Evolution of project-based learning in small groups in environmental engineering courses

This work presents the assessment of the development and evolution of an active methodology (Project-Based Learning –PBL-) implemented on the course “Unit Operations in Environmental Engineering”, within the bachelor’s degree in Environmental Engineering, with the purpose of decreasing the dropout rate in this course. After the initial design and implementation of this methodology during the first academic year (12/13), different modifications were adopted in the following ones (13-14, 14-15 & 15-16) in order to optimize the student’s and professor’s work load as well as correct some malfunctions observed in the initial design of the PBL. This active methodology seeks to make students the main architects of their own learning processes. Accordingly, they have to identify their learning needs, which is a highly motivating approach both for their curricular development and for attaining the required learning outcomes in this field of knowledge. The results obtained show that working in small teams (cooperative work) enhances each group member’s self–learning capabilities. Moreover, academic marks improve when compared to traditional learning methodologies. Nevertheless, the implementation of more active methodologies, such as project-based learning, in small groups has certain specific characteristics. In this case it has been implemented simultaneously in two different groups of 10 students each one. Such small groups are more heterogeneoussince the presence of two highly motivated students or not can vary or affect the whole group’s attitude and academic results.

[1]  Henna Asikainen Successful learning and studying in Biosciences : Exploring how students conceptions of learning, approaches to learning, motivation and their experiences of the teaching-learning environment are related to study success , 2014 .

[2]  France Cheong,et al.  Using a Problem-Based Learning Approach to Teach an Intelligent Systems Course , 2008, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[3]  Susan B. Lucas,et al.  Design and analysis of questionnaires for survey skills in chemical engineering , 2011 .

[4]  Víctor Manuel López Pastor,et al.  Best practices in academic assessment in higher education , 2011 .

[5]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  A Student-Centered Approach to Teaching Material and Energy Balances 2: Course Delivery and Assessment , 2007 .

[6]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases , 2006 .

[7]  N. Remziye Ergül,et al.  The Effect of Project based Learning on Students’ Science Success , 2014 .

[8]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  A Critical Discussion of Deep and Surface Processing: What It Means, How It Is Measured, the Role of Context, and Model Specification , 2012 .

[9]  H. Barrows Problem‐based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview , 1996 .

[10]  Rebecca Brent,et al.  Cooperative Learning in Technical Courses: Procedures, Pitfalls, and Payoffs. , 1994 .

[11]  Douladeli Efstratia,et al.  Experiential Education through Project Based Learning , 2014 .

[12]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  A Student-Centered Approach to Teaching Material and Energy Balances 1. Course Design. , 2007 .

[13]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  Active-Inductive-Cooperative Learning: An Instructional Model for Chemistry?. , 1996 .

[14]  C. Hmelo‐Silver Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? , 2004 .

[15]  Alexis J. Walker Cooperative Learning in the College Classroom , 1996 .

[16]  David Gijbels,et al.  Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: a review of the literature , 2015, Advances in Health Sciences Education.

[17]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom‐Based Practices , 2005 .

[18]  Óscar Mas Torelló El profesor universitario: sus competencias y formación. , 2011 .