Attitudes Toward Attributed Agency: Role of Perceived Control

Previous research suggests that the increased attribution of agency to robots may be linked to negative attitudes toward robots. If robots are truly expected to assume various roles in our social environment, it is necessary to further explore how increasing agency, for example through increasing levels of autonomy, affects attitudes toward them. This study investigates the role of perceived control as a moderator explaining attitudes toward attributed agency in a collaboration context. Austrian-based participants ( $$\hbox {N}=102$$ N = 102 ) watched a video of a robot collaborating with a person to assemble a mixer—the robot was presented as either agentic and capable of proactively collaborating with the human or non-agentic and only capable of following human commands. The results show that attributing high levels of agency to robots is associated with negative attitudes toward them when individuals perceive low control during the collaboration.

[1]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[2]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Who is in charge? Sense of control and robot anxiety in Human-Robot Interaction , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[3]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources , 2017, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  E. Langer.  The illusion of control. , 1975 .

[5]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Living with Robots: Investigating the Habituation Effect in Participants' Preferences During a Longitudinal Human-Robot Interaction Study , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[6]  Jerry M. Burger,et al.  Desire for Control: Personality, Social, and Clinical Perspectives , 1992 .

[7]  Tuuli Turja,et al.  Robot Acceptance at Work: A Multilevel Analysis Based on 27 EU Countries , 2019, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[8]  M. Huby,et al.  The construction and interpretation of vignettes in social research , 2012, Social Work and Social Sciences Review.

[9]  Agnieszka Wykowska,et al.  Robots Improve Judgments on Self-generated Actions: An Intentional Binding Study , 2019, ICSR.

[10]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human–robot interaction , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[11]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Does the Robot Have a Mind? Mind Perception and Attitudes Towards Robots Predict Use of an Eldercare Robot , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[12]  P. Haggard,et al.  Negative Emotional Outcomes Attenuate Sense of Agency over Voluntary Actions , 2013, Current Biology.

[13]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  How might people interact with agents , 1994, CACM.

[14]  Julie A. Shah,et al.  Decision-making authority, team efficiency and human worker satisfaction in mixed human–robot teams , 2015, Auton. Robots.

[15]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Perspectives on Agency Interacting with and through Personal Robots , 2012, Human-Computer Interaction: The Agency Perspective.

[16]  Jonathan P. How,et al.  Operator Object Function Guidance for a Real-Time Unmanned Vehicle Scheduling Algorithm , 2012, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun..

[17]  Kazuhiro Kosuge,et al.  Progress and prospects of the human–robot collaboration , 2017, Autonomous Robots.

[18]  Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten,et al.  Development and Validation of the Self-Efficacy in Human-Robot-Interaction Scale (SE-HRI) , 2018, ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction.

[19]  E. Skinner.  A guide to constructs of control. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  J. Brehm.  A theory of psychological reactance. , 1981 .

[21]  S. Kopp,et al.  Action Choice and Outcome Congruency Independently Affect Intentional Binding and Feeling of Control Judgments , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[22]  Elisabeth Pacherie,et al.  The Sense of Control and the Sense of Agency , 2007 .

[23]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Addressing User Experience and Societal Impact in a User Study with a Humanoid Robot , 2009 .

[24]  Setareh Zafari,et al.  Machine agency in socio-technical systems: A typology of autonomous artificial agents , 2018, 2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO).

[25]  Jessica Lindblom,et al.  Foundation for a classification of collaboration levels for human-robot cooperation in manufacturing , 2019, Production & Manufacturing Research.

[26]  J. Rotter.  Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[27]  Liliana Ardissono,et al.  Mixed-initiative Scheduling of Tasks in user Collaboration , 2012, WEBIST.

[28]  Jan Zwickel,et al.  I See What You Mean: How Attentional Selection Is Shaped by Ascribing Intentions to Others , 2012, PloS one.

[29]  Márta Gácsi,et al.  Should we love robots? - The most liked qualities of companion dogs and how they can be implemented in social robots , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  P. Flandorfer.  Population Ageing and Socially Assistive Robots for Elderly Persons: The Importance of Sociodemographic Factors for User Acceptance , 2012 .

[31]  D. Wegner,et al.  Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley , 2012, Cognition.

[32]  Davide De Tommaso,et al.  Reduced Sense of Agency in Human-Robot Interaction , 2018, ICSR.

[33]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  Influence of Embodiment and Substrate of Social Robots on Users’ Decision-Making and Attitude , 2018, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[34]  Markus Appel,et al.  On the eeriness of service robots with emotional capabilities , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[35]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[36]  Franz Kummert,et al.  How Socially Assistive Robots Supporting on Cognitive Tasks Perform , 2014 .

[37]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[38]  D. Wegner,et al.  Causes and consequences of mind perception , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[39]  D. Terry,et al.  The theory of planned behaviour: the effects of perceived behavioural control and self-efficacy. , 1995, The British journal of social psychology.

[40]  K. Vogeley,et al.  Toward a second-person neuroscience 1 , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[41]  Natália Araújo Pacheco,et al.  A Perceived-Control Based Model to Understanding the Effects of Co-Production on Satisfaction , 2013 .

[42]  Gerald Echterhoff,et al.  “Social Robotics” und Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion , 2006 .

[43]  S. Folkman.  [Personal control and stress and coping processes: a theoretical analysis]. , 1988, Kango kenkyu. The Japanese journal of nursing research.

[44]  D. Wegner,et al.  Dimensions of Mind Perception , 2007, Science.

[45]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  The Negative Attitudes Towards Robots Scale and reactions to robot behaviour in a live Human-Robot Interaction study , 2009 .

[46]  Ben Wagner,et al.  Liable, but Not in Control? Ensuring Meaningful Human Agency in Automated Decision-Making Systems , 2019, Policy & Internet.

[47]  C. Allen,et al.  Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong , 2008 .

[48]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[49]  Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al.  Effects of electronic performance monitoring on personal control, task satisfaction, and task performance , 1996 .

[50]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[51]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Enjoyment, intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[52]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Machine Agency as Perceived Autonomy: An Action Perspective , 2000, Organizational and Social Perspectives on IT.

[53]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  Effects of a Social Robot's Autonomy and Group Orientation on Human Decision-Making , 2013, Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[54]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[55]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  Cultural Differences in Perception and Attitude towards Robots , 2014 .

[56]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  Dynamic robot autonomy: investigating the effects of robot decision-making in a human-robot team task , 2009, ICMI-MLMI '09.

[57]  H. Cooper,et al.  The desirability of control , 1979 .

[58]  T. Kanda,et al.  A cross-cultural study on attitudes towards robots , 2005 .

[59]  G. Flett,et al.  Controllability, coping, efficacy, and distress , 2000 .

[60]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Retirement home staff and residents' preferences for healthcare robots , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[61]  Marco Ragni,et al.  The gap between human's attitude towards robots in general and human's expectation of an ideal everyday life robot , 2017, 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[62]  Maryam Alimardani,et al.  The Attitude of Elderly and Young Adults Towards a Humanoid Robot as a Facilitator for Social Interaction , 2019, ICSR.

[63]  J. Burger.  Desire for Control , 1992 .

[64]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..