Ultra-precision optical surface fabricated by hydrodynamic effect polishing combined with magnetorheological finishing

Abstract In the traditional machining method, the surface quality will get worse during the surface figuring process while the surface figure will be destroyed after ultra-smooth polishing process. To obtain an ultra-precision optical surface, these two processes are conducted iteratively which is time-consuming and unstable. A new fabrication method combined with the magnetorheological finishing (MRF) and hydrodynamic effect polishing (HEP) technology was presented. The surface figure error can be quickly depressed by MRF due to its high deterministic figuring ability, while the surface quality will get worse due to the introduction of MRF polishing marks. The material removal of HEP depends on the chemical interaction between the nanoparticles and workpiece in elastic mode, and an ultrasmooth surface with sub-nanometer level can been easily achieved with the surface figure well maintained. The experiment results show that the MRF polishing marks are removed clearly and the surface figure is well maintained after HEP process. Combined with MRF, a quartz glass with initial figure accuracy of 0.415 λ RMS (λ = 632.8 nm), mid-spatial frequency and high spatial frequency roughness of 0.407 nm RMS and 0.525 nm RMS has been improved to figure accuracy of 0.05 λ RMS, mid-spatial frequency and high spatial frequency roughness of 0.268 nm RMS and 0.163 nm RMS. Power spectral density (PSD) analysis indicated that the surface spatial frequency error has all been greatly depressed. It demonstrates HEP is an effective ultra-smooth polishing method with good ability to maintain the initial surface figure.

[1]  Haobo Cheng,et al.  Multiplex path for magnetorheological jet polishing with vertical impinging. , 2014, Applied optics.

[2]  Shengyi Li,et al.  Ultrasmooth surface polishing based on the hydrodynamic effect. , 2013, Applied optics.

[3]  Shengyi Li,et al.  Efficient fabrication of ultrasmooth and defect-free quartz glass surface by hydrodynamic effect polishing combined with ion beam figuring. , 2014, Optics express.

[4]  J. Bennett,et al.  Float polishing of optical materials. , 1987, Applied optics.

[5]  Robert A. Jones,et al.  Rapid optical fabrication with computer-controlled optical surfacing , 1991 .

[6]  Yongwu Zhao,et al.  An Asperity Microcontact Model Incorporating the Transition From Elastic Deformation to Fully Plastic Flow , 2000 .

[7]  Arun K. Sikder,et al.  Chemical mechanical planarization for microelectronics applications , 2004 .

[8]  Xuhui Xie,et al.  Microscopic morphology evolution during ion beam smoothing of Zerodur® surfaces. , 2014, Optics express.

[9]  Markus Rupp,et al.  Fabrication and metrology of diffraction limited soft x-ray optics for the EUV microlithography , 2004, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[10]  Shengyi Li,et al.  Material removal mode affected by the particle size in fluid jet polishing. , 2013, Applied optics.

[11]  Xinmin Shen,et al.  Improvement of magnetorheological finishing surface quality by nanoparticle jet polishing , 2013 .

[12]  Martin Weiser,et al.  Ion beam figuring for lithography optics , 2009 .

[13]  Chaoliang Guan,et al.  Surface quality of silicon wafer improved by hydrodynamic effect polishing , 2014, Other Conferences.

[14]  Y. Mori,et al.  Processing efficiency of elastic emission machining for low‐thermal‐expansion material , 2008 .

[15]  Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.  EUV scattering and flare of 10X projection cameras , 1999, Advanced Lithography.

[16]  Xiaoqiang Peng,et al.  Restraint of tool path ripple based on surface error distribution and process parameters in deterministic finishing. , 2010, Optics express.

[17]  Hui Fang,et al.  Dwell function algorithm in fluid jet polishing. , 2006, Applied optics.