Interspecies Insertion Polymorphism Analysis Reveals Recent Activity of Transposable Elements in Extant Coelacanths

Coelacanths are lobe-finned fish represented by two extant species, Latimeria chalumnae in South Africa and Comoros and L. menadoensis in Indonesia. Due to their intermediate phylogenetic position between ray-finned fish and tetrapods in the vertebrate lineage, they are of great interest from an evolutionary point of view. In addition, extant specimens look similar to 300 million-year-old fossils; because of their apparent slowly evolving morphology, coelacanths have been often described as « living fossils ». As an underlying cause of such a morphological stasis, several authors have proposed a slow evolution of the coelacanth genome. Accordingly, sequencing of the L. chalumnae genome has revealed a globally low substitution rate for protein-coding regions compared to other vertebrates. However, genome and gene evolution can also be influenced by transposable elements, which form a major and dynamic part of vertebrate genomes through their ability to move, duplicate and recombine. In this work, we have searched for evidence of transposition activity in coelacanth genomes through the comparative analysis of orthologous genomic regions from both Latimeria species. Comparison of 5.7 Mb (0.2%) of the L. chalumnae genome with orthologous Bacterial Artificial Chromosome clones from L. menadoensis allowed the identification of 27 species-specific transposable element insertions, with a strong relative contribution of CR1 non-LTR retrotransposons. Species-specific homologous recombination between the long terminal repeats of a new coelacanth endogenous retrovirus was also detected. Our analysis suggests that transposon activity is responsible for at least 0.6% of genome divergence between both Latimeria species. Taken together, this study demonstrates that coelacanth genomes are not evolutionary inert: they contain recently active transposable elements, which have significantly contributed to post-speciation genome divergence in Latimeria.

[1]  D. Chalopin,et al.  Transcriptional activity of transposable elements in coelacanth. , 2014, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[2]  A. Meyer,et al.  Evolutionary active transposable elements in the genome of the coelacanth. , 2014, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[3]  F. Di Palma,et al.  Analysis of the transcriptome of the Indonesian coelacanth Latimeria menadoensis , 2013, BMC Genomics.

[4]  Sonja J. Prohaska,et al.  Analysis of the African coelacanth genome sheds light on tetrapod evolution , 2013, Nature.

[5]  D. Casane,et al.  Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’ , 2013, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[6]  D. Mager,et al.  Transposable elements: an abundant and natural source of regulatory sequences for host genes. , 2012, Annual review of genetics.

[7]  Taro L. Saito,et al.  Extremely slow rate of evolution in the HOX cluster revealed by comparison between Tanzanian and Indonesian coelacanths. , 2012, Gene.

[8]  J. Jurka,et al.  Families of transposable elements, population structure and the origin of species , 2011, Biology Direct.

[9]  H. Fricke,et al.  The population biology of the living coelacanth studied over 21 years , 2011 .

[10]  T. Itoh,et al.  Coelacanth genomes reveal signatures for evolutionary transition from water to land , 2010, Genome research.

[11]  H. Kazazian,et al.  SVA retrotransposons: Evolution and genetic instability. , 2010, Seminars in cancer biology.

[12]  P. Holland,et al.  Parallel Retention of Pdx2 Genes in Cartilaginous Fish and Coelacanths , 2010, Molecular biology and evolution.

[13]  O. Gascuel,et al.  New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. , 2010, Systematic biology.

[14]  Sonja J. Prohaska,et al.  Complete HOX cluster characterization of the coelacanth provides further evidence for slow evolution of its genome , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Guillaume Bourque,et al.  Transposable elements in gene regulation and in the evolution of vertebrate genomes. , 2009, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[16]  Keith R. Oliver,et al.  Transposable elements: powerful facilitators of evolution , 2009, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[17]  C. Feschotte Transposable elements and the evolution of regulatory networks , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[18]  S. Brenner,et al.  Sequence and organization of coelacanth neurohypophysial hormone genes: Evolutionary history of the vertebrate neurohypophysial hormone gene locus , 2008, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[19]  J. Bennetzen,et al.  A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[20]  M. Lynch The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Ryan E. Mills,et al.  Which transposable elements are active in the human genome? , 2007, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[22]  Jerzy Jurka,et al.  Annotation, submission and screening of repetitive elements in Repbase: RepbaseSubmitter and Censor , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[23]  J. Volff Turning junk into gold: domestication of transposable elements and the creation of new genes in eukaryotes , 2006, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[24]  D. Haussler,et al.  A distal enhancer and an ultraconserved exon are derived from a novel retroposon , 2006, Nature.

[25]  Ryan E. Mills,et al.  Recently mobilized transposons in the human and chimpanzee genomes. , 2006, American journal of human genetics.

[26]  M. Coates,et al.  A newly recognized fossil coelacanth highlights the early morphological diversification of the clade , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  J. Jurka,et al.  Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements , 2005, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[28]  P. Capy,et al.  The First Steps of Transposable Elements Invasion , 2005, Genetics.

[29]  C. Amemiya,et al.  Coelacanth genome sequence reveals the evolutionary history of vertebrate genes. , 2004, Genome research.

[30]  H. Kazazian Mobile Elements: Drivers of Genome Evolution , 2004, Science.

[31]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[32]  M. Tristem,et al.  The Evolution, Distribution and Diversity of Endogenous Retroviruses , 2003, Virus Genes.

[33]  J. Jurka,et al.  The Esterase and PHD Domains in CR1-Like Non-LTR Retrotransposons , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[34]  Lukas Wagner,et al.  A Greedy Algorithm for Aligning DNA Sequences , 2000, J. Comput. Biol..

[35]  D. Hillis,et al.  Two living species of coelacanths? , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  M. Batzer,et al.  Alu repeats and human disease. , 1999, Molecular genetics and metabolism.

[37]  J. Burch,et al.  Chicken repeat 1 (CR1) elements, which define an ancient family of vertebrate non-LTR retrotransposons, contain two closely spaced open reading frames. , 1997, Gene.

[38]  S. Karlin,et al.  Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  J. Maisey Discovering Fossil Fishes , 1996 .

[40]  G. Reid,et al.  Living fossil: The story of the Coelacanth , 1993, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[41]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  The population dynamics of transposable elements , 1983 .

[43]  J. L. B. Smith A Living Fish of Mesozoic Type , 1939, Nature.

[44]  P. Ahlberg,et al.  Chapter 17 – Morphology, Characters, and the Interrelationships of Basal Sarcopterygians , 1996 .

[45]  J. L. B. Smith Old fourlegs : the story of the coelacanth , 1956 .