Comparison of Reaction Response Time between Hand and Foot Controlled Devices in Simulated Microsurgical Testing

Purpose. We hypothesized that reaction times (RTs) for a switch release are faster for hand-controlled than for foot-controlled switches for physiological and anatomical reasons (e.g., nerve conduction speed). The risk of accidental trauma could be reduced if the surgeon reacted quicker and therefore improve the surgical outcome. Method. We included 47 medical professionals at USC. Demographics and handedness were recorded. Under a microscope, a simple reaction time test was performed, testing all extremities multiple times in a random order. Additionally, a subjective questionnaire was administered. Results. The mean RTs for hands are 318.24 ms ± 51.13 and feet 328.69 ± 48.70. The comparison of hand versus foot showed significant shorter RTs for the hand (P = 0.025). Partially significant differences between and within the experience level groups could be demonstrated by level of education (LE) and microscopic surgeries/week (MSW) (P = 0.57–0.02). In the subjective questionnaire, 91.5% (n = 43/47) of test subjects prefer to use hand controls. Conclusion. Our data show that the RT for hands is faster than feet. Similarly the subjective questionnaire showed a greater preference for hand actuation. This data suggest a hand-controlled ophthalmic instrument might have distinct advantages; however, clinical correlation is required.

[1]  Charles D. Kelman,et al.  Phaco-Emulsification and Aspiration , 1967 .

[2]  D. Dinges,et al.  Psychomotor Vigilance Performance: Neurocognitive Assay Sensitive to Sleep Loss , 2004 .

[3]  Michael Trimmel,et al.  Impact of background noise on reaction time and brain DC potential changes of VDT-based spatial attention , 2006, Ergonomics.

[4]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Variability in reaction time performance of younger and older adults. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[5]  R Montés-Micó,et al.  Eye-hand and eye-foot visual reaction times of young soccer players. , 2000, Optometry.

[6]  T. Mulrooney,et al.  Sleep Deprivation: Clinical Issues, Pharmacology, and Sleep Loss Effects , 2005 .

[7]  L. Richards,et al.  Effects of age, step direction, and reaction condition on the ability to step quickly. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[8]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[9]  Richard A. Magill,et al.  Motor Learning. Concepts and Applications , 1998 .

[10]  M J Buekers,et al.  Gender differences in choice reaction time: evidence for differential strategies. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[11]  C D Kelman,et al.  Phaco-Emulsification and Aspiration , 1967 .

[12]  Donald E. Broadbent,et al.  Decision and stress , 1971 .

[13]  I. Deary,et al.  Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[14]  James K Richardson,et al.  Pilot evaluation of a novel clinical test of reaction time in national collegiate athletic association division I football players. , 2010, Journal of athletic training.

[15]  B. L. Baker,et al.  Age and Sex Parameters in Psychomotor Learning , 1964, Perceptual and motor skills.

[16]  E W Norton,et al.  Vitrectomy: a pars plana approach. , 1971, Transactions - American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology.