Review of Systems Engineering (SE) Methods and Their Application to Wave Energy Technology Development

The design of effective and economically viable wave energy devices involves complex decision-making about the product based on conceptual design information, including stakeholder requirements, functions, components and technical parameters. The great diversity of concepts makes it extremely difficult to create fair comparisons of the relative merits of the many different designs. Conventional design approaches have proved insufficient to guarantee wave energy technologies meet their technical and economic goals. Systems engineering can provide a suitable framework to overcome the obstacles towards a successful wave energy technology. The main objective of this work is to review the well-established systems engineering approaches that have been successfully implemented in complex engineering problems and to what extent they have been applied to wave energy technology development. The paper first reviews how system information can be organised in different design domains to guide the synthesis and analysis activities and the definition of requirements and metrics, as well as the search for solutions and decision-making. Then, an exhaustive literature review on the application of systems engineering approaches to wave energy development is presented per design domain. Finally, a set of conclusions is drawn, along with some suggestions for improving the effectiveness of wave energy technology development.

[1]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices , 2007 .

[2]  Shad Dowlatshahi,et al.  Product design in a concurrent engineering environment : an optimization approach , 1992 .

[3]  Juan Gabriel,et al.  Multidisciplinary system design optimisation of oscillating water column power plants: a nonlinear stochastic approach , 2015 .

[4]  J. DOUGLAS HILL,et al.  Unified Program Planning , 1972, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[5]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[6]  Henry Jeffrey,et al.  Risk vs. Reward: A Methodology to Assess Investment in Marine Energy , 2016 .

[7]  Eric Bonjour,et al.  How to implement the abstract design paradigm: the case of requirements engineering , 2013 .

[8]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Perspective: The Stage‐Gate® Idea‐to‐Launch Process—Update, What's New, and NexGen Systems* , 2008 .

[9]  K. S. Lau,et al.  Application of Function Deployment Model in Decision Making for New Product Development , 2006, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[10]  Gerrit Muller,et al.  Critical Factors Influencing Viability of Wave Energy Converters in Off-Grid Luxury Resorts and Small Utilities , 2016 .

[11]  Encarnación Medina-López,et al.  On the reversed LCOE calculation: Design constraints for wave energy commercialization , 2017 .

[12]  Diana L. Bull,et al.  Stakeholder requirements for commercially successful wave energy converter farms , 2017 .

[13]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[14]  T. Kjellberg,et al.  The representation of manufacturing requirements in model-driven parts manufacturing , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[15]  Henry Jeffrey,et al.  Beyond LCOE: A study of ocean energy technology development and deployment attractiveness , 2017 .

[16]  J. R. Crookall,et al.  Design for Economic Manufacture , 1986 .

[17]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Engineering Systems Multiple‐Domain Matrix: An organizing framework for modeling large‐scale complex systems , 2012, Syst. Eng..

[18]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[19]  Mohammadreza Kamali,et al.  Delphi-based prioritization of economic criteria for development of wave and tidal energy technologies , 2019, Energy.