Asymmetric Reactions to Work Group Sex Diversity Among Men and Women

Attitudes among 178 professional men and women working for a clothing manufacturer and retailer depended on their work groups' sex composition. Findings were consistent with status considerations: ...

[1]  Joseph Berger,et al.  STATUS ORGANIZING PROCESSES , 1980 .

[2]  B. Mullen,et al.  Status, Expectations, and Behavior , 1990 .

[3]  J. Richard Hackman,et al.  The More, the Better? A Four-Nation Study of the Inclusion of Women in Symphony Orchestras , 1995 .

[4]  Linda L. Carli.  Gender, Interpersonal Power, and Social Influence , 1999 .

[5]  S. Stewman.  Organizational demography. , 1988, Annual review of sociology.

[6]  Sandra E. Spataro,et al.  Getting to Know You: The Influence of Personality on Impressions and Performance of Demographically Different People in Organizations , 2001 .

[7]  Lynn Smith-Lovin,et al.  THE GENDER SYSTEM AND INTERACTION , 1999 .

[8]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[9]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[10]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[11]  Describing men, describing women: Sex membership salience and numerical distinctiveness , 1996 .

[12]  C. M. Riordan,et al.  Demographic diversity and employee attitudes : An empirical examination of relational demography within work units , 1997 .

[13]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. , 1986 .

[14]  Sharon R. Bird,et al.  Social Context at Work: A Multilevel Analysis of Job Satisfaction , 2000 .

[15]  W. Crano,et al.  Inferred evaluation and the relation between attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction. , 1988 .

[16]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: A PROFILE COMPARISON APPROACH TO ASSESSING PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT , 1991 .

[17]  C. Steele.  A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[18]  Yvonne Hirdman.  The gender system , 1991 .

[19]  Mary L. Fennell,et al.  Gender, interaction, and leadership , 1996 .

[20]  E. M. Ott,et al.  Effects of the Male-Female Ratio at Work: Policewomen and Male Nurses , 1989 .

[21]  B. Reskin,et al.  High Hopes , 2000 .

[22]  E. Schein.  Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[23]  Robin J. Ely,et al.  The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. , 1994 .

[24]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. , 1991 .

[25]  B. Kay Snavely,et al.  A Test of the Social Isolation of Male Tokens , 1983 .

[26]  R. Kanter.  Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  Alison M. Konrad,et al.  The Effects of Gender Role Congruence and Statistical Discrimination on Managerial Advancement , 1997 .

[28]  M. D. Pugh,et al.  Neutralizing Sexism in Mixed-Sex Groups: Do Women Have to Be Better Than Men? , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Impact of Positive Interdependence and Academic Group Contingencies on Achievement , 1988 .

[30]  Eve Spangler,et al.  Token Women: An Empirical Test of Kanter's Hypothesis , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  Christina T. Fong,et al.  Dueling Experiences and Dual Ambivalences: Emotional and Motivational Ambivalence of Women in High Status Positions , 2002 .

[32]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender effects on social influence and emergent leadership. , 1999 .

[33]  M. Brewer.  In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[34]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[35]  H. Ibarra.  Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. , 1992 .

[36]  S. Harlan,et al.  Craftworkers and Clerks: The Effect of Male Co-Worker Hostility on Women's Satisfaction with Non-Traditional Jobs , 1982 .

[37]  S. Karau,et al.  Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: a meta-analysis. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Building organizational commitment: A multifirm study , 1990 .

[39]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: the hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Separating individual and group effects , 1985 .

[41]  Charles Stangor,et al.  Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. , 1992 .

[42]  James N. Baron,et al.  So happy together? The impact of gender segregation on men at work. , 1987 .

[43]  L. Karakowsky,et al.  The effects of proportional representation and gender orientation of the task on emergent leadership behavior in mixed-gender work groups. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[44]  Allan P. Jones,et al.  The Effects of Co-Worker Simiilarity on the Emergence of Affect in Work Teams , 1996 .

[45]  Y. Yinon,et al.  Masculine and feminine traits: Their relation to suitedness for and success in training for traditionally masculine and feminine army functions. , 1989 .

[46]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[47]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[49]  A. Tsui,et al.  Beyond Simple Demographic Effects: The Importance of Relational Demography in Superior-Subordinate Dyads , 1989 .

[50]  S. Jackson,et al.  Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. , 1991 .

[51]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  To Your Heart's Content: A Model of Affective Diversity in Top Management Teams , 2000 .

[52]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  The Influence of Demographic Heterogeneity on the Emergence and Consequences of Cooperative Norms in Work Teams , 2001 .

[53]  A. Feingold,et al.  Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[54]  Sandra E. Spataro.  Not All Differences are the Same: The Role of Informal Status in Predicting Reactions to Demographic Diversity in Organizations , 2002 .

[55]  E. Heikes.  WHEN MEN ARE THE MINORITY: The Case of Men in Nursing , 1991 .

[56]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[57]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Being Different Yet Feeling Similar: The Influence Of Demographic Composition And Organizational Culture On Work Processes And Outcomes , 1998 .