Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis at Least 40 Years After Surgery
暂无分享,去创建一个
S. Ohtori | Y. Matsuura | Takane Suzuki | K. Inage | S. Orita | Y. Eguchi | Yasuhiro Shiga | J. Nakamura | T. Akazawa | T. Kotani | Tsuyoshi Sakuma | S. Minami | H. Niki | M. Iinuma | Atsuhiro Yoshida | Yasushi Iijima | Yoshiaki Torii | Jun Ueno | Tasuku Umehara | Ken Tomochika
[1] M. Farshad,et al. Extreme long-term outcome of operatively versus conservatively treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis , 2020, European Spine Journal.
[2] W. Chau,et al. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients from surgery to after 30 years using SRS-22 questionnaire , 2020, Spine Deformity.
[3] M. Yaszemski,et al. Minimum 20-Year Health-Related Quality of Life and Surgical Rates After the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. , 2019, Spine deformity.
[4] D. Togawa,et al. Minimum Clinically Important Differences in Oswestry Disability Index Domains and Their Impact on Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery , 2018, Asian spine journal.
[5] S. Ohtori,et al. Midlife changes of health-related quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent spinal fusion during adolescence , 2018, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.
[6] Byung-Cheul Shin,et al. Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in Pain, Functional, and Quality of Life Scales in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients , 2017, Spine.
[7] J. Sanders,et al. Selection of the Lowest Level for Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2015, Spine deformity.
[8] Kazuhisa Takahashi,et al. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis 21 to 41 Years Later , 2012, Spine.
[9] T. Mayer,et al. Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum? , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.
[10] P. Huddleston. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and Pain Scales , 2009 .
[11] S. Berven,et al. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. , 2008, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.
[12] Peter Croft,et al. Interpreting Change Scores for Pain and Functional Status in Low Back Pain: Towards International Consensus Regarding Minimal Important Change , 2008, Spine.
[13] H. Hashimoto,et al. Validation of a Japanese Version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire Among Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients in Japan , 2007, Spine.
[14] H. Hashimoto,et al. Discriminative validity and responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index among Japanese outpatients with lumbar conditions , 2006, European Spine Journal.
[15] A. Nachemson,et al. Back Pain and Function 23 Years After Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Case-Control Study—Part II , 2003, Spine.
[16] S. Fukuhara,et al. Validation of the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.
[17] D. Burton,et al. The Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire for Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2003, Spine.
[18] U. Liljenqvist,et al. Quality of life and back pain: outcome 16.7 years after Harrington instrumentation. , 2002, Spine.
[19] J. Fairbank. Use of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) , 1995, Spine.
[20] M. Roland,et al. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. , 1983, Spine.