Improving the screening criteria for blunt cerebrovascular injury: the appropriate role for computed tomography angiography.

BACKGROUND Screening criteria and diagnostic methods for blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) are evolving. Using current screening guidelines, up to 20% of injuries are not recognized until symptoms occur, and thus missing the therapeutic window. All patients who meet screening criteria at our institution undergo angiography due to conflicting sensitivity data reported for computed tomographic angiography (CTA). We sought to refine screening criteria for BCVI to optimize patient care. METHODS All trauma admissions screened for BCVI over a 29-month period ending May 2009 were analyzed. Thirty-two channel CTA was obtained during initial radiologic evaluation. Patients underwent angiography for conventional screening criteria or abnormal CTA. Demographics, criteria for BCVI screening, fracture patterns, associated injuries, and results of CTA and angiography were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 748 patients were screened, 143 injuries (78 carotid and 65 vertebral) were diagnosed in 117 patients (16%). Nineteen of the 117 patients (16%) with BCVI had no conventional criteria and were only screened for CTA abnormalities. One patient developed neurologic symptoms subsequent to initial evaluation with no conventional screening criteria or CTA findings. CONCLUSIONS The conventional screening criteria identify most patients with BCVI (84%). CTA as a screening criterion captures nearly all remaining patients before symptoms developing. This allows for detection and treatment of injuries in patients that otherwise would be missed until symptomatic. CTA should be part of the radiologic evaluation for potential head, neck, and facial injuries. Unfortunately, CTA is not sensitive enough to reliably detect injuries, but should be added as a screening criterion. Angiography remains the gold standard for BCVI diagnosis.

[1]  T. Scalea,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: does treatment always matter? , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  T. Fabian,et al.  Blunt carotid injury. Importance of early diagnosis and anticoagulant therapy. , 1996 .

[3]  D. Leung,et al.  Computed Tomographic Angiography for the Diagnosis of Blunt Carotid/Vertebral Artery Injury: A Note of Caution , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[4]  Cliff Rice.  Screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries is cost-effective , 2006 .

[5]  T. Fabian,et al.  Prospective Screening for Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries: Analysis of Diagnostic Modalities and Outcomes , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[6]  B. Starnes,et al.  Vascular trauma: endovascular management and techniques. , 2007, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[7]  S. Norwood,et al.  The high morbidity of blunt cerebrovascular injury in an unscreened population: more evidence of the need for mandatory screening protocols. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[8]  E. Moore,et al.  Anticoagulation is the gold standard therapy for blunt carotid injuries to reduce stroke rate. , 2004, Archives of surgery.

[9]  D. R. Brown,et al.  Utility of screening for blunt vascular neck injuries with computed tomographic angiography. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  J. Jarvik,et al.  Sixteen-slice CT angiography in patients with suspected blunt carotid and vertebral artery injuries. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[11]  Ernest E. Moore,et al.  Blunt Carotid and Vertebral Arterial Injuries , 2001, World Journal of Surgery.

[12]  A. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Identifying patients at risk for intracranial and extracranial blunt carotid injuries. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[13]  E. Moore,et al.  Blunt carotid arterial injuries: implications of a new grading scale. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[14]  S. Norwood,et al.  Sixteen-slice multi-detector computed tomographic angiography improves the accuracy of screening for blunt cerebrovascular injury. , 2006, The Journal of trauma.

[15]  D. Magee,et al.  Computed tomographic angiography versus conventional angiography for the diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injury in trauma patients. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[16]  T. Egglin,et al.  Sixteen-slice computed tomographic angiography is a reliable noninvasive screening test for clinically significant blunt cerebrovascular injuries. , 2006, The Journal of trauma.

[17]  Wilkins,et al.  Western Trauma Association critical decisions in trauma: screening for and treatment of blunt cerebrovascular injuries. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[18]  E. Moore,et al.  The unrecognized epidemic of blunt carotid arterial injuries: early diagnosis improves neurologic outcome. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[19]  E. Moore,et al.  Cervical spine fracture patterns predictive of blunt vertebral artery injury. , 2003, The Journal of trauma.

[20]  S. Norwood,et al.  Internal carotid artery stenting for blunt carotid artery injuries with an associated pseudoaneurysm. , 2008, The Journal of trauma.

[21]  E. Moore,et al.  Optimizing screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries. , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[22]  M. Schreiber,et al.  Blunt cerebrovascular injury practice management guidelines: the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[23]  D. Mozingo.  Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury Screening With 32-Channel Multidetector Computed Tomography: More Slices Still Don't Cut It , 2011 .

[24]  Alexander L. Eastman,et al.  Computed tomographic angiography for the diagnosis of blunt cervical vascular injury: is it ready for primetime? , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[25]  C. Sliker,et al.  Diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injuries with 16-MDCT: accuracy of whole-body MDCT compared with neck MDCT angiography. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.