Ocean Monitoring Framework based on Compressive Sensing using Acoustic Sensor Networks

This paper presents a framework for spatiotemporal monitoring of ocean environment using large-scale underwater acoustic sensor networks (UWASNs). Our goal is to exploit low-cost, battery-operated technology for acoustic communication to enable long-term, mass deployment of UWASNs for a wide range of monitoring applications in need of high spatio-temporal sampling rate and near real-time data delivery. Inspired by theory of compressive sensing (CS), the framework supports opportunistic random deployment of sensor nodes and relies on random channel access to harvest their data and construct spatio-temporal fields of the underlying sensed phenomena. In order to save bandwidth and energy, we consider a positioning scheme in which the sensor nodes remain silent and just listen for beacon signals from few reference nodes to localize themselves. After this initial localization phase, the sensing process begins. At regular intervals (frames), a set of random sensors sample their transducers and independently try to transmit their measurements to a fusion center (FC) for CS-based field reconstruction. Due to this random access of the acoustic channel, some of the packets may collide at the FC, wasting both energy and bandwidth. For slowly varying fields, consecutive frames have high correlations. We exploit this information during the field reconstruction, and show by simulation results that the number of sensors participating in each frame can be reduced drastically. This decreases the number of collisions at the FC, thus saving energy and prolonging the life-time of the network.

[1]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Challenges for efficient communication in underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2004, SIGBED.

[2]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[3]  C. Karakus,et al.  Analysis of Energy Efficiency of Compressive Sensing in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2013, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[4]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Underwater acoustic networks , 2000, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[5]  Marc Teboulle,et al.  A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[6]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[7]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Compressive wireless sensing , 2006, 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[8]  Ian J. Wassell,et al.  Energy efficient signal acquisition via compressive sensing in wireless sensor networks , 2011, International Symposium on Wireless and Pervasive Computing.

[9]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  Wireless sensor network localization techniques , 2007, Comput. Networks.

[10]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[11]  Gongliang Liu,et al.  Dual-Domain Compressed Sensing Method for Oceanic Environmental Elements Collection with Underwater Sensor Networks , 2017, Mobile Networks and Applications.

[12]  Qu Fengzhong,et al.  A survey of ranging algorithms and localization schemes in underwater acoustic sensor network , 2016, China Communications.

[13]  Xiuzhen Cheng,et al.  Silent Positioning in Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[14]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Sparse Reconstruction by Separable Approximation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[15]  Yuriy V. Zakharov,et al.  TDA-MAC: TDMA Without Clock Synchronization in Underwater Acoustic Networks , 2018, IEEE Access.

[16]  João M. F. Xavier,et al.  Simple and Fast Convex Relaxation Method for Cooperative Localization in Sensor Networks Using Range Measurements , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[17]  Wen Hu,et al.  Energy efficient information collection in wireless sensor networks using adaptive compressive sensing , 2009, 2009 IEEE 34th Conference on Local Computer Networks.

[18]  E. Candes,et al.  11-magic : Recovery of sparse signals via convex programming , 2005 .

[19]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Underwater sensor networks: applications, advances and challenges , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  Gongliang Liu,et al.  IDMA-Based Compressed Sensing for Ocean Monitoring Information Acquisition with Sensor Networks , 2014 .

[21]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[22]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Overview of networking protocols for underwater wireless communications , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[23]  Jean-Marie Becker,et al.  Augmented Lagrangian without alternating directions: Practical algorithms for inverse problems in imaging , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[24]  Xiaodai Dong,et al.  Multiple Access and Data Reconstruction in Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Compressed Sensing , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[25]  Simon A. Dobson,et al.  Energy-Efficient Sensing in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Compressed Sensing , 2014, Sensors.

[26]  L. El Ghaoui,et al.  Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[27]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Computational Methods for Sparse Solution of Linear Inverse Problems , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[28]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Random Access Compressed Sensing for Energy-Efficient Underwater Sensor Networks , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[29]  Xiuzhen Cheng,et al.  TPS: a time-based positioning scheme for outdoor wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.