The Commodification of Emergence: Systems Biology, Synthetic Biology and Intellectual Property

In this article I address the interactions between biological knowledge and ideas about the kinds of entity that are suited to appropriation. I start by arguing that commodification and reductionism are closely linked, and that patenting suits entities that are discrete and isolable, such as those that are the focus of molecular biology. I then turn to the new field of systems biology, which recognizes that traditional reductionist approaches to biology are no longer adequate and attempts to provide a more integrative understanding of biological systems. In doing this, systems biology has to deal with emergent phenomena. But patenting does not suit the dynamic and interactive complexity that is the object of study in systems biology. If systems biology rejects reductionism where does that leave commodification? I examine attempts to commodify predictive computational models in systems biology. I then turn to systems biology's sister discipline, synthetic biology, which deals with emergence by reducing the complexity of biological systems. By factoring out messy contingencies, synthetic biology is, in theory, well suited to commodification. Drawing on both these examples I explore how ideas about appropriation, including open source, are influencing the nature and course of research in biology.

[1]  Teresa R. Behrens,et al.  Unintended consequences of cooperative research: impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome , 2001 .

[2]  Holger Breithaupt,et al.  The engineer's approach to biology , 2006, EMBO reports.

[3]  S. Schaffer.  Enlightenment Brought down to Earth , 2003 .

[4]  D. Endy.  Foundations for engineering biology , 2005, Nature.

[5]  David Lind,et al.  The social life of the tortilla: Food, cultural politics, and contested commodification , 2004 .

[6]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[7]  Durant Drake.  The Mind and its Place in Nature , 1926 .

[8]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Reflexing Complexity , 2005 .

[9]  J. Dupré.  O It Is Not Possible to Reduce Biological Explanations to Explanations in Chemistry and / or Physics , 2009 .

[10]  Tomas Hellström,et al.  Taming Unruly Science and Saving National Competitiveness: Discourses on Science by Sweden’s Strategic Research Bodies , 2005 .

[11]  Dan Ferber,et al.  Microbes Made to Order , 2004, Science.

[12]  Lenny Moss,et al.  What genes can't do , 2002 .

[13]  Jonathon E. Mote,et al.  The laws of the markets , 2000 .

[14]  K. Packer,et al.  Patenting Culture in Science: Reinventing the Scientific Wheel of Credibility , 1996 .

[15]  Christian L. Barrett,et al.  Systems biology as a foundation for genome-scale synthetic biology. , 2006, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[16]  Frank J. Bruggeman,et al.  Systems Biology: Philosophical Foundations , 2007 .

[17]  Roger Brent,et al.  A partnership between biology and engineering , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  James J Collins,et al.  Plug-and-play with RNA , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Friedrich Engels,et al.  The process of production of capital , 1954 .

[20]  Timothy Caulfield,et al.  Evidence and anecdotes: an analysis of human gene patenting controversies , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  J. R. Meer.  Analytics with engineered bacterial bioreporter strains and systems. , 2006 .

[22]  B. Balmer.  Managing Mapping in the Human Genome Project , 1996 .

[23]  Richard M. Stallman,et al.  ViewpointWhy "open source" misses the point of free software , 2009, CACM.

[24]  S. Jasanoff.  States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order , 2004 .

[25]  Anthony Wensley,et al.  Innovation and intellectual property rights in systems biology , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  L. Sharp.  The commodification of the body and its parts. , 2000, Annual review of anthropology.

[27]  George S Mack.  Can complexity be commercialized? , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  Charles Auffray,et al.  From functional genomics to systems biology: concepts and practices. , 2003, Comptes rendus biologies.

[29]  Douglas B. Kell,et al.  The methodologies of systems biology , 2007 .

[30]  M. Albornoz.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[31]  Francis Crick.  "The Influence of Physics on Molecular Biology" (Cherwell-Simon Lecture) , 1966 .

[32]  K. Mcafee.  Neoliberalism on the molecular scale. Economic and genetic reductionism in biotechnology battles , 2003 .

[33]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Universities and the global knowledge economy , 1997 .

[34]  J. Boyle,et al.  Synthetic Biology: Caught between Property Rights, the Public Domain, and the Commons , 2007, PLoS biology.

[35]  J. Dupré,et al.  From molecules to systems: the importance of looking both ways. , 2009, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[36]  A. Pottage.  The Socio-Legal Implications of the New Biotechnologies , 2007 .

[37]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  Do Economists Make Markets?: On the Performativity of Economics , 2007 .

[38]  Matthias Heinemann,et al.  Synthetic biology - putting engineering into biology , 2006, Bioinform..

[39]  B. Parry.  Entangled exchange: Reconceptualising the characterisation and practice of bodily commodification , 2008 .

[40]  N. Thomas.  A Model Patient , 1861, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[41]  The double helix 50 years on: models, metaphors, and reductionism , 2003, Journal of medical ethics.

[42]  E. Keller.  The century beyond the gene , 2005, Journal of Biosciences.

[43]  Philip Mirowski,et al.  Science Bought and Sold: Essays in the Economics of Science , 2002 .

[44]  Maureen A. O’Malley,et al.  Knowledge-making distinctions in synthetic biology. , 2008, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[45]  Philip Mirowski,et al.  The Commercialization of Science and the Response of STS , 2008 .

[46]  Science as a commodity: Threats to the open community of scholars , 1985 .

[47]  Arnold Thackray,et al.  Private science : biotechnology and the rise of the molecular sciences , 1998 .

[48]  Alain Pottage,et al.  Organisms and manufactures: on the history of plant inventions , 2007 .

[49]  D. Boersema.  Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science , 1985 .

[50]  M. V. Regenmortel,et al.  Reductionism and complexity in molecular biology , 2004, HIV/AIDS: Immunochemistry, Reductionism and Vaccine Design.

[51]  Frederick K. Balagaddé,et al.  Biology by design: reduction and synthesis of cellular components and behaviour , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[52]  Sui Huang,et al.  The practical problems of post-genomic biology , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[53]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A Triple Helix of University—Industry—Government Relations , 1998, Scientometrics.

[54]  A. Goodman,et al.  Genetic Nature/Culture: Anthropology and Science beyond the Two-Culture Divide , 2003 .

[55]  B. Palsson.  The challenges of in silico biology , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[56]  Jürgen Pleiss,et al.  The promise of synthetic biology , 2006, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[57]  Jane Calvert,et al.  Disciplinary baptisms: a comparison of the naming stories of genetics, molecular biology, genomics, and systems biology. , 2007, History and philosophy of the life sciences.

[58]  Helen Pearson,et al.  Genetics: What is a gene? , 2006, Nature.

[59]  M. Callon.  What Does It Mean to Say That Economics Is Performative? , 2006, Do Economists Make Markets?.

[60]  S. Franklin.  Kinship, genes, and cloning: life after Dolly. , 2003 .

[61]  In pursuit of systems , 2005, Nature.

[62]  Gary Rhoades,et al.  The Emergence of a Competitiveness Research and Development Policy Coalition and the Commercialization of Academic Science and Technology , 1996 .

[63]  G. Hodgson.  The Concept of Emergence in Social Sciences: Its History and Importance , 2000 .

[64]  Joachim Henkel,et al.  The economics of synthetic biology , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[65]  Bart Walhout,et al.  Constructing Life - Early social reflections on the emerging field of synthetic biology , 2006 .

[66]  S. C. Lakhotia,et al.  What is a gene? , 1997 .

[67]  K. Hoeyer.  Person, Patent and Property: A Critique of the Commodification Hypothesis , 2007 .

[68]  John Stone,et al.  Handbook of Science and Technology Studies , 2007 .

[69]  Merle Jacob.  Rethinking Science and Commodifying Knowledge , 2003 .

[70]  S. Gilbert,et al.  Embracing complexity: Organicism for the 21st century , 2000, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[71]  A. Rai,et al.  Synthetic Biology: The Intellectual Property Puzzle , 2007 .

[72]  E. Andrianantoandro,et al.  Synthetic biology: new engineering rules for an emerging discipline , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[73]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Relationships between academic institutions and industry in the life sciences--an industry survey. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.