Temporal control of conditioned responding in goldfish.

The peak procedure was used to characterize response timing during acquisition and maintenance of conditioned responding in goldfish. Subjects received light-shock pairings with a 5- or 15-s interstimulus interval. On interspersed peak trials, the conditioned stimulus light was presented for 45 s and no shock was delivered. Peaks in the conditioned response, general activity, occurred at about the time of the expected unconditioned stimulus, and variability in the activity distribution was scalar. Modeling of the changes in the activity distributions over sessions revealed that the temporal features of the conditioned response changed very little during acquisition. The data suggest that times are learned early in training, and, contrary to I. P. Pavlov's (1927/1960) concept of "inhibition of delay," that timing is learning when to respond rather than learning when not to respond.

[1]  M. Bitterman,et al.  Extinction in the fish after partial and consistent reinforcement with number of reinforcements equated. , 1962, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[2]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Classical eyelid conditioning as a function of sustained and shifted interstimulus intervals , 1963 .

[3]  I. Gormezano,et al.  CONDITIONING OF THE NICTITATING MEMBRANE OF THE RABBIT AS A FUNCTION OF CS-US INTERVAL. , 1964, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[4]  M. Bitterman CLASSICAL CONDITIONING IN THE GOLDFISH AS A FUNCTION OF THE CS-US INTERVAL. , 1964, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[5]  M. Bitterman,et al.  AVOIDANCE-CONDITIONING IN THE FISH: FURTHER STUDIES OF THE CS-US INTERVAL. , 1964, The American journal of psychology.

[6]  G. Ellison,et al.  DIFFERENTIAL SALIVARY CONDITIONING TO TRACES. , 1964, Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology.

[7]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Classical conditioning : a symposium , 1965 .

[8]  P ROZIN Temperature Independence of an Arbitrary Temporal Discrimination in the Goldfish , 1965, Science.

[9]  B A Schneider,et al.  A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  S. R. Coleman,et al.  Classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response at backward, simultaneous, and forward CS-US intervals. , 1969, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[11]  A. Brownstein,et al.  Interresponse time duration in fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement: control by ordinal position and time since reinforcement. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  W. N. Schoenfeld The Theory of reinforcement schedules , 1970 .

[13]  R. Church,et al.  Magnitude of fear as a function of expected time to all aversive event , 1974 .

[14]  J. Gibbon Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. , 1977 .

[15]  H. Terrace,et al.  Autoshaping and Conditioning Theory , 1980 .

[16]  A G Barto,et al.  Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: expectation and prediction. , 1981, Psychological review.

[17]  M. Davis,et al.  Temporal specificity of fear conditioning: effects of different conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus intervals on the fear-potentiated startle effect. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[18]  John H. Wearden,et al.  Do humans possess an internal clock with scalar timing properties , 1991 .

[19]  M. Mauk,et al.  Cerebellar cortex lesions disrupt learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  R. Church,et al.  Application of scalar timing theory to individual trials. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[21]  M. Mauk,et al.  Extinction of conditioned eyelid responses requires the anterior lobe of cerebellar cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  R. Bevins,et al.  One-trial context fear conditioning as a function of the interstimulus interval , 1995 .

[23]  J. M. Rosas,et al.  Temporal Discrimination and Forgetting of CS Duration in Conditioned Suppression , 1996 .

[24]  J. Gibbon,et al.  Scalar expectancy theory and peak-interval timing in humans. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[25]  M. Mauk,et al.  Pharmacological analysis of cerebellar contributions to the timing and expression of conditioned eyelid responses , 1998, Neuropharmacology.

[26]  M. Mauk,et al.  Cerebellar Cortex Lesions Prevent Acquisition of Conditioned Eyelid Responses , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  J. Gibbon,et al.  Temporal control during maintenance and extinction of conditioned keypecking in ring doves , 1999 .

[28]  M. Mauk,et al.  Simulations of Cerebellar Motor Learning: Computational Analysis of Plasticity at the Mossy Fiber to Deep Nucleus Synapse , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  L. E. Talton,et al.  Interval schedule performance in the goldfish Carassius auratus , 1999, Behavioural Processes.

[30]  Javier F. Medina,et al.  Timing Mechanisms in the Cerebellum: Testing Predictions of a Large-Scale Computer Simulation , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Time, rate, and conditioning. , 2000, Psychological review.

[32]  Kimberly S. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Independent effects of stimulus and cycle duration in conditioning: The role of timing processes , 2000 .

[33]  M. Mauk,et al.  Latent Acquisition of Timed Responses in Cerebellar Cortex , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Some Constraints for Models of Timing: A Temporal Coding Hypothesis Perspective , 2002 .

[35]  P. Balsam,et al.  Timing at the Start of Associative Learning , 2002 .