Effective robot team control methodologies for battlefield applications

In this paper, we present algorithms and display concepts that allow Soldiers to efficiently interact with a robotic swarm that is participating in a representative convoy mission. A critical aspect of swarm control, especially in disrupted or degraded conditions, is Soldier-swarm interaction-the Soldier must be kept cognizant of swarm operations through an interface that allows him or her to monitor status and/or institute corrective actions. We provide a control method for the swarm that adapts easily to changing battlefield conditions, metrics and supervisory algorithms that enable swarm members to economically monitor changes in swarm status as they execute the mission, and display concepts that can efficiently and effectively communicate swarm status to Soldiers in challenging battlefield environments.

[1]  Baris Fidan,et al.  Aggregation, Foraging, and Formation Control of Swarms with Non-Holonomic Agents Using Potential Functions and Sliding Mode Techniques ∗† , 2007 .

[2]  Shuzhi Sam Ge,et al.  Swarm formations using the general formation potential function , 2004, IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics, 2004..

[3]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[4]  G.H. Elkaim,et al.  A lightweight formation control methodology for a swarm of non-holonomic vehicles , 2006, 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[5]  George J. Pappas,et al.  Leader-Follower Formations: Uncalibrated Vision-Based Localization and Control , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Controlling Swarms of Robots Using Interpolated Implicit Functions , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Kimon P. Valavanis,et al.  Swarm Formation Control Utilizing Elliptical Surfaces and Limiting Functions , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[8]  R. Ordonez,et al.  Swarm Tracking Using Artificial Potentials and Sliding Mode Control , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[9]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Modeling and control of formations of nonholonomic mobile robots , 2001, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Shuzhi Sam Ge,et al.  Queues and artificial potential trenches for multirobot formations , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[11]  Veysel Gazi,et al.  Swarm aggregations using artificial potentials and sliding-mode control , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[12]  Seiichi Shin,et al.  Decentralized Control of Autonomous Swarm Systems Using Artificial Potential Functions: Analytical Design Guidelines , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[13]  Tucker R. Balch,et al.  Social potentials for scalable multi-robot formations , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[14]  Stacey D. Scott,et al.  Modified Cooper Harper Evaluation Tool for Unmanned Vehicle Displays , 2022 .

[15]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Virtual leaders, artificial potentials and coordinated control of groups , 2001, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.01CH37228).

[16]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  DISTRIBUTED COOPERATIVE CONTROL OF MULTIPLE VEHICLE FORMATIONS USING STRUCTURAL POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS , 2002 .

[17]  Susan G. Hill,et al.  Designing and Evaluating a Multimodal Interface for Soldier-Swarm Interaction , 2009 .

[18]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  A general algorithm for robot formations using local sensing and minimal communication , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[19]  Guangming Xie,et al.  Leader-following formation control of multiple mobile vehicles , 2007 .