The Influence of Strain Rate Dependency on the Structure–Property Relations of Porcine Brain

This study examines the internal microstructure evolution of porcine brain during mechanical deformation. Strain rate dependency of porcine brain was investigated under quasi-static compression for strain rates of 0.00625, 0.025, and 0.10 s−1. Confocal microscopy was employed at 15, 30, and 40% strain to quantify microstructural changes, and image analysis was implemented to calculate the area fraction of neurons and glial cells. The nonlinear stress–strain behavior exhibited a viscoelastic response from the strain rate sensitivity observed, and image analysis revealed that the mean area fraction of neurons and glial cells increased according to the applied strain level and strain rate. The area fraction for the undamaged state was 7.85 ± 0.07%, but at 40% strain the values were 11.55 ± 0.35%, 13.30 ± 0.28%, and 19.50 ± 0.14% for respective strain rates of 0.00625, 0.025, and 0.10 s−1. The increased area fractions were a function of the applied strain rate and were attributed to the compaction of neural constituents and the stiffening tissue response. The microstructural variations in the tissue were linked to mechanical properties at progressive levels of compression in order to generate structure–property relationships useful for refining current FE material models.

[1]  K. Chinzei,et al.  Mechanical properties of brain tissue in tension. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  L. Shuck,et al.  Rheological Response of Human Brain Tissue in Shear , 1972 .

[3]  J. Crandall,et al.  Nonlinear viscoelastic effects in oscillatory shear deformation of brain tissue. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  Kurosh Darvish,et al.  On the importance of nonlinearity of brain tissue under large deformations. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[5]  Takeo Matsumoto,et al.  Mechanical Characterization of Brain Tissue in High-Rate Compression , 2007 .

[6]  K Miller,et al.  Mechanical properties of brain tissue in-vivo: experiment and computer simulation. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  J. Versace A Review of the Severity Index , 1971 .

[8]  J. Langlois,et al.  Traumatic brain injury in the United States; emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths , 2006 .

[9]  Rolf H Eppinger,et al.  On the Development of the SIMon Finite Element Head Model. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[10]  Klaus - Peter Glaeser RESULTS OF SIDE IMPACT TESTS WITH THE EUROSID --PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST STAPP CAR CRASH CONFERENCE, NOVEMBER 9-11, 1987, NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA , 1987 .

[11]  Lawrence E. Thibault,et al.  Mechanisms of impact head injury , 1994 .

[12]  W. Streit,et al.  Microglial Response to Brain Injury: A Brief Synopsis , 2000, Toxicologic pathology.

[13]  B. Donnelly,et al.  Shear properties of human brain tissue. , 1997, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[14]  J. van Dommelen,et al.  The influence of test conditions on characterization of the mechanical properties of brain tissue. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[15]  Svein Kleiven,et al.  Dynamic response of the brain with vasculature: a three-dimensional computational study. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  K Miller,et al.  Biomechanics of soft tissues. , 2000, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[17]  K. Chinzei,et al.  Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: experiment and theory. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  J. van Dommelen,et al.  The mechanical behaviour of brain tissue: large strain response and constitutive modelling. , 2006, Biorheology.

[19]  S. Margulies,et al.  Age-dependent material properties of the porcine cerebrum: effect on pediatric inertial head injury criteria. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  E. Finkelstein,et al.  Incidence and Economic Burden of Injuries in the United States , 2006 .

[21]  Mark F. Horstemeyer,et al.  Modeling stress state dependent damage evolution in a cast Al–Si–Mg aluminum alloy , 2000 .

[22]  L. Bilston,et al.  Unconfined compression of white matter. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Richard L. DeWeese,et al.  EVALUATION OF A HEAD INJURY CRITERIA COMPONENT TEST DEVICE , 2004 .

[24]  M. Prange,et al.  Regional, directional, and age-dependent properties of the brain undergoing large deformation. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[25]  B. Kelley,et al.  Traumatic axonal injury in the perisomatic domain triggers ultrarapid secondary axotomy and Wallerian degeneration , 2006, Experimental Neurology.

[26]  S. Margulies,et al.  A fiber-reinforced composite model of the viscoelastic behavior of the brainstem in shear. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  King H. Yang,et al.  A proposed injury threshold for mild traumatic brain injury. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[28]  R.J.H. Cloots,et al.  Biomechanics of Traumatic Brain Injury: Influences of the Morphologic Heterogeneities of the Cerebral Cortex , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  J. Langlois,et al.  The Epidemiology and Impact of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Brief Overview , 2006, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[30]  M. Wald,et al.  Traumatic brain injury in the United States; emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths, 2002-2006 , 2010 .

[31]  A. K. Hansen,et al.  The use of pigs in neuroscience: Modeling brain disorders , 2007, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[32]  G. Holzapfel,et al.  Brain tissue deforms similarly to filled elastomers and follows consolidation theory , 2006 .

[33]  Kristy B. Arbogast,et al.  REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE PORCINE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM , 1997 .

[34]  S. Wessely,et al.  Shell shock and mild traumatic brain injury: a historical review. , 2007, The American journal of psychiatry.

[35]  K B Arbogast,et al.  Material characterization of the brainstem from oscillatory shear tests. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  K A Dunn,et al.  Traumatic brain injury in the United States: A public health perspective. , 1999, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[37]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Design Principles for Problem-Driven Learning Laboratories in Biomedical Engineering Education , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  R. Schmidt The Structure of the Nervous System , 1978 .

[39]  E. Park,et al.  Traumatic brain injury: Can the consequences be stopped? , 2008, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[40]  P. Bovendeerd,et al.  The large shear strain dynamic behaviour of in-vitro porcine brain tissue and a silicone gel model material. , 2000, Stapp car crash journal.

[41]  F. Velardi,et al.  Anisotropic constitutive equations and experimental tensile behavior of brain tissue , 2006, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[42]  Werner Goldsmith,et al.  The state of head injury biomechanics: past, present, and future part 2: physical experimentation. , 2005, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[43]  Rémy Willinger,et al.  Finite element modelling of human head injuries caused by a fall , 2006, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[44]  John Nolte,et al.  The Human Brain An Introduction to Its Functional Anatomy , 2013 .