Developing and Managing Cross-Functional Teams: A Multi-Case Study of Brazilian Manufacturing Companies

The growth of industries and the strong economic base in Brazil require improvements and adaptations in business processes. Cross-functional teams (CFT) may help to companies achieve these improvements. This research looks at characterizing CFT according to application processes, structures, objectives and impacts, considering the context of demand planning and related processes. In-depth interviews with 22 managers were performed in three Brazilian manufacturing companies. A framework to characterize CFT and respective impacts is proposed, including elements such as: procedures, context and goals, power distribution, impacts on cross-functional integration, impacts on teams' performance and on organization's performance. One significant managerial finding is that effective and efficient CFTs need balanced distribution of power among members by effectively establishing and structuring the team. By doing this, managers may observe positive impacts on inter-functional integration and in firm's results. Moreover, teams should permanently perform joint planning to predict unfavorable situations, improve communication and mutual understanding.

[1]  Kenneth B. Kahn.  Interdepartmental Integration: A Definition with Implications for Product Development Performance , 1996 .

[2]  Nancy G. Boyd,et al.  Cross‐functional team effectiveness , 2013 .

[3]  John D'Ambra,et al.  Knowledge Sharing in Cross-Functional Teams: A Coopetitive Model , 2012, J. Knowl. Manag..

[4]  J. Hauser,et al.  Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature , 1996 .

[5]  Zhong-Zhong Jiang,et al.  A method for member selection of cross-functional teams using the individual and collaborative performances , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Martin W. Bauer,et al.  Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som: um manual prático , 2002 .

[7]  John W. Henke,et al.  Cross-Functional Teams: Good Concept, Poor Implementation! , 1993 .

[8]  Violina Ratcheva,et al.  Integrating diverse knowledge through boundary spanning processes – The case of multidisciplinary project teams , 2009 .

[9]  Bart van den Hooff,et al.  Are We on the Same Page? Knowledge Boundaries and Transactive Memory System Development in Cross-Functional Teams , 2015, Commun. Res..

[10]  Darja Topolšek,et al.  The Role of Employee Relations in the Level of Internal Integration between Logistics and Marketing Functions: the Case of Slovenian Retail Companies , 2012 .

[11]  Linda Whicker,et al.  Do logistics and marketing understand each other? An empirical investigation of the interface activities between logistics and marketing , 2008 .

[12]  Ajay K. Kohli,et al.  Reducing marketing’s conflict with other functions: The differential effects of integrating mechanisms , 2000 .

[13]  Roque Moraes,et al.  Analise de conteudo , 1999 .

[14]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Understanding the factors that enable and inhibit the integration of operations, purchasing and logistics , 2004 .

[15]  Rebecca A. Proehl.  Enhancing the effectiveness of cross‐functional teams , 2013 .

[16]  Sheila Simsarian Webber,et al.  Leadership and trust facilitating cross‐functional team success , 2002 .

[17]  J. Pinto,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation , 1993 .

[18]  Mei Li,et al.  Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications , 2011 .

[19]  Noel Watson,et al.  Alignment in Cross-Functional and Cross-Firm Supply Chain Planning , 2007 .

[20]  Mikko Ketokivi,et al.  Cross‐functional integration and performance: what are the real benefits? , 2012 .

[21]  E. McDonough.  Investigation of Factors Contributing to the Success of Cross-Functional Teams , 2000 .

[22]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos , 2005 .

[23]  Patricia J. Daugherty,et al.  MARKETING/LOGISTICS RELATIONSHIPS: INFLUENCE ON CAPABILITIES AND PERFORMANCE , 2009 .

[24]  Dag Ericsson,et al.  Demand chain management: a Swedish industrial case study , 2009, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[25]  Jorge F. S. Gomes,et al.  Critical success factors for cross‐functional teamwork in new product development , 2000 .

[26]  Sérgio Luis da Silva,et al.  Integration in New Product Development: Case Study in a Large Brazilian High-Technology Company , 2012 .

[27]  Terry L. Esper,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO LOGISTICS, MARKETING, PRODUCTION, AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT , 2008 .

[28]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Transcending Knowledge Differences in Cross-Functional Teams , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[29]  J. Alexander,et al.  Status Differences in Cross-Functional Teams: Effects on Individual Member Participation, Job Satisfaction, and Intent to Quit∗ , 2004, Journal of health and social behavior.

[30]  Alexander E. Ellinger,et al.  BRIDGING THE DIVIDE BETWEEN LOGISTICS AND MARKETING: FACILITATING COLLABORATIVE BEHAVIOR , 2006 .

[31]  Boo-Ho Rho,et al.  Improving interface congruence between manufacturing and marketing in industrial-product manufacturers , 1994 .

[32]  Sara A. McComb,et al.  Crossing functions above the cross-functional project team: The value of lateral coordination among functional department heads , 2014 .

[33]  Oscar Hauptman,et al.  Managing integration and coordination in cross‐functional teams: an international study of Concurrent Engineering product development , 1999 .

[34]  D. Flint,et al.  Exploring processes for customer value insights, supply chain learning and innovation: An international study , 2008 .

[35]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[36]  J. Katzenbach,et al.  The discipline of teams. , 1993, Harvard business review.