Factors Associated With Persistence in Science and Engineering Majors: An Exploratory Study Using Classification Trees and Random Forests

Many students who start college intending to major in science or engineering do not graduate, or decide to switch to a non‐science major. We used the recently developed statistical method of random forests to obtain a new perspective of variables that are associated with persistence to a science or engineering degree. We describe classification trees and random forests and contrast the results from these methods with results from the more commonly used method of logistic regression. Among the variables available in Arizona State University data, high school and freshman year GPAs have highest importance for predicting persistence; other variables such as number of science and engineering courses taken freshman year are important for subgroups of the student population. The method used in this study could be employed in other settings to identify faculty practices, teaching methods, and other factors that are associated with high persistence to a degree.

[1]  A. Astin,et al.  Involvement the Cornerstone of Excellence , 1985 .

[2]  W. D. Ray Applied Linear Statistical Models (3rd Edition) , 1991 .

[3]  P. Rayman,et al.  Women Science Majors: What Makes a Difference in Persistence after Graduation? , 1995 .

[4]  Brian D. Ripley,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks , 1996 .

[5]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[6]  S. G. Brainard,et al.  A longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science , 1997, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change.

[7]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Characteristics of Freshman Engineering Students: Models for Determining Student Attrition in Engineering , 1997 .

[8]  Jerilee Grandy,et al.  Persistence in Science of High-Ability Minority Students: Results of a Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[9]  R. Oaxaca,et al.  Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. A Life Sequence Analysis. , 1998 .

[10]  N. Dorans CORRESPONDENCES BETWEEN ACT™ AND SAT® I SCORES , 1999 .

[11]  Daryl E. Chubin,et al.  A Retrospective on Undergraduate Engineering Success for Underrepresented Minority Students , 2003 .

[12]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[13]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[14]  Matthew W. Ohland,et al.  Identifying Factors Influencing Engineering Student Graduation: A Longitudinal and Cross‐Institutional Study , 2004 .

[15]  J. Burtner The Use of Discriminant Analysis to Investigate the Influence of Non‐Cognitive Factors on Engineering School Persistence , 2005 .

[16]  Mary Frank Fox,et al.  Book Review: Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes by Yu Xie and Kimberlee A. Shauman. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2003 , 2003 .

[17]  Jeffry L. White Persistence of interest in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: an analysis of persisting and non-persisting students , 2005 .

[18]  Kelsey E. Medeiros,et al.  Beyond Bias and Barriers : Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering , 2007 .

[19]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering , 2007 .

[20]  Susan Haag,et al.  Engineering undergraduate attrition and contributing factors , 2007 .

[21]  J. Collofello,et al.  Engineering undergraduate persistence and contributing factors , 2008, 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.

[22]  J H Maindonald,et al.  Draft of Changes and Additions in a Projected 3rd Edition of Data Analysis and Graphics Using R , 2009 .