Learning Corrected Target Forms: Students’ Corrective Feedback through Teacher’s Written Corrective Feedback in Iranian EFL Context

As a result of Truscott's (1996) claim that written corrective feedback (WCF) should be abandoned because it is both ineffective and harmful, different opinions about the value of WCF have been voiced. The aim of this article was to investigate (1) the possible effect of WCF on accurate use of quantifiers over a 2-month period; (2) the possible differential effectiveness for three types of feedback. Seventy EFL students at junior high school in Iran formed a control group and three experimental groups (1) those who received direct WCF with written metalinguistic explanation; (2) direct corrective feedback only; (3) indirect WCF. The subject in experimental groups accomplished a collaborative task (correcting five weak examinees' papers) in pairs. Then on three occasions (pre-test, immediate post-test and delayed post-test) the participants were asked to complete seventeen grammar items and write sentences about the given picture. The study found that each of the WCF groups significantly outperformed the control group on immediate post-test and this level of accuracy was retained 2 month later. Furthermore, no meaningful difference in effectiveness was found between the three WCF groups.

[1]  Harriet D. Semke.  Effects of the Red Pen , 1984 .

[2]  John Bitchener,et al.  The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing. , 2005 .

[3]  D. Ferris.  THE CASE FOR GRAMMAR CORRECTION IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: A RESPONSE TO TRUSCOTT (1996) , 1999 .

[4]  Ute Knoch,et al.  The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation. , 2010 .

[5]  Folkert Kuiken,et al.  Evidence on the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Error Correction in Second Language Writing , 2012 .

[6]  D. Ferris.  The Influence of Teacher Commentary on Student Revision , 1997 .

[7]  Dana Ferris,et al.  Feedback in Second Language Writing: Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction , 2006 .

[8]  Ute Knoch,et al.  Raising the Linguistic Accuracy Level of Advanced L2 Writers with Written Corrective Feedback. , 2010 .

[9]  Dana R. Ferris,et al.  ERROR FEEDBACK IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: HOW EXPLICIT DOES IT NEED TO BE? , 2001 .

[10]  Christine Goring. Kepner.  An Experiment in the Relationship of Types of Written Feedback to the Development of Second‐Language Writing Skills , 1991 .

[11]  John Truscott,et al.  Review Article The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes , 1996 .

[12]  Tim Ashwell,et al.  Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method? , 2000 .

[13]  R. Schmidt.  The role of consciousness in second language learning , 1990 .

[14]  Diana Frantzen.  The Effects of Grammar Supplementation on Written Accuracy in an Intermediate Spanish Content Course , 1995 .

[15]  Ute Knoch,et al.  The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students , 2008 .

[16]  Ute Knoch,et al.  The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback , 2009 .

[17]  John Truscott,et al.  The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately , 2007 .

[18]  Steven J. Ross,et al.  SALIENCE OF FEEDBACK ON ERROR AND ITS EFFECT ON EFL WRITING QUALITY , 1986 .

[19]  Jean Chandler,et al.  THE EFFICACY OF VARIOUS KINDS OF ERROR FEEDBACK FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE ACCURACY AND FLUENCY OF L2 STUDENT WRITING , 2003 .

[20]  Charlene Polio,et al.  “If I only had more time:” ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions , 1998 .

[21]  Icy Lee,et al.  ESL learners' performance in error correction in writing: Some implications for teaching , 1997 .

[22]  D. Ferris.  The ‘‘Grammar Correction’ ’ Debate in L2 Writing: , 2022 .

[23]  J. Lantolf.  SOCIOCULTURAL THEORY AND L2: State of the Art , 2006, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[24]  John F. Lalande.  Reducing Composition Errors: An Experiment , 1982 .

[25]  Vera Busse,et al.  Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing , 2013 .

[26]  John Bitchener,et al.  A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CF , 2012 .

[27]  Younghee Sheen.  The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners´ Acquisition of Articles. , 2007 .

[28]  John Bitchener,et al.  Evidence in Support of Written Corrective Feedback. , 2008 .

[29]  Folkert Kuiken,et al.  The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners written accuracy , 2008 .

[30]  Ken Sheppard.  Two Feedback Types: Do They Make A Difference? , 1992 .

[31]  John Truscott,et al.  Error correction, revision, and learning , 2008 .

[32]  Neomy Storch,et al.  Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes , 2007 .

[33]  J. Truscott,et al.  The Case for "The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes": A Response to Ferris , 1999 .