On the use of pressure distributions to model the hydrodynamics of air-cushion vehicles and surface-effect ships

This paper surveys the research conducted on the hydrodynamics of traveling pressure distributions in the period since the first air-cushion-supported marine vehicles appeared. Most of this work has been based on the approximations of potential-flow theory with linearized free-surface conditions, because the level of pressures in these craft is sufficiently low to make these assumptions valid. The specific topics considered include the influence of the planform shape as well as the nature of the pressure fall-off at the edges of the distribution. The effects of canal sides and bottom (as in a towing tank) can also be included. Additionally, arbitrary motion of the pressure (representing a maneuvering vehicle) and fluctuating pressure (modeling the motions in waves) can be studied by the methods detailed here. A number of experiments have also been conducted. These show that there are many instances where the theory can be used to predict the resistance and other important quantities with useful accuracy. I would like to express my appreciation to Mr. Allen Ford of the David Taylor Research Center, Bethesda, for suggesting the preparation of this paper and for his careful review of the manuscript. Mr. Ford has done much to encourage my SES research, including the arrangement of an extended stay at the center during 1977. Much of my research reported in this publication was supported by the Office of Naval Research, the Naval Sea Systems Command (Surface Effect Ships Program Office), and the Australian Research Grants Committee.

[1]  Allen H Magnuson The disturbance produced by an oscillatory pressure distribution in uniform translation on the surface of a liquid , 1977 .

[2]  Hiraku Tanaka,et al.  Evaluation on Resistance Characteristics of an Air Cushion Catamaran in Calm Water , 1979 .

[3]  A. G. Ford Captured air bubble (CAB) vehicle progress report (Captured air bubble (CAB) vehicle, comparing drag, air propeller and waterjet propulsion systems) , 1968 .

[4]  D. R. Lavis,et al.  Response of Air Cushion Vehicles to Random Seaways and the Inherent Distortion in Scale Models , 1974 .

[5]  J. B. van den Brug,et al.  An experimental study on the dynamic stability of a ground effect machine model in heave, pitch and roll1 , 1969 .

[6]  Edward A. Butler THE SURFACE EFFECT SHIP , 1985 .

[7]  R. N. Bhattacharya,et al.  Wave in deep water due to the arbitrary motion of a pressure-area along any curved path on the undisturbed free-surface , 1969 .

[8]  David D. Moran,et al.  Seakeeping Characteristics of a High Length-to-Beam Ratio Surface Effect Ship , 1977 .

[9]  M R Swift,et al.  Heave motion of air cushion vehicles , 1978 .

[10]  G. K. Olson,et al.  Dynamics of a multiple-skirt air cushion vehicle , 1969 .

[11]  P Kaplan,et al.  A SIMPLIFIED REPRESENTATION OF THE VERTICAL PLANE DYNAMICS OF SES CRAFT , 1974 .

[12]  Allen G. Ford CAPTURED AIR BUBBLE OVER‐WATER VEHICLE CONCEPT , 1964 .

[13]  F. Wilson,et al.  The surface effect catamaran - A sea capable small ship , 1981 .

[14]  Thomas Henry Havelock,et al.  Ship Resistance: The Wave-Making Properties of Certain Travelling Pressure Disturbances , 1914 .

[15]  J C Tatinclaux ON THE WAVE RESISTANCE OF SURFACE-EFFECT SHIPS , 1975 .

[16]  M. J. Barratt The wave drag of a Hovercraft , 1965 .

[17]  Lawrence J. Doctors HYDRODYNAMIC POWER RADIATED BY A HEAVING AND PITCHING AIR-CUSHION VEHICLE , 1978 .

[18]  Lawrence J. Doctors The experimental wave resistance of an accelerating two-dimensional pressure distribution , 1975 .

[19]  Lim Chee-Seng,et al.  Water waves generated by an oscillatory surface pressure travelling at critical speed , 1981 .

[20]  Richard S. Schechter,et al.  The high frequency waves produced on the surface of a liquid by an oscillating translating pressure distribution , 1978 .

[21]  David R. Lavis AIR CUSHION CRAFT , 1985 .

[22]  V. K. Djachenko,et al.  THE WAVE RESISTANCE OF A SURFACE PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION IN UNSTEADY MOTION , 1970 .

[23]  L J Doctors THE EFFECT OF AIR COMPRESSIBILITY ON THE NONLINEAR MOTION OF AN AIR CUSHION VEHICLE OVER THE WAVES , 1976 .

[24]  A. J. Reynolds,et al.  Heaving and Pitching Response of a Hovercraft Moving over Regular Waves , 1972 .

[25]  David R. Lavis,et al.  SURFACE EFFECT SHIP (SES) DEVELOPMENTS WORLDWIDE , 1991 .

[26]  Norman K. Walker Influence of fan and ducting characteristics on the stability of ground effect machines , 1965 .

[27]  Lawrence J. Doctors Nonlinear Motion of an Air-Cushion Vehicle over Waves , 1975 .

[28]  Lawrence J. Doctors,et al.  THE ACCELERATION OF AN AIR CUSHION VEHICLE UNDER THE ACTION OF A PROPULSOR , 1973 .

[29]  N Salvesen,et al.  NONLINEAR FREE-SURFACE EFFECTS--THE DEPENDENCE ON FROUDE NUMBER , 1977 .

[30]  R. Wares,et al.  High Length-to-Beam Ratio Surface Effect Ship , 1978 .

[31]  R T Van Eseltine,et al.  Waves and Wave Resistance for Air-Cushion Vehicles with Time-Dependent Cushion Pressures , 1978 .

[32]  N. Hogben An Investigation of Hovercraft Wavemaking , 1966, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[33]  Robert A. Wilson,et al.  Powering Prediction for Surface Effect Ships Based on Model Results , 1979 .

[34]  David I. G. Jones Hovering Performance of Plenum Chamber GEMS over Land and Water , 1966 .

[35]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  Comparison of nonlinear wave-resistance theories for a two-dimensional pressure distribution , 1980, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[36]  J. N. Newman,et al.  THE PRESSURE ON THE SEA BOTTOM DUE TO A MOVING PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION , 1967 .

[37]  F. Wilson,et al.  Operational characteristics comparison /ACV and , 1981 .

[38]  A. K. Pramanik The effect of viscosity on the waves due to a moving oscillatory surface pressure , 1972 .

[39]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Nonlinear solution for an applied overpressure on a moving stream , 1981 .

[40]  J. D. Lin DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF GROUND EFFECT MACHINES IN MOTION OVER WAVES , 1962 .

[41]  W. A. Mair The Physical Principles of Hovercraft , 1964, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.