Clinical features and magnesium levels: Novel insights in 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 copy number variants.

BACKGROUND Investigating copy number variations (CNVs) such as microdeletions or microduplications can significantly contribute to discover the aetiology of neurodevelopmental disorders. 15q11.2 genomic region, including NIPA1 and NIPA2 genes, contains a recurrent but rare CNV, flanked by the break points BP1 and BP2. Both BP1-BP2 microdeletion and microduplication have been associated with intellectual disability (ID), neuropsychiatric/behavioural disturbances and mild clinical features, even if with incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity. The pathogenic role of this CNV is quite unclear though. Unknown variants in other DNA regions and parent-of-origin effect (POE) are some of the mechanisms that have been proposed as an explanation of the wide phenotypic variability. As NIPA1 and NIPA2 encode for proteins that mediate magnesium (Mg2+ ) metabolism, it has been suggested that urinary Mg2+ levels could potentially represent informative and affordable biomarkers for a rapid screening of 15q11.2 duplications or deletions. Furthermore, magnesium supplementation has been proposed as possible therapeutic strategy. METHODS Thirty one children with ID and/or other neurodevelopmental disorders carrying either a duplication or a deletion in 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 region have been recruited. When available, blood samples from parents have been analysed to identify the CNV origin. All participants underwent family and medical data collection, physical examination and neuropsychiatric assessment. Electroencephalogram (EEG) and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan were performed in 15 children. In addition, 11 families agreed to participate to the assessment of blood and urinary Mg2+ levels. RESULTS We observed a highly variable phenotypic spectrum of developmental issues encompassing ID in most subjects as well as a variety of behavioural disorders such as autism and attention-deficit disorder/attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Dysmorphic traits and malformations were detected only in a minority of the participants, and no clear association with growth anomalies was found. Abnormal brain MRI and/or EEG were reported respectively in 64% and 92% of the subjects. Inheritance assessment highlighted an excess of duplication of maternal origin, while cardiac alterations were detected only in children with 15q11.2 CNV inherited from the father. We found great variability in Mg2+ urinary values, without correlation with 15q11.2 copy numbers. However, the variance of urinary Mg2+ levels largely increases in individuals with 15q11.2 deletion/duplication. CONCLUSIONS This study provides further evidence that 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 CNV is associated with a broad spectrum of neurodevelopmental disorders and POE might be an explanation for clinical variability. However, some issues may question the real impact of 15q11.2 CNV on the phenotype in the carriers: DNA sequencing could be useful to exclude other pathogenic gene mutations. Our results do not support the possibility that urinary Mg2+ levels can be used as biomarkers to screen children with neurodevelopmental disorders for 15q11.2 duplication/deletion. However, there are evidences of correlations between 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 CNV and Mg2+ metabolism and future studies may pave the way to new therapeutic options.

[1]  N. Jørgensen,et al.  Diurnal variation of magnesium and the mineral metabolism in patients with chronic kidney disease , 2021, Bone reports.

[2]  Matthew W. Mosconi,et al.  Genomic, Clinical, and Behavioral Characterization of 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 Deletion (Burnside-Butler) Syndrome in Five Families , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[3]  M. Butler,et al.  The 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 Microdeletion (Burnside–Butler) Syndrome: In Silico Analyses of the Four Coding Genes Reveal Functional Associations with Neurodevelopmental Disorders , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[4]  Dan J Stein,et al.  Association of Copy Number Variation of the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 Region With Cortical and Subcortical Morphology and Cognition. , 2020, JAMA psychiatry.

[5]  K. Oka,et al.  Magnesium Is a Key Player in Neuronal Maturation and Neuropathology , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[6]  M. Butler Magnesium Supplement and the 15q11.2 BP1–BP2 Microdeletion (Burnside–Butler) Syndrome: A Potential Treatment? , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[7]  B. Dallapiccola,et al.  Parent-of-Origin Effects in 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 Microdeletion (Burnside-Butler) Syndrome , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[8]  Annelot M. Dekker,et al.  Association of NIPA1 repeat expansions with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in a large international cohort , 2019, Neurobiology of Aging.

[9]  B. Peterlin,et al.  Rare missense TUBGCP5 gene variant in a patient with primary microcephaly. , 2019, European journal of medical genetics.

[10]  Heather Cody Hazlett,et al.  Fragile X syndrome , 2017, Nature Reviews Disease Primers.

[11]  Ronald Cohn,et al.  RAC1 Missense Mutations in Developmental Disorders with Diverse Phenotypes. , 2017, American journal of human genetics.

[12]  Michael J. Owen,et al.  Cognitive Performance Among Carriers of Pathogenic Copy Number Variants: Analysis of 152,000 UK Biobank Subjects , 2017, Biological Psychiatry.

[13]  M. Butler,et al.  Clinical and genetic aspects of the 15q11.2 BP1–BP2 microdeletion disorder , 2017, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[14]  D. Milani,et al.  Fragile X syndrome: a review of clinical and molecular diagnoses , 2017, Italian Journal of Pediatrics.

[15]  I. Piras,et al.  Recurrent 15q11.2 BP1‐BP2 microdeletions and microduplications in the etiology of neurodevelopmental disorders , 2016, American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics.

[16]  A. Prasad,et al.  Chromosomal Microarray Analysis of Consecutive Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders Using an Ultra-High Resolution Chromosomal Microarray Optimized for Neurodevelopmental Disorders , 2016, International journal of molecular sciences.

[17]  N. de Leeuw,et al.  DNA Methylation Profiling of Uniparental Disomy Subjects Provides a Map of Parental Epigenetic Bias in the Human Genome. , 2016, American journal of human genetics.

[18]  B. Abrahams,et al.  Reduced CYFIP1 in Human Neural Progenitors Results in Dysregulation of Schizophrenia and Epilepsy Gene Networks , 2016, PloS one.

[19]  M. Butler,et al.  The 15q11.2 BP1–BP2 Microdeletion Syndrome: A Review , 2015, International journal of molecular sciences.

[20]  T. Netoff,et al.  Functional Study of NIPA2 Mutations Identified from the Patients with Childhood Absence Epilepsy , 2014, PloS one.

[21]  Adam J. Schwarz,et al.  CNVs conferring risk of autism or schizophrenia affect cognition in controls , 2013, Nature.

[22]  H. Peeters,et al.  Genetic counseling for susceptibility loci and neurodevelopmental disorders: The del15q11.2 as an example , 2013, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[23]  K. Valente,et al.  Angelman syndrome caused by deletion: A genotype–phenotype correlation determined by breakpoint , 2013, Epilepsy Research.

[24]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Microdeletion/microduplication of proximal 15q11.2 between BP1 and BP2: a susceptibility region for neurological dysfunction including developmental and language delay , 2011, Human Genetics.

[25]  J. Buizer-Voskamp,et al.  A co‐segregating microduplication of chromosome 15q11.2 pinpoints two risk genes for autism spectrum disorder , 2009, American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics.

[26]  G. Quamme,et al.  Functional characterization of NIPA2, a selective Mg2+ transporter. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[27]  Thomas W. Mühleisen,et al.  Large recurrent microdeletions associated with schizophrenia , 2008, Nature.

[28]  C. Shaw,et al.  Identification of novel deletions of 15q11q13 in Angelman syndrome by array-CGH: molecular characterization and genotype–phenotype correlations , 2007, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[29]  J. Zarcone,et al.  Maladaptive behaviors and risk factors among the genetic subtypes of Prader–Willi syndrome , 2005, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[30]  Jiandong Sun,et al.  Distinct novel mutations affecting the same base in the NIPA1 gene cause autosomal dominant hereditary spastic paraplegia in two Chinese families , 2005, Human mutation.

[31]  N. Setian,et al.  Impact of molecular mechanisms, including deletion size, on Prader–Willi syndrome phenotype: study of 75 patients , 2004, Clinical Genetics.

[32]  Z. Talebizadeh,et al.  Behavioral differences among subjects with Prader-Willi syndrome and type I or type II deletion and maternal disomy. , 2004, Pediatrics.

[33]  E. Eichler,et al.  BAC microarray analysis of 15q11–q13 rearrangements and the impact of segmental duplications , 2004, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[34]  J. Fink,et al.  NIPA1 gene mutations cause autosomal dominant hereditary spastic paraplegia (SPG6). , 2003, American journal of human genetics.