Random Choice and Learning

Context-dependent individual choice challenges the principle of utility maximization. I explain context dependence as the optimal response of an imperfectly informed agent to the ease of comparison of the options. I introduce a discrete choice model, the Bayesian probit, which allows the analyst to identify stable preferences from context-dependent choice data. My model accommodates observed behavioral phenomena—including the attraction and compromise effects—that lie beyond the scope of any random utility model. I use data from frog mating choices to illustrate how the model can outperform the random utility framework in goodness of fit and out-of-sample prediction.

[1]  T. A. Hurly,et al.  Irrational choices in hummingbird foraging behaviour , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Michael Woodford,et al.  An Optimizing Neuroeconomic Model of Discrete Choice , 2014 .

[3]  H. Halff Choice theories for differentially comparable alternatives , 1976 .

[4]  Tommaso Denti,et al.  Rationally inattentive preferences and hidden information costs , 2017 .

[5]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[6]  Erkut Y. Ozbay,et al.  Revealed Attention , 2009 .

[7]  C. Sims Implications of rational inattention , 2003 .

[8]  S. Shreve Stochastic calculus for finance , 2004 .

[9]  Donald E. Campbell,et al.  Realization of Choice Functions , 1978 .

[10]  Kfir Eliaz,et al.  Reason-Based Choice: A Bargaining Rationale for the Attraction and Compromise Effects , 2009 .

[11]  Joel Huber,et al.  Market Boundaries and Product Choice: Illustrating Attraction and Substitution Effects , 1983 .

[12]  Paola Manzini,et al.  Sequentially Rationalizable Choice , 2007 .

[13]  Neville Wylie,et al.  The Limits of Attraction , 2010 .

[14]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  Speed, Accuracy, and the Optimal Timing of Choices , 2018, American Economic Review.

[15]  M. Degroot Optimal Statistical Decisions , 1970 .

[16]  S. Shafir,et al.  Context-dependent violations of rational choice in honeybees (Apis mellifera) and gray jays (Perisoreus canadensis) , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  Stochastic Choice and Revealed Perturbed Utility , 2015 .

[18]  K. Train Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[19]  A. Tversky Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[20]  Ian Krajbich,et al.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  D. Wise,et al.  A CONDITIONAL PROBIT MODEL FOR QUALITATIVE CHOICE: DISCRETE DECISIONS RECOGNIZING INTERDEPENDENCE AND HETEROGENEOUS PREFERENCES' , 1978 .

[22]  N. Aplin,et al.  Search and Satisficing By A , 2010 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Context-dependent preferences , 1993 .

[24]  A. Tversky,et al.  Substitutability and similarity in binary choices , 1969 .

[25]  D. McFadden,et al.  URBAN TRAVEL DEMAND - A BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS , 1977 .

[26]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[27]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Salience and Consumer Choice , 2012, Journal of Political Economy.

[28]  Mark Voorneveld,et al.  Better May be Worse: Some Monotonicity Results and Paradoxes in Discrete Choice Under Uncertainty , 2006 .

[29]  J. Payne,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[30]  Efe A. Ok,et al.  Revealed (P)Reference Theory , 2015 .

[31]  Michael Woodford,et al.  Rational Inattention with Sequential Information Sampling∗ , 2016 .

[32]  Faruk Gul,et al.  Random Choice as Behavioral Optimization , 2014 .

[33]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[34]  S. Shreve Stochastic Calculus for Finance II: Continuous-Time Models , 2010 .

[35]  Emir Kamenica Contextual Inference in Markets: On the Informational Content of Product Lines , 2008 .

[36]  A. Tversky Choice by elimination , 1972 .

[37]  H. D. Block,et al.  Random Orderings and Stochastic Theories of Responses (1960) , 1959 .

[38]  I. Simonson Vices and Virtues of Misguided Replications: The Case of Asymmetric Dominance , 2014 .

[39]  Filip Matejka,et al.  Rational Inattention to Discrete Choices: A New Foundation for the Multinomial Logit Model , 2011 .

[40]  Jay Lu,et al.  Random Choice and Private Information , 2014 .

[41]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[42]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  Irrationality in mate choice revealed by túngara frogs , 2015, Science.

[43]  Andrew Caplin,et al.  Behavioral Implications of Rational Inattention with Shannon Entropy , 2013 .

[44]  M. Woodford Stochastic Choice: An Optimizing Neuroeconomic Model , 2014 .

[45]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[46]  Michael J Beran,et al.  Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) exhibit the decoy effect in a perceptual discrimination task , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[47]  Alireza Soltani,et al.  A Range-Normalization Model of Context-Dependent Choice: A New Model and Evidence , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[48]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[49]  André de Palma,et al.  E M ] 2 6 Se p 20 17 Discrete Choice and Rational Inattention : a General Equivalence Result ∗ , 2018 .

[50]  Andrew Caplin,et al.  Revealed Preference, Rational Inattention, and Costly Information Acquisition , 2014 .

[51]  Paola Manzini,et al.  Stochastic Choice and Consideration Sets , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[52]  L. Thurstone PSYCHOPHYSICAL ANALYSIS , 2008 .

[53]  E. Fehr,et al.  Neuroeconomic Foundations of Economic Choice—Recent Advances , 2011 .

[54]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[55]  Harold R. Parks,et al.  A Primer of Real Analytic Functions , 1992 .

[56]  A. Rivlin,et al.  Economic Choices , 2001 .

[57]  M. Lynn,et al.  More Evidence Challenging the Robustness and Usefulness of the Attraction Effect , 2014 .

[58]  David Rudd,et al.  A Problem in Probability. , 1974 .

[59]  L. Thurstone A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[60]  M. Beekman,et al.  Irrational decision-making in an amoeboid organism: transitivity and context-dependent preferences , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[61]  K. Shue Consistent Good News and Inconsistent Bad News , 2017 .

[62]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .