Visual and phonological pathways to the lexicon: Evidence from Chinese readers

In this study, we investigated the role of visual and phonological information in lexical access of Chinese characters. Homophonic English words have been the main source of stimuli for word recognition research. However, since these stimuli also often look alike, visual and phonological information may be confounded in reported experiments. In contrast, many homophonic Chinese characters are visually distinct. In addition, visually similar characters often have very different pronunciations. These characteristics allow a more controlled investigation of the roles of visual and phonological information in activation of meaning. In the present study, two types of Chinese characters were used in a semantic categorization paradigm: integrated characters, which contain strokes that are not separable; and compound characters, which contain at least two clearly identifiable components. The results show that the recognition of a Chinese integrated character depends primarily on visual information, whereas the recognition of a Chinese compound character relies on visual, phonological, and semantic information. It is concluded that visual information plays a greater role in Chinese character recognition than has previously been documented.

[1]  M. Coltheart Lexical access in simple reading tasks , 1978 .

[2]  H. H. Clark The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[3]  Paul W. B. Atkins,et al.  Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. , 1993 .

[4]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[5]  M T Turvey,et al.  Further evidence for phonological constraints on visual lexical access: TOWED primes FROG , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Mark S. Seidenberg The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems , 1985, Cognition.

[7]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a "universal" phonological principle. , 1992 .

[8]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[9]  Bruce F. Pennington,et al.  Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. , 1990, Psychological review.

[10]  Irving Biederman,et al.  On processing Chinese ideographs and English words: Some implications from Stroop-test results , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Reading and the Mental Lexicon , 1991 .

[12]  Brendan S. Weekes,et al.  Surface Dyslexia and Surface Dysgraphia: Treatment Studies and Their Theoretical Implications , 1996 .

[13]  C. Perfetti,et al.  VERY EARLY PHONOLOGICAL ACTIVATION IN CHINESE READING , 1995 .

[14]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Phonologically mediated access to meaning for Kanji: Is a rows still a rose in Japanese Kanji? , 1993 .

[15]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Phonological processes in reading Chinese characters. , 1991 .

[16]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  K. Paap,et al.  Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race , 1991 .

[18]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Automatic phonetic transfer in bidialectal reading , 1991, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[19]  G. C. Orden A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading , 1987 .