Trapline foraging by bumble bees: IV. Optimization of route geometry in the absence of competition

Foraging on resources that are fixed in space but that replenish over time, such as floral nectar and pollen, presents animals with the problem of selecting a foraging route. What can flower visitors such as bees do to optimize their foraging routes, that is, reduce return time or route distance? Some repeatedly visit a set of plants in a significantly predictable sequence (so-called "trapline foraging"), which may also enhance their foraging efficiency. A moderate level of optimization and repetition of foraging routes can be reached by following simple movement rules for choosing the distances and turning angles of successive flights, without the use of spatial memory. If pollinators can learn the locations of patches and choose among possible foraging routes or paths, however, even better performance may be achieved. We tested whether and how bumble bees can optimize and repeat their foraging routes in laboratory experiments with artificial flowers that secreted nectar at a constant rate. With increasing experience, foraging routes of bees became more repeatable and efficient than expected from a combination of simple movement rules between successive flowers. We suggest that trapline foraging is a more sophisticated pattern of spatial use than searching and is based on memory. On the other hand, certain spatial configurations of flowers hampered optimization by the bees; bees preferred to choose short distances over straight moves and showed little plasticity in this regard. Developing an efficient trapline, therefore, may require prior selection of a set of plants with an appropriate spatial configuration. Copyright 2007.

[1]  G. Pyke Optimal foraging in hummingbirds: Rule of movement between inflorescences , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Gwenn W. Gröndal,et al.  Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1993 .

[3]  F. Gill,et al.  Economics of Feeding Territoriality in the Golden-Winged Sunbird , 1975 .

[4]  L. R. Kipp The flight directionality of honeybees foraging on real and artificial inflorescences , 1987 .

[5]  J. Thomson,et al.  Efficient harvesting of renewing resources , 2005 .

[6]  Paul A. Garber,et al.  Foraging decisions during nectar feeding by Tamarin monkeys (Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis, Callitrichidae, primates) in Amazonian Peru , 1988 .

[7]  Behaviour studies of honeybees in gathering nectar and pollen. , 1950 .

[8]  J. Cresswell,et al.  Predicted pollen dispersal by honey-bees and three species of bumble-bees foraging on oil-seed rape : a comparison of three models , 1995 .

[9]  D. Janzen Euglossine Bees as Long-Distance Pollinators of Tropical Plants , 1971, Science.

[10]  Bumblebees may use a suboptimal arbitrary handedness to solve difficult foraging decisions , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  R. Menzel,et al.  Detection of coloured stimuli by honeybees: minimum visual angles and receptor specific contrasts , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  Leslie A. Real,et al.  Habitat structure and animal movement: the behaviour of bumble bees in uniform and random spatial resource distributions , 1997, Oecologia.

[13]  Bernd Heinrich,et al.  THE FORAGING SPECIALIZATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL BUMBLEBEES , 1976 .

[14]  S. Sakai,et al.  Findings on spatial foraging patterns of bumblebees (Bombus ignitus) from a bee-tracking experiment in a net cage , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  H. G. Baker,et al.  The importance of pollinator behavior in the reproductive biology of tropical trees , 1974 .

[16]  M. Zimmerman Optimal foraging, plant density and the marginal value theorem , 1981, Oecologia.

[17]  S. Handel CHAPTER 8 – Pollination Ecology, Plant Population Structure, and Gene Flow , 1983 .

[18]  M. Zimmerman,et al.  Pollinator Foraging, Experimental Nectar-robbing and Plant Fitness in Impatiens capensis , 1985 .

[19]  A. Manning,et al.  Some Aspects of the Foraging Behaviour of Bumble-Bees , 1956 .

[20]  J. Ackerman,et al.  Food-Foraging Behavior of Male Euglossini (Hymenoptera: Apidae): Vagabonds or Trapliners? , 1982 .

[21]  K. Waddington,et al.  Flight patterns of foraging bees relative to density of artificial flowers and distribution of nectar , 2004, Oecologia.

[22]  Michael Zimmerman,et al.  Optimal foraging: A case for random movement , 1979, Oecologia.

[23]  Thomas S. Collett,et al.  The learning of a sequence of visual patterns by the ant Cataglyphis cursor , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  T. O. Lemke,et al.  Foraging Ecology of the Long-Nosed Bat, Glossophaga Soricina, With Respect to Resource Availability , 1984 .

[25]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  The Distribution and Abundance of Resources Encountered by a Forager , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[26]  W. Maddison,et al.  Behavior of bumble bee pollinators of Aralia hispida Vent. (Araliaceae) , 1982, Oecologia.

[27]  L. Harder,et al.  Response of traplining bumble bees to competition experiments: shifts in feeding location and efficiency , 2004, Oecologia.

[28]  Spatial heterogeneity, pollinator behaviour and pollinator-mediated gene flow: bumblebee movements in variously aggregated rows of oil-seed rape , 1997 .

[29]  Paul Graham,et al.  Route learning by insects , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[30]  R. Dressler BIOLOGY OF THE ORCHID BEES (EUGLOSSINI) , 1982 .

[31]  G. Pyke Optimal foraging: movement patterns of bumblebees between inflorescences. , 1978, Theoretical population biology.

[32]  Neal M. Williams,et al.  Trapline foraging by bumble bees: III. Temporal patterns of visitation and foraging success at single plants , 1998 .

[33]  K. Waddington CHAPTER 9 – Foraging Behavior of Pollinators , 1983 .

[34]  D. J. Anderson,et al.  Optimal foraging and the traveling salesman , 1983 .

[35]  W. Morris Predicting the Consequence of Plant Spacing and Biased Movement for Pollen Dispersal by Honey Bees , 1993 .

[36]  C. L. Gass,et al.  Response of a traplining hummingbird to changes in nectar availability , 1999 .

[37]  Uzi Motro,et al.  Innate movement rules in foraging bees: flight distances are affected by recent rewards and are correlated with choice of flower type , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[38]  S. N. Fry,et al.  Sequence learning by honeybees , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[39]  D. Levin,et al.  THE DEPENDENCE OF BEE‐MEDIATED POLLEN AND GENE DISPERSAL UPON PLANT DENSITY , 1969, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[40]  C. R. Ribbands The Foraging Method of Individual Honey-Bees , 1949 .

[41]  James D. Thomson,et al.  Trapline foraging by bumblebees: I. Persistence of flight-path geometry , 1996 .

[42]  R. Gegear,et al.  Effects of parasitic mites and protozoa on the flower constancy and foraging rate of bumble bees , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[43]  D. Levin,et al.  POLLINATOR FLIGHT DIRECTIONALITY AND ITS EFFECT ON POLLEN FLOW , 1971, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  F. Gill,et al.  TRAPLINE FORAGING BY HERMIT HUMMINGBIRDS: COMPETITION FOR AN UNDEFENDED, RENEWABLE RESOURCE' , 1988 .

[45]  M. Zimmerman Optimal foraging: Random movement by pollen collecting bumblebees , 1982, Oecologia.

[46]  R. Greenberg Biometry , 1969, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[47]  H. Tiebout,et al.  Daytime Energy Management by Tropical Hummingbirds: Responses to Foraging Constraint , 1991 .

[48]  M. Waterman Mathematical Methods for DNA Sequences , 1989 .

[49]  L. Comba Patch use by bumblebees (Hymenoptera Apidae): temperature, wind, flower density and traplining , 1999 .

[50]  J. Cresswell A comparison of bumblebees’ movements in uniform and aggregated distributions of their forage plant , 2000 .

[51]  Audrey E. Cramer,et al.  Vervet monkeys as travelling salesmen , 1997, Nature.

[52]  Y. Linhart Ecological and Behavioral Determinants of Pollen Dispersal in Hummingbird- Pollinated Heliconia , 1973, The American Naturalist.

[53]  P. Schmid-Hempel The influence of reward sequence on flight directionality in bees , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  C R Gallistel,et al.  Computations on metric maps in mammals: getting oriented and choosing a multi-destination route. , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[55]  L. Real,et al.  The effect of nectar variance on bumblebee patterns of movement and potential gene dispersal , 1985 .

[56]  D. Paton,et al.  Peripheral Foraging by Territorial Rufous Hummingbirds: Defense by Exploitation , 1984 .

[57]  D. Stephens,et al.  The adaptive value of preference for immediacy: when shortsighted rules have farsighted consequences , 2001 .

[58]  S. Shettleworth Cognition, evolution, and behavior , 1998 .

[59]  Alexandre Linhares State-space search strategies gleaned from animal behavior: a traveling salesman experiment , 1998, Biological Cybernetics.

[60]  James D. Thomson,et al.  Trapline foraging by bumble bees: II. Definition and detection from sequence data , 1997 .