Visually induced gait deviations during different locomotion speeds

Abstract. Optic flow is essential for the perception of self motion and the control of path integration during locomotion. Inverting prisms oriented 15° off vertical in the roll plane were used to experimentally distort optic flow during locomotion. Depending on the direction in which the prisms were rotated, optic flow was diagonally upward to the right or upward to the left. A reproducible deviation of gait toward the direction of perceived optic flow was found in ten healthy subjects. This deviation is explained to be a gait deviation that compensates for misleading perceived self motion induced by optic flow. The amount of deviation was dependent on locomotion speed. When walking slowly (about 1 m/s), mean deviation was 0.22±0.08 m/s to the right and –0.18±0.08 m/s to the left for right and left, respectively, diagonal prism orientation. Deviation was significantly less when running (about 3 m/s) with mean deviations of 0.05±0.03 m/s and –0.06±0.03 m/s, respectively (ANOVA, P<0.01). It is assumed that path integration during running is largely achieved by highly automated spinal programs operating independently of sensory control. In contrast, walking is more dependent on afferent and reafferent visual control. Thus, the experiments show that visual control of locomotion is direction specific and dependent on optic-flow-induced vection. It becomes less influential with increasing speed of locomotion, e.g., when walking in contrast to running.

[1]  D. Armstrong The supraspinal control of mammalian locomotion. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  R. Held,et al.  Moving Visual Scenes Influence the Apparent Direction of Gravity , 1972, Science.

[3]  W J Davis,et al.  Locomotion: Control by Positive-Feedback Optokinetic Responses , 1972, Science.

[4]  David N. Lee Visual proprioceptive control of stance , 1975 .

[5]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Guidance of locomotion on foot uses perceived target location rather than optic flow , 1998, Current Biology.

[6]  G. Melvill Jones,et al.  Postural adaptation to prolonged optical reversal of vision in man , 1980, Brain Research.

[7]  K Matsuyama,et al.  Stimulation of a restricted region in the midline cerebellar white matter evokes coordinated quadrupedal locomotion in the decerebrate cat. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  J. Lackner,et al.  Visual Stimulation Affects the Perception of Voluntary Leg Movements during Walking , 1988, Perception.

[9]  Thomas Brandt,et al.  Differential effects of vestibular stimulation on walking and running , 2000, Neuroreport.

[10]  W. Berger,et al.  Visual influence on human locomotion Modulation to changes in optic flow , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  M W Greenlee,et al.  Human cortical areas underlying the perception of optic flow: brain imaging studies. , 2000, International review of neurobiology.

[12]  R. Held,et al.  The role of vision in gravitational orientation. , 1975, Fortschritte der Zoologie.

[13]  T. Brandt,et al.  You are better off running than walking with acute vestibulopathy , 1999, The Lancet.

[14]  Shik Ml,et al.  Control of walking and running by means of electric stimulation of the midbrain , 1966 .

[15]  William H. Waller,et al.  PROGRESSION MOVEMENTS ELICITED BY SUBTHALAMIC STIMULATION , 1940 .

[16]  V. Dietz Human neuronal control of automatic functional movements: interaction between central programs and afferent input. , 1992, Physiological reviews.

[17]  C. Assaiante,et al.  Discrete visual samples may control locomotor equilibrium and foot positioning in man. , 1989, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  Daniel J. Hannon,et al.  Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical flow , 1988, Nature.

[19]  J. Konczak Effects of optic flow on the kinematics of human gait: a comparison of young and older adults. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  A. Prochazka,et al.  Muscular sense is attenuated when humans move , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  S. Rossignol,et al.  Visuomotor regulation of locomotion. , 1996, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[22]  W. McIlroy,et al.  SENSORI-SENSORY AFFERENT CONDITIONING WITH LEG MOVEMENT: GAIN CONTROL IN SPINAL REFLEX AND ASCENDING PATHS , 1997, Progress in Neurobiology.

[23]  J. Thomson Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  W. Warren,et al.  The role of central and peripheral vision in postural control duringwalking , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  J. Gibson Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. , 1998, British journal of psychology.

[26]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Humans combine the optic flow with static depth cues for robust perception of heading , 1994, Vision Research.

[27]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Sensitivity of H-reflexes and stretch reflexes to presynaptic inhibition in humans. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  M. L. Shik,et al.  Neurophysiology of locomotor automatism. , 1976, Physiological reviews.