The levels of conceptual interoperability model: applying systems engineering principles to M&S

This paper describes the use of the Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model (LCIM) as a framework for conceptual modeling and its descriptive and prescriptive uses. LCIM is applied to show its potential and shortcomings in the current simulation interoperability approaches, in particular the High Level Architecture (HLA) and Base Object Models (BOM). It emphasizes the need to apply rigorous engineering methods and principles and replace ad-hoc approaches.

[1]  Marko A. Hofmann Challenges of Model Interoperation in Military Simulations , 2004, Simul..

[2]  Yifan Zhu,et al.  Three-dimensional conceptual model for service-oriented simulation , 2009, ArXiv.

[3]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  M&S within the Model Driven Architecture , 2004 .

[4]  Paul Gustavson,et al.  Building composable bridges between the conceptual space and the implementation space , 2007, 2007 Winter Simulation Conference.

[5]  Leslie S. Winters,et al.  Composable M&S Web Services for Net-Centric Applications , 2006 .

[6]  Mikel D. Petty,et al.  Models, composability, and validity , 2004 .

[7]  Sponsor Siso Draft Standard for Modeling and Simulation (M&S) High Level Architecture (HLA)—Object Model Template (OMT) Specification , 2008 .

[8]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Mathematical models towards self-organizing formal federation languages based on conceptual models of information exchange capabilities , 2008, 2008 Winter Simulation Conference.

[9]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  Modeling & Simulation-Based Data Engineering: Introducing Pragmatics into Ontologies for Net-Centric Information Exchange , 2007 .

[10]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Taxonomies, Ontologies, Battle Management Languages - Recommendations for the Coalition BML Study Group , 2005 .

[11]  Qun Li,et al.  Service-oriented high level architecture , 2009, ArXiv.

[12]  Katherine L Morse,et al.  HLA Evolved – A Summary of Major Technical Improvements , 2008 .

[13]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  A Layered Approach to Composition and Interoperation in Complex Systems , 2009, Complex Systems in Knowledge-based Environments.

[14]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Implied ontological representation within the levels of conceptual interoperability model , 2008, Intell. Decis. Technol..

[15]  Birger Andersson,et al.  BOM++, a semantically enriched BOM , 2008 .

[16]  松田 直人 『Google Scholar』の利点 , 2009 .

[17]  Steffen Straßburger,et al.  Future Trends in Distributed Simulation and Distributed Virtual Environments , 2009 .

[18]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  What Comes After the Semantic Web - PADS Implications for the Dynamic Web , 2006, 20th Workshop on Principles of Advanced and Distributed Simulation (PADS'06).

[19]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  Devs unified process for integrated development and testing of service oriented architectures , 2007 .

[20]  Xin Chen,et al.  High level architecture evolved modular federation object model , 2009, ArXiv.

[21]  Gary Tan,et al.  A Rule-based Approach to Syntactic and Semantic Composition of BOMs , 2007 .

[22]  Paul K. Davis,et al.  Improving the Composability of Department of Defense Models and Simulations , 2004 .

[23]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  The Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model , 2003 .

[24]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  Modelling and simulation methodology in the artificial intelligence era. , 1986 .

[25]  Wei-Tek Tsai,et al.  Ddsos: a dynamic distributed service-oriented modeling and simulation framework , 2006 .

[26]  Daniel Plakosh,et al.  System of Systems Interoperability (SOSI): Final Report , 2004 .

[27]  Stewart Robinson,et al.  Conceptual modelling for simulation Part I: definition and requirements , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..