Risk assessment of mitigated domino scenarios in process facilities

The propagation of accidents among process units may lead to severe cascading events or domino effects with catastrophic consequences. Prevention, mitigation and management of domino scenarios is of utmost importance and may be achieved in industrial facilities through the adoption of multiple safety layers. The present study was aimed at developing an innovative methodology to address the quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of domino scenarios accounting for the presence and role of safety barriers. Based on the expected performance of safety barriers, a dedicated event tree analysis allowed the identification and the assessment of the frequencies of the different end-point events deriving from unmitigated and partially mitigated domino chains. Specific criteria were introduced in consequence analysis to consider the mitigation effects of end-point scenarios deriving from safety barriers. Individual and societal risk indexes were calculated accounting for safety barriers and the mitigated scenarios that may result from their actions. The application of the methodology to case-studies of industrial interest proved the importance of introducing a specific systematic and quantitative analysis of safety barrier performance when addressing escalation leading to domino effect.

[1]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Safety assessment in plant layout design using indexing approach: implementing inherent safety perspective. Part 1 - guideword applicability and method description. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[2]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Using graph theory to analyze the vulnerability of process plants in the context of cascading effects , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The quantitative assessment of domino effects caused by overpressure. Part I. Probit models. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[4]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Heat Radiation Effects , 2013 .

[5]  James D. Colton,et al.  Large-scale hydrogen deflagrations and detonations , 2007 .

[6]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Risk-based design of process plants with regard to domino effects and land use planning. , 2015, Journal of hazardous materials.

[7]  Joaquim Casal,et al.  Domino effect in chemical accidents: main features and accident sequences. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[8]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Threshold-Based Approach , 2013 .

[9]  Kjell Arne Malo,et al.  Properties of simulated gas explosions of interest to the structural design process , 1998 .

[10]  Joaquim Casal,et al.  Analysis of Past Accidents and Relevant Case-Histories , 2013 .

[11]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Domino effect frequency assessment: The role of safety barriers , 2016 .

[12]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  CFD modeling of LPG vessels under fire exposure conditions , 2014 .

[13]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Historical Background and State of the Art on Domino Effect Assessment , 2013 .

[14]  R C Reid,et al.  Possible Mechanism for Pressurized-Liquid Tank Explosions or BLEVE's , 1979, Science.

[15]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Experimental and analytical investigation of thermal coating effectiveness for 3m(3) LPG tanks engulfed by fire. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[16]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  CFD model simulation of LPG dispersion in urban areas , 2011 .

[17]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Safety assessment in plant layout design using indexing approach: implementing inherent safety perspective. Part 2-Domino Hazard Index and case study. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[18]  Tasneem Abbasi,et al.  A new method for assessing domino effect in chemical process industry. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[19]  S Contini,et al.  Through ARIPAR-GIS the quantified area risk analysis supports land-use planning activities. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.

[20]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Thresholds for domino effects and safety distances in the process industry: A review of approaches and regulations , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[21]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Quantitative assessment of domino scenarios by a GIS-based software tool , 2006 .

[22]  L. C. Shirvill Efficacy of water spray protection against propane and butane jet fires impinging on LPG storage tanks , 2004 .

[23]  Salim Ahmed,et al.  LNG pool fire simulation for domino effect analysis , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  Stanley S. Grossel Major Hazards and Their Management; by Geoff Wells; Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby, UK, 305 pages. , 1999 .

[25]  Openbaar Lichaam Rijnmond Risk analysis of six potentially hazardous industrial objects in the Rijnmond area, a pilot study : a report to the Rijnmond Public Authority , 1982 .

[26]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Domino Effect Analysis Using Bayesian Networks , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  A fuzzy set analysis to estimate loss intensity following blast wave interaction with process equipment , 2006 .

[28]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The assessment of the damage probability of storage tanks in domino events triggered by fire. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The development of an inherent safety approach to the prevention of domino accidents. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  I L Hirst,et al.  'Worst case' methodology for the initial assessment of societal risk from proposed major accident installations. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.

[31]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Modeling heat transfer and pressure build-up in LPG vessels exposed to fires , 2016 .

[32]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Quantitative assessment of domino and NaTech scenarios in complex industrial areas , 2014 .

[33]  Zhigang Liu,et al.  A review of water mist fire suppression systems: fundamental studies , 1999 .

[34]  Marco Derudi,et al.  Heavy gas dispersion in presence of large obstacles: selection of modeling tools , 2014 .

[35]  Rouzbeh Abbassi,et al.  Vulnerability analysis of process plants subject to domino effects , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[36]  Dennis C. Hendershot Inherently safer chemical process design , 1997 .

[37]  B. Droste,et al.  Full scale fire tests with unprotected and thermal insulated LPG storage tanks , 1988 .

[38]  Genserik Reniers,et al.  Managing Domino Effects in a Chemical Industrial Area , 2013 .

[39]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Quantitative assessment of safety barrier performance in the prevention of domino scenarios triggered by fire , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[40]  T. A Roberts Directed deluge system designs and determination of the effectiveness of the currently recommended minimum deluge rate for the protection of LPG tanks , 2004 .

[41]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Cost-effective allocation of safety measures in chemical plants w.r.t land-use planning , 2017 .

[42]  K. Moodie,et al.  Experiments and modelling:- an overview with particular reference to fire engulfment , 1988 .

[43]  Bogdan Z. Dlugogorski,et al.  A Closer Look At The Fire Extinguishing Properties Of Water Mist , 1994 .

[44]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Identification of fireproofing zones in Oil&Gas facilities by a risk-based procedure. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[45]  Wout Dullaert,et al.  DomPrevPlanning©: User-friendly software for planning domino effects prevention , 2007 .

[46]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Prevention of domino effect: from active and passive strategies to inherently safer design. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[47]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Mitigation of fire damage and escalation by fireproofing: A risk-based strategy , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[48]  Dennis C. Hendershot,et al.  Incorporation of inherent safety principles in process safety management , 2007 .

[49]  Gabriele Landucci,et al.  Accident scenarios triggered by lightning strike on atmospheric storage tanks , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[50]  Kenneth Sörensen,et al.  A decision model to allocate protective safety barriers and mitigate domino effects , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[51]  A. M. Birk,et al.  On the thermal rupture of 1.9 m3 propane pressure vessels with defects in their thermal protection system , 2006 .

[52]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Application of domino effect quantitative risk assessment to an extended industrial area , 2009 .

[53]  Frank P. Lees,et al.  Loss Prevention In The Process Industries , 1980 .

[54]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis. , 2005, Journal of hazardous materials.

[55]  Bahman Abdolhamidzadeh,et al.  The significance of domino effect in chemical accidents , 2014 .

[56]  Wout Dullaert,et al.  The use of current risk analysis tools evaluated towards preventing external domino accidents , 2005 .

[57]  A. M. Birk Scale effects with fire exposure of pressure-liquefied gas tanks , 1995 .

[58]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Assessment of domino effect: State of the art and research Needs , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[59]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Application of dynamic Bayesian network to risk analysis of domino effects in chemical infrastructures , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[60]  Gigliola Spadoni,et al.  The ARIPAR project: analysis of the major accident risks connected with industrial and transportation activities in the Ravenna area , 1995 .

[61]  P. Latha,et al.  Strategies for the quantification of thermally initiated cascade effects , 1992 .

[62]  Gigliola Spadoni,et al.  The New Version of ARIPAR and the Benefits Given in Assessing and Managing Major Risks in Industrialised Areas , 2003 .

[63]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The quantitative assessment of domino effect caused by overpressure. Part II. Case studies. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[64]  T. A Roberts Effectiveness of an enhanced deluge system to protect LPG tanks and sensitivity to blocked nozzles and delayed deluge initiation , 2004 .