Effects of two training procedures in cross-language perception of tones

Abstract This study evaluated two perceptual training procedures that might be used to increase native English (NE) and native Chinese (NC) listeners’ ability to discriminate the mid- vs. low-tone contrast in Thai under two inter-stimulus-interval (ISI) conditions (500 and 1500 ms). Participants received training using either a two-alternative forced-choice identification (ID) procedure or a categorial same/different discrimination (SD) procedure. The results obtained indicated that (a) NC listeners outperformed NE listeners both before and after training under both ISI conditions; (b) before training, NC listeners’ discrimination was better under the longer ISI while NE listeners’ performance was comparable across the two ISIs, but no ISI difference was observed for either group of listeners after training; (c) both NE and NC listeners’ performances significantly improved after training, but the improvement was significantly greater among NE listeners under both ISI conditions, and (d), the amount of improvement was comparable across the two training procedures and across the two ISI conditions. These results suggest that both ID and SD training procedures were equally effective in improving NE and NC listeners’ discrimination of the mid- vs. low-tone contrast in Thai and that prior experience with a tone language may prove advantageous in learning another tone language.

[1]  Mark A. Sabol,et al.  Semantic Encoding of Isolated Words. , 1976 .

[2]  John S. Pruitt,et al.  Effects of category knowledge and syllable truncation during auditory training on Americans' discrimination of Hindi retroflex‐dental contrasts , 1990 .

[3]  M. Patkowski,et al.  Age and Accent in a Second Language: A Reply to James Emil Flege , 1990 .

[4]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  L. Polka.  Cross-language speech perception in adults: phonemic, phonetic, and acoustic contributions. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  D. Massaro,et al.  Perceptual development in early infancy : problems and issues , 1988 .

[7]  V. Mann,et al.  Lexical familiarity and English-language experience affect Japanese adults' perception of / / and /l/. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Jan-Olof Svantesson,et al.  Tone 4 and Tone 3 Discrimination in Modern Standard Chinese , 1986 .

[9]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Arthur S. Abramson,et al.  Southeast Asian linguistic studies in honour of Vichin Panupong , 1997 .

[11]  C. Best.  A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception , 1995 .

[12]  J. Flege,et al.  Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels , 1997 .

[13]  D. Jamieson,et al.  Training new, nonnative speech contrasts: a comparison of the prototype and perceptual fading techniques. , 1989, Canadian journal of psychology.

[14]  Jack Gandour,et al.  Tone perception in Far Eastern languages. , 1983 .

[15]  J E Flege,et al.  Chinese subjects' perception of the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast: performance before and after training. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Y. Tohkura,et al.  Speech, Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure , 1992 .

[17]  W. Strange.  Speech perception and linguistic experience : issues in cross-language research , 1995 .

[18]  J. Flege,et al.  Native-language phonotactic constraints affect how well Chinese subjects perceive the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast , 1989 .

[19]  J. Werker,et al.  Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  J. S. Johnson,et al.  Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  Ratree Wayland,et al.  Perceptual discrimination of Thai tones by naive and experienced learners of Thai , 2003, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[22]  Bernard Comrie,et al.  The World's Major Languages , 1987 .

[23]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Louisa M. Slowiaczek,et al.  Phonological priming reflects lexical competition , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  D. Jamieson,et al.  Training non-native speech contrasts in adults: Acquisition of the English /ð/-/θ/ contrast by francophones , 1986 .

[26]  L Polka,et al.  Characterizing the influence of native language experience on adult speech perception , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Transfer of training of a new linguistic contrast in voicing , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  X. Shen,et al.  A Perceptual Study of Mandarin Tones 2 and 3 , 1991 .

[30]  Corinne B. Moore,et al.  Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese tones. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  James Emil Flege,et al.  Two procedures for training a novel second language phonetic contrast , 1995, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[33]  W. Strange,et al.  Effects of discrimination training on the perception of /r-l/ by Japanese adults learning English , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  A. Jongman,et al.  Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Ratree Wayland,et al.  Training English and Chinese Listeners to Perceive Thai Tones: A Preliminary Report , 2004 .

[36]  Arthur S. Abramson,et al.  Static and Dynamic Acoustic Cues in Distinctive Tones , 1976, Language and speech.

[37]  T. Scovel,et al.  FOREIGN ACCENTS, LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, AND CEREBRAL DOMINANCE1 , 1969 .

[38]  J S Logan,et al.  Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  J. Werker,et al.  Developmental changes across childhood in the perception of non-native speech sounds. , 1983, Canadian journal of psychology.