Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis at Least 40 Years After Surgery

Study Design. Retrospective study. Objective. The aim was to clarify the health-related quality of life (QOL) of patients who had adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) at a minimum of 40 years after surgery. Summary of Background Data. The postoperative health-related QOL of middle-aged patients with AIS has been reported to be good, but that of middle-aged and older patients with AIS has yet to be completely explored. Materials and Methods. We included 179 patients with AIS who underwent spinal fusion(s) between 1968 and 1982. We conducted three surveys in 2009, 2014, and 2022. Patients self-administered both the Scoliosis Research Society-22 and the Roland-Morris Disability questionnaires three times (in 2009, 2014, and 2022) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire was self-administered in 2014 and 2022. We considered patients who responded to all three surveys in 2009, 2014, and 2022. Results. For the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaires, no significant differences were detected among the three time points (2009, 2014, and 2022) for total scores, function domain, pain domain, self-image domain, mental domain, or satisfaction domain. The results of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire were also not significantly different among the surveys over time. The ODI questionnaires revealed a significant worsening of the 2022 results compared with the 2014 results. Eight patients (29.6%) who had an ODI deterioration of 10% or more had numerically fewer mobile lumbar disks than those with <10% deterioration of the ODI, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion. Among patients with AIS who underwent spinal fusion(s) between 1968 and 1982, we found health-related QOL to be maintained over the last 13 years. Relatively good QOL was appreciated in this population of patients who are now middle-aged and older.

[1]  M. Farshad,et al.  Extreme long-term outcome of operatively versus conservatively treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis , 2020, European Spine Journal.

[2]  W. Chau,et al.  Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients from surgery to after 30 years using SRS-22 questionnaire , 2020, Spine Deformity.

[3]  M. Yaszemski,et al.  Minimum 20-Year Health-Related Quality of Life and Surgical Rates After the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. , 2019, Spine deformity.

[4]  D. Togawa,et al.  Minimum Clinically Important Differences in Oswestry Disability Index Domains and Their Impact on Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery , 2018, Asian spine journal.

[5]  S. Ohtori,et al.  Midlife changes of health-related quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent spinal fusion during adolescence , 2018, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[6]  Byung-Cheul Shin,et al.  Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in Pain, Functional, and Quality of Life Scales in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients , 2017, Spine.

[7]  J. Sanders,et al.  Selection of the Lowest Level for Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2015, Spine deformity.

[8]  Kazuhisa Takahashi,et al.  Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis 21 to 41 Years Later , 2012, Spine.

[9]  T. Mayer,et al.  Testing minimal clinically important difference: consensus or conundrum? , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[10]  P. Huddleston Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and Pain Scales , 2009 .

[11]  S. Berven,et al.  Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. , 2008, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[12]  Peter Croft,et al.  Interpreting Change Scores for Pain and Functional Status in Low Back Pain: Towards International Consensus Regarding Minimal Important Change , 2008, Spine.

[13]  H. Hashimoto,et al.  Validation of a Japanese Version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire Among Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients in Japan , 2007, Spine.

[14]  H. Hashimoto,et al.  Discriminative validity and responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index among Japanese outpatients with lumbar conditions , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[15]  A. Nachemson,et al.  Back Pain and Function 23 Years After Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Case-Control Study—Part II , 2003, Spine.

[16]  S. Fukuhara,et al.  Validation of the Japanese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[17]  D. Burton,et al.  The Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire for Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2003, Spine.

[18]  U. Liljenqvist,et al.  Quality of life and back pain: outcome 16.7 years after Harrington instrumentation. , 2002, Spine.

[19]  J. Fairbank Use of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) , 1995, Spine.

[20]  M. Roland,et al.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. , 1983, Spine.