Quantifying the higher-order influence of scientific publications

Citation impact is commonly assessed using direct, first-order citation relations. We consider here instead the indirect influence of publications on new publications via citations. We present a novel method to quantify the higher-order citation influence of publications, considering both direct, or first-order, and indirect, or higher-order citations. In particular, we are interested in higher-order citation influence at the level of disciplines. We apply this method to the whole Web of Science data at the level of disciplines. We find that a significant amount of influence—42%—stems from higher-order citations. Furthermore, we show that higher-order citation influence is helpful to quantify and visualize citation flows among disciplines, and to assess their degree of interdisciplinarity.

[1]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Diana Lucio-Arias,et al.  Main-path analysis and path-dependent transitions in HistCite™-based historiograms , 2008 .

[3]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience , 2009, Scientometrics.

[4]  Daniel Jurafsky,et al.  Measuring the Evolution of a Scientific Field through Citation Frames , 2018, TACL.

[5]  Alexis-Michel Mugabushaka,et al.  Bibliometric indicators of interdisciplinarity: the potential of the Leinster–Cobbold diversity indices to study disciplinary diversity , 2016, Scientometrics.

[6]  LeydesdorffLoet,et al.  Main-path analysis and path-dependent transitions in HistCite-based historiograms , 2008 .

[7]  Jordan L. Boyd-Graber,et al.  Measuring discursive influence across scholarship , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Vincent A. Traag,et al.  Quantifying the long-term influence of scientific publications , 2019, International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics.

[9]  Massimo Franceschet,et al.  PageRank , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[10]  I. Ràfols,et al.  Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity , 2015, PloS one.

[11]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[12]  Yi-Ning Tu,et al.  Constructing conceptual trajectory maps to trace the development of research fields , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Follow the leader: Documents on the leading edge of semantic change get more citations , 2019, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[15]  Calyampudi R. Rao Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach☆ , 1982 .

[16]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  THE USE OF CITATION DATA IN WRITING THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE , 1964 .

[17]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  Andreas Thor,et al.  Introducing CitedReferencesExplorer (CRExplorer): A program for reference publication year spectroscopy with cited references standardization , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[19]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Toward a consensus map of science , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  Alexander I. Pudovkin,et al.  Why do we need algorithmic historiography? , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Qi Wang,et al.  Consistency and validity of interdisciplinarity measures , 2018, Quantitative Science Studies.

[22]  Diana Lucio-Arias,et al.  Main-path analysis and path-dependent transitions in HistCiteTM-based historiograms , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping , 2009, Scientometrics.

[24]  R. Merton Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. , 1957 .

[25]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  CitNetExplorer: A new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[26]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time , 2009, Scientometrics.

[27]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  PageRank-Related Methods for Analyzing Citation Networks , 2014 .

[28]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Intermediacy of publications , 2020, Royal Society Open Science.