, Nature.

[8]  Xiaoqin Wang,et al.  Information content of auditory cortical responses to time-varying acoustic stimuli. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Bernhard Ronacher,et al.  Single auditory neurons rapidly discriminate conspecific communication signals , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  Population coding in neuronal systems with correlated noise. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  Jan W. H. Schnupp,et al.  Plasticity of Temporal Pattern Codes for Vocalization Stimuli in Primary Auditory Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Tim Gollisch,et al.  Spike-train variability of auditory neurons in vivo: dynamic responses follow predictions from constant stimuli. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  J. Victor,et al.  Nature and precision of temporal coding in visual cortex: a metric-space analysis. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Anne Hsu,et al.  Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  K. Sen,et al.  Feature analysis of natural sounds in the songbird auditory forebrain. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Peter Dayan,et al.  The Effect of Correlated Variability on the Accuracy of a Population Code , 1999, Neural Computation.

[18]  W. Bialek,et al.  Time Course of Information about Motion Direction in Visual Area MT of Macaque Monkeys , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  William Bialek,et al.  Spike timing and the coding of naturalistic sounds in a central auditory area of songbirds , 2001, NIPS.

[20]  D. Tank,et al.  Persistent neural activity: prevalence and mechanisms , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[21]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[22]  A. Parker,et al.  Sense and the single neuron: probing the physiology of perception. , 1998, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  Kenneth D. Miller,et al.  Adaptive filtering enhances information transmission in visual cortex , 2006, Nature.

[24]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance , 1994, Nature.

[25]  Paul H. E. Tiesinga,et al.  A New Correlation-Based Measure of Spike Timing Reliability , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[26]  Jonathan D. Victor,et al.  Metric-space analysis of spike trains: theory, algorithms and application , 1998, q-bio/0309031.

[27]  I. Nelken,et al.  Responses of Neurons in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex to Bird Chirps: Effects of Temporal and Spectral Context , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Encoding for computation: recognizing brief dynamical patterns by exploiting effects of weak rhythms on action-potential timing. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  William Bialek,et al.  Entropy and Information in Neural Spike Trains , 1996, cond-mat/9603127.

[30]  Virginia Best,et al.  Behavioral and Neural Identification of Birdsong under Several Masking Conditions , 2007 .

[31]  K. Sen,et al.  Spectral-temporal Receptive Fields of Nonlinear Auditory Neurons Obtained Using Natural Sounds , 2022 .

[32]  Mark C. W. van Rossum,et al.  A Novel Spike Distance , 2001, Neural Computation.

[33]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Central auditory onset responses, and temporal asymmetries in auditory perception , 2002, Hearing Research.

[34]  J. Gallant,et al.  Natural Stimulus Statistics Alter the Receptive Field Structure of V1 Neurons , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[36]  W. Newsome,et al.  What electrical microstimulation has revealed about the neural basis of cognition , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[37]  Ayla Ergün,et al.  Delayed inhibition in cortical receptive fields and the discrimination of complex stimuli. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  R. Romo,et al.  Neuronal correlates of sensory discrimination in the somatosensory cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Virginia Best,et al.  Spatial unmasking of birdsong in human listeners: energetic and informational factors. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  R. Mooney,et al.  Synaptic Transformations Underlying Highly Selective Auditory Representations of Learned Birdsong , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Glenn C. Turner,et al.  Oscillations and Sparsening of Odor Representations in the Mushroom Body , 2002, Science.

[42]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Refractoriness and Neural Precision , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Gal Chechik,et al.  Encoding Stimulus Information by Spike Numbers and Mean Response Time in Primary Auditory Cortex , 2005, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[44]  Rajiv Narayan,et al.  Distinct time scales in cortical discrimination of natural sounds in songbirds. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  R Ratnam,et al.  Nonrenewal Statistics of Electrosensory Afferent Spike Trains: Implications for the Detection of Weak Sensory Signals , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  J J Hopfield,et al.  What is a moment? Transient synchrony as a collective mechanism for spatiotemporal integration. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  A. Zador,et al.  Balanced inhibition underlies tuning and sharpens spike timing in auditory cortex , 2003, Nature.

[48]  L. Maler,et al.  Negative Interspike Interval Correlations Increase the Neuronal Capacity for Encoding Time-Dependent Stimuli , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[50]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Cortical representation of auditory space: information-bearing features of spike patterns. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  D. Bradley,et al.  Neural population code for fine perceptual decisions in area MT , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[53]  R. Romo,et al.  Correlated Neuronal Discharges that Increase Coding Efficiency during Perceptual Discrimination , 2003, Neuron.

[54]  Maoz Shamir,et al.  Temporal Coding of Time-Varying Stimuli , 2007, Neural Computation.