Identifying influential neighbors in animal flocking

Schools of fish and flocks of birds can move together in synchrony and decide on new directions of movement in a seamless way. This is possible because group members constantly share directional information with their neighbors. Although detecting the directionality of other group members is known to be important to maintain cohesion, it is not clear how many neighbors each individual can simultaneously track and pay attention to, and what the spatial distribution of these influential neighbors is. Here, we address these questions on shoals of Hemigrammus rhodostomus, a species of fish exhibiting strong schooling behavior. We adopt a data-driven analysis technique based on the study of short-term directional correlations to identify which neighbors have the strongest influence over the participation of an individual in a collective U-turn event. We find that fish mainly react to one or two neighbors at a time. Moreover, we find no correlation between the distance rank of a neighbor and its likelihood to be influential. We interpret our results in terms of fish allocating sequential and selective attention to their neighbors.

[1]  D. Ingle Two visual mechanisms underlying the behavior of fish , 1967, Psychologische Forschung.

[2]  H. Chaté,et al.  Relevance of metric-free interactions in flocking phenomena. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[3]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[4]  Tamás Vicsek,et al.  Flocking algorithm for autonomous flying robots , 2013, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[5]  James J. Anderson,et al.  Collective motion in animal groups from a neurobiological perspective: the adaptive benefits of dynamic sensory loads and selective attention. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  D. M. Guthrie Role of Vision in Fish Behaviour , 1986 .

[7]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[8]  Neha Bhooshan,et al.  The Simulation of the Movement of Fish Schools , 2001 .

[9]  A. Pérez-Escudero,et al.  A common rule for decision making in animal collectives across species , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Sachit Butail,et al.  A jump persistent turning walker to model zebrafish locomotion , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[11]  Qi Zhao,et al.  Automated 3D trajectory measuring of large numbers of moving particles. , 2011, Optics express.

[12]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Fast and accurate decisions through collective vigilance in fish shoals , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Domino-like propagation of collective U-turns in fish schools , 2017, bioRxiv.

[14]  I. Aoki A simulation study on the schooling mechanism in fish. , 1982 .

[15]  D L Meyer,et al.  The Mauthner-initiated startle response in teleost fish. , 1977, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  José Halloy,et al.  A stochastic vision-based model inspired by zebrafish collective behaviour in heterogeneous environments , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.

[17]  Giorgio Parisi,et al.  Spatially balanced topological interaction grants optimal cohesion in flocking models , 2012, Interface Focus.

[18]  Kevin Buchin,et al.  Visual analytics of delays and interaction in movement data , 2017, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Daniel W Franks,et al.  Limited interactions in flocks: relating model simulations to empirical data , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[20]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks , 2010, Nature.

[21]  Colin R. Twomey,et al.  Visual sensory networks and effective information transfer in animal groups , 2013, Current Biology.

[22]  E A Codling,et al.  Group navigation and the "many-wrongs principle" in models of animal movement. , 2007, Ecology.

[23]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[24]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  From behavioural analyses to models of collective motion in fish schools , 2012, Interface Focus.

[25]  James J. Anderson,et al.  Motion-guided attention promotes adaptive communications during social navigation , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  F. Heppner,et al.  Laboratory determination of startle reaction time of the starling (Sturnus vulgaris) , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Disentangling and modeling interactions in fish with burst-and-coast swimming reveal distinct alignment and attraction behaviors , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[28]  I. Couzin,et al.  Emergent Sensing of Complex Environments by Mobile Animal Groups , 2013, Science.

[29]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Context-dependent hierarchies in pigeons , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  A. Czirók,et al.  Collective Motion , 1999, physics/9902023.

[31]  J. Krause,et al.  The role of individuality in collective group movement , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Marc Holderied,et al.  Delayed Response and Biosonar Perception Explain Movement Coordination in Trawling Bats , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[33]  I. Couzin,et al.  Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Horst Bleckmann,et al.  Reaction time and stimulus frequency in prey localization in the surface-feeding fishAplocheilus lineatus , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[36]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Deciphering Interactions in Moving Animal Groups , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[37]  Hiro-Sato Niwa Self-organizing Dynamic Model of Fish Schooling , 1994 .

[38]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  Tamás Vicsek,et al.  Corrigendum: Flocking algorithm for autonomous flying robots (2014 Bioinspir. Biomim. 9 025012) , 2014 .

[40]  Thomas J. McKetterick,et al.  Exact dynamics of stochastic linear delayed systems: application to spatiotemporal coordination of comoving agents. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[41]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Inferring the rules of interaction of shoaling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Michael H. Dickinson,et al.  Multi-camera real-time three-dimensional tracking of multiple flying animals , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[43]  A. Pérez-Escudero,et al.  idTracker: tracking individuals in a group by automatic identification of unmarked animals , 2014, Nature Methods.