Performance Limitations of Observer-Based Feedback for Transient Energy Growth Suppression

Transient energy growth suppression is a common control objective for feedback flow control aimed at delaying transition to turbulence. A prevailing control approach in this context is observer-based feedback, in which a full-state feedback controller is applied to state estimates from an observer. The present study identifies a fundamental performance limitation of observer-based feedback control: whenever the uncontrolled system exhibits transient energy growth in response to optimal disturbances, control by observer-based feedback will necessarily lead to transient energy growth in response to optimal disturbances for the closed-loop system as well. Indeed, this result establishes that observer-based feedback can be a poor candidate for controller synthesis in the context of transient energy growth suppression and transition delay: the performance objective of transient energy growth suppression can never be achieved by means of observer-based feedback. Further, an illustrative example is used to show that alternative forms of output feedback are not necessarily subject to these same performance limitations, and should also be considered in the context of transient energy growth suppression and transition control.

[1]  D. S. Henningson,et al.  Transition delay using control theory , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[2]  Thomas Bewley,et al.  A Linear Systems Approach to Flow Control , 2007 .

[3]  Kathryn M. Butler,et al.  Three‐dimensional optimal perturbations in viscous shear flow , 1992 .

[4]  George Papadakis,et al.  Linear quadratic control of plane Poiseuille flow–the transient behaviour , 2007, Int. J. Control.

[5]  John Kim,et al.  Control of turbulent boundary layers , 2003 .

[6]  F.Martinelli,et al.  Linear feedback control of transient energy growth and control performance limitations in subcritical plane Poiseuille flow , 2011, 1101.2629.

[7]  John E. Prussing,et al.  The principal minor test for semidefinite matrices , 1986 .

[8]  Christina Freytag,et al.  Stability And Transition In Shear Flows , 2016 .

[9]  P. Schmid Nonmodal Stability Theory , 2007 .

[10]  Dan S. Henningson,et al.  Input-Output Analysis and Control Design Applied to a Linear Model of Spatially Developing Flows , 2009 .

[11]  James F. Whidborne,et al.  On the Minimization of Maximum Transient Energy Growth , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[12]  J. Whidborne,et al.  Computing the maximum transient energy growth , 2011 .

[13]  Y S J O S H I,et al.  A systems theory approach to the feedback stabilization of infinitesimal and finite-amplitude disturbances in plane Poiseuille flow , 1997 .

[14]  Luca Brandt,et al.  Feedback Control of Boundary-Layer Bypass Transition: Comparison of Simulations with Experiments , 2010 .

[15]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Linear controller design: limits of performance , 1991 .

[16]  Thomas Bewley,et al.  Optimal and robust control and estimation of linear paths to transition , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  William L. Brogan,et al.  Modern control theory (3rd ed.) , 1991 .

[18]  Anne E. Trefethen,et al.  Hydrodynamic Stability Without Eigenvalues , 1993, Science.

[19]  James F. Whidborne,et al.  Linear feedback control of transient energy growth and control performance limitations in subcritical plane Poiseuille flow , 2011 .

[20]  Thomas Bewley,et al.  Flow control: new challenges for a new Renaissance , 2001 .

[21]  Maziar S. Hemati,et al.  Dynamic mode shaping for fluid flow control: New strategies for transient growth suppression , 2017 .

[22]  Jessika Weiss Stability And Transition In Shear Flows , 2016 .

[23]  Dan S. Henningson,et al.  Output Feedback Control of Blasius Flow with Leading Edge Using Plasma Actuator , 2013 .