Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy.

PURPOSE Tracking symptoms related to treatment toxicity is standard practice in routine care and during clinical trials. Currently, clinicians collect symptom information via complex and often inefficient mechanisms, but there is growing interest in collecting outcome information directly from patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events schema for seven common symptoms was adapted into a Web-based patient-reporting system, accessible from desktop computers in outpatient clinics and from home computers. Eighty patients with gynecologic malignancies beginning standard chemotherapy regimens were enrolled between April and September 2004. During an 8-week observation period, participants were encouraged to log in and report symptoms at each follow-up visit, or alternatively, to access the system from home. RESULTS All patients completed an initial log in. At each subsequent appointment, most enrollees (80% to 85%) reported symptoms using the online system, with a mean of three follow-up visits per patient during the observation period (range, one to six). Sixty of 80 patients (75%) logged in at least once from home. Use was significantly associated with prior Internet experience. Forty-two severe toxicities (grade 3 to 4) entered from home prompted seven clinician interventions. Most patients (96%) found the system useful and would recommend it to others. CONCLUSION Patients are capable of reporting symptoms experienced during chemotherapy using a Web-based interface. Assessment in the clinical trial setting and comparison of direct patient- versus clinician-based approaches for reporting symptoms and their severity are warranted.

[1]  M. Mori,et al.  How accurate is clinician reporting of chemotherapy adverse effects? A comparison with patient-reported symptoms from the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  Ramesh Farzanfar,et al.  Telephone-linked care for cancer symptom monitoring: a pilot study. , 2002, Cancer practice.

[3]  E. McFadden,et al.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group , 1982, American journal of clinical oncology.

[4]  David Cella,et al.  Measuring the side effects of taxane therapy in oncology , 2003, Cancer.

[5]  D. Fairclough,et al.  Patient reported outcomes as endpoints in medical research , 2004, Statistical methods in medical research.

[6]  C. Gwede,et al.  Assessment of toxicity in cooperative oncology clinical trials: the long and short of it. , 2002, The Journal of oncology management : the official journal of the American College of Oncology Administrators.

[7]  D. Gustafson,et al.  An Evidence-Based Approach to Interactive Health Communication: A Challenge to Medicine in the Information Age , 1998 .

[8]  I. Tannock,et al.  Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  D. Sargent,et al.  Rapid reporting and review of an increased incidence of a known adverse event. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  D. Cella,et al.  Early change in patient-reported health during lung cancer chemotherapy predicts clinical outcomes beyond those predicted by baseline report: results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study 5592. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  D. Cella The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung and Lung Cancer Subscale assess quality of life and meaningful symptom improvement in lung cancer. , 2004, Seminars in oncology.

[12]  A. Dowson,et al.  Applications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact , 2003, Quality of Life Research.

[13]  David Cella,et al.  The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System: properties, applications, and interpretation , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[14]  D. Forman,et al.  Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  N. Leidy,et al.  Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001. , 2003, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[16]  P. Selby,et al.  Self-reported quality of life of individual cancer patients: concordance of results with disease course and medical records. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  P. Whitten,et al.  Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  D. Cella,et al.  Patient, caregiver, and oncologist perceptions of cancer-related fatigue: results of a tripart assessment survey. The Fatigue Coalition. , 1997, Seminars in hematology.

[19]  S. P. Mitchell,et al.  Assessing a prostate cancer brachytherapy technique using early patient-reported symptoms: a potential early indicator for technology assessment? , 2004, Clinical Prostate Cancer.

[20]  Jakob B. Bjorner,et al.  The feasibility of applying item response theory to measures of migraine impact: A re-analysis of three clinical studies , 2003, Quality of Life Research.

[21]  I S Kohane,et al.  Using a pen-based computer to collect health-related quality of life and utilities information. , 1995, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[22]  Ingela Wiklund,et al.  Assessment of patient‐reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health‐related quality of life , 2004, Fundamental & clinical pharmacology.

[23]  R. Rabin,et al.  EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group , 2001, Annals of medicine.

[24]  D. Lubeck,et al.  Differences in urologist and patient assessments of health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: results of the CaPSURE database. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[25]  M. Litwin,et al.  Accuracy of recall in health-related quality-of-life assessment among men treated for prostate cancer. , 1999, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  D. Fairclough Design and analysis of quality of life studies in clinical trials , 2002, Quality of Life Research.

[27]  A Smith,et al.  Feasibility and compliance of automated measurement of quality of life in oncology practice. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  D. Tulsky,et al.  The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  D. Sargent,et al.  Early detection of toxicity and adjustment of ongoing clinical trials: the history and performance of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group's real-time toxicity monitoring program. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  Galina Velikova,et al.  Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  M. Barry,et al.  Patient-re ported complications and follow-up treatment after radical prostatectomy , 1993 .