Reducing Dimensionality of Multi-regime Data for Failure Prognostics

Over the last decade, the prognostics and health management literature has introduced many conceptual frameworks for remaining useful life predictions. However, estimating the future behavior of critical machinery systems is a challenging task due to the uncertainties and complexity involved in the multi-dimensional condition monitoring data. Even though many studies have reported promising methods in data processing and dimensionality reduction, the prognostics applications require integration of these methods with remaining useful life estimations. This paper describes a multiple linear regression process that reduces the number of data regimes under consideration by obtaining a set of principal degradation variables. The process also extracts health indicators and useful features. Finally, a state-space model based on frequency-domain data is used to estimate remaining useful life. The presented approach is assessed with a case study on turbofan engine degradation simulation dataset, and the prediction performance is validated by error-based prognostic metrics.

[1]  Bhaskar Saha,et al.  Prognostics Methods for Battery Health Monitoring Using a Bayesian Framework , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[2]  Jianbo Yu,et al.  A similarity-based prognostics approach for Remaining Useful Life estimation of engineered systems , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management.

[3]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[4]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery for Engineering Systems Health Management , 2011 .

[5]  K. Goebel,et al.  Prognostics in Battery Health Management , 2008, IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine.

[6]  Jay Lee,et al.  Prognostics and health management design for rotary machinery systems—Reviews, methodology and applications , 2014 .

[7]  Daming Lin,et al.  A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance , 2006 .

[8]  Kai Goebel,et al.  Uncertainty in Prognostics and Systems Health Management , 2020 .

[9]  M.G. Pecht,et al.  Prognostics and health management of electronics , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies.

[10]  C.S. Byington,et al.  A model-based approach to prognostics and health management for flight control actuators , 2004, 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8720).

[11]  Yongming Liu,et al.  Bayesian Analysis for Fatigue Damage Prognostics and Remaining Useful Life Prediction , 2016 .

[12]  Abhinav Saxena,et al.  Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management.

[13]  Jeffrey Alun Jones,et al.  NARX time series model for remaining useful life estimation of gas turbine engines , 2016 .

[14]  K. Goebel,et al.  Standardizing research methods for prognostics , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management.

[15]  Dogan A. Timucin,et al.  In-Flight Failure Decision and Prognostic for the Solid Rocket Buster , 2007 .

[16]  Emmanuel Ramasso,et al.  Investigating computational geometry for failure prognostics , 2014, International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management.

[17]  David A. Freedman,et al.  Statistical Models: Theory and Practice: References , 2005 .

[18]  S. Chatterjee,et al.  Influential Observations, High Leverage Points, and Outliers in Linear Regression , 1986 .