Combined Use of Conceptual Models in Practice: An Exploratory Study
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Yin. Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .
[2] Jan C. Recker,et al. A Socio-Pragmatic Constructionist Framework for Understanding Quality in Process Modelling , 2007 .
[3] Ron Weber,et al. On the deep structure of information systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..
[4] Izak Benbasat,et al. The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..
[5] Peter Fettke,et al. How Conceptual Modeling Is Used , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[6] Daniel L. Moody,et al. Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..
[7] Marta Indulska,et al. How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? , 2006, Data Knowl. Eng..
[8] Jan Recker,et al. Exploring cognitive style and task-specific preferences for process representations , 2016, Requirements Engineering.
[9] Ron Weber,et al. On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars , 1993, Inf. Syst. J..
[10] C. Urquhart. Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide , 2012 .
[11] Ron Weber,et al. Guidelines for Empirical Evaluations of Conceptual Modeling Grammars , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[12] Jinwoo Kim,et al. How Do We Understand a System with (So) Many Diagrams? Cognitive Integration Processes in Diagrammatic Reasoning , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..
[13] Keng Siau,et al. Theoretical vs. Practical Complexity: The Case of UML , 2005, J. Database Manag..
[14] Venkataraman Ramesh,et al. Understanding Conceptual Schemas: Exploring the Role of Application and IS Domain Knowledge , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..
[15] Ron Weber,et al. Should Optional Properties Be Used in Conceptual Modelling? A Theory and Three Empirical Tests , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..
[16] Michael Rosemann,et al. Developing a meta model for the Bunge-Wand-Weber ontological constructs , 2002, Inf. Syst..
[17] Graeme G. Shanks,et al. Representing part-whole relations in conceptual modeling: an empirical evaluation , 2008 .
[18] Rajiv Kishore,et al. Semantics of the MibML Conceptual Modeling Grammar: An Ontological Analysis Using the Bunge-Wang-Weber Framework , 2007, J. Database Manag..
[19] Peter Loos,et al. Ontological Analysis of Reference Models , 2005 .
[20] Jeffrey Parsons. An Experimental Study of the Effects of Representing Property Precedence on the Comprehension of Conceptual Schemas , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[21] Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al. Ontological Evaluation of the UML Using the Bunge–Wand–Weber Model , 2002, Software and Systems Modeling.
[22] Graeme G. Shanks,et al. Guidelines for Conducting Positivist Case Study Research in Information Systems , 2002, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..
[23] Ron Weber,et al. An Ontological Evaluation of Systems Analysis and Design Methods , 1989, ISCO.
[24] Jan Recker,et al. "Modeling with tools is easier, believe me" - The effects of tool functionality on modeling grammar usage beliefs , 2012, Inf. Syst..
[25] Cathy Urquhart,et al. Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..
[26] Michael Rosemann,et al. Potential pitfalls of process modeling: part A , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..
[27] Venkataraman Ramesh,et al. Human Factors Research on Data Modeling: A Review of Prior Research, An Extended Framework and Future Research Directions , 2002, J. Database Manag..
[28] Yanchun Zhang,et al. An analytical evaluation of NIAM'S grammar for conceptual schema diagrams , 1996, Inf. Syst. J..
[29] Trevor Wood-Harper,et al. Multiview - An Exploration in Information Systems Development , 1986, Aust. Comput. J..
[30] Michael D. Myers,et al. The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft , 2007, Inf. Organ..
[31] Jan Recker,et al. How Much Language Is Enough? Theoretical and Practical Use of the Business Process Modeling Notation , 2008, CAiSE.
[32] Laura Johnson,et al. How Many Interviews Are Enough? , 2006 .
[33] Marta Indulska,et al. Complementary Use of Modeling Grammars , 2011, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..
[34] Geert Poels,et al. Evaluating quality of conceptual modelling scripts based on user perceptions , 2007, Data Knowl. Eng..
[35] K. Eisenhardt. Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.
[36] IV RobertG.Pettit,et al. Lessons Learned Applying UML in the Design of Mission Critical Software , 2004, UML Satellite Activities.
[37] Ivar Jacobson,et al. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide , 1998, J. Database Manag..
[38] Jan Recker,et al. Continued use of process modeling grammars: the impact of individual difference factors , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[39] Irit Hadar,et al. Variations in Conceptual Modeling: Classification and Ontological Analysis , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[40] J. Grimshaw,et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies , 2010, Psychology & health.
[41] Marta Indulska,et al. Do Ontological Deficiencies in Modeling Grammars Matter? , 2011, MIS Q..
[42] Ron Weber,et al. Mario Bunge's ontology as a formal foundation for information systems concepts , 1990 .
[43] Richard V. McCarthy,et al. Does UML make the grade? Insights from the software development community , 2005, Inf. Softw. Technol..
[44] Peter Green,et al. An ontological analysis of information systems analysis and design (ISAD) grammars in upper case tools , 1996 .
[45] Fay Cobb Payton,et al. A Re-Examination of Racioethnic Imbalance of IS Doctorates: Changing the Face of the IS Classroom , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[46] Iv Robert G. Pettit. Increasing Confidence in Concurrent Software through Architectural Analysis , 2008, Ada-Europe 2008.
[47] Keng Siau,et al. Are use case and class diagrams complementary in requirements analysis? An experimental study on use case and class diagrams in UML , 2004, Requirements Engineering.
[48] Marta Indulska,et al. The ontological deficiencies of process modeling in practice , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[49] Andrew Gemino,et al. Evaluating modeling techniques based on models of learning , 2003, CACM.
[50] Peter Meso,et al. Conceptualizing Systems for Understanding: An Empirical Test of Decomposition Principles in Object-Oriented Analysis , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..
[51] Patrick Delfmann,et al. Supporting Distributed Conceptual Modelling through Naming Conventions - A Tool-based Linguistic Approach , 2009, Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Archit. Int. J. Concept. Model..
[52] Marta Indulska,et al. Business Process Modeling- A Comparative Analysis , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[53] Arash Saghafi,et al. Do Ontological Guidelines Improve Understandability of Conceptual Models? A Meta-analysis of Empirical Work , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[54] Jan Recker,et al. Explaining usage of process modeling grammars: Comparing three theoretical models in the study of two grammars , 2010, Inf. Manag..
[55] Graeme G. Shanks,et al. Conceptual Data Modelling: an empirical study of expert and novice data modellers , 1997, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..
[56] Vijay Khatri,et al. Customizing the Representation Capabilities of Process Models: Understanding the Effects of Perceived Modeling Impediments , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.
[57] Christoph Merschbrock,et al. A Research Review on Building Information Modeling in Construction - An Area Ripe for IS Research , 2012, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[58] Ron Weber,et al. Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling - A Research Agenda , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..
[59] Gretchen Irwin,et al. An Ontological Analysis of Use Case Modeling Grammar , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[60] Marta Indulska,et al. Using ontology for the representational analysis of process modelling techniques , 2009, Int. J. Bus. Process. Integr. Manag..
[61] Graeme G. Shanks,et al. User viewpoint modelling: understanding and representing user viewpoints during requirements definition , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..
[62] Michael Rosemann,et al. An Ontological Analysis of Integrated Process Modelling , 1999, CAiSE.
[63] Andrew Gemino,et al. Use Case Diagrams in Support of Use Case Modeling: Deriving Understanding from the Picture , 2009, J. Database Manag..
[64] Andrew Gemino,et al. Complexity and clarity in conceptual modeling: Comparison of mandatory and optional properties , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..
[65] Ron Weber,et al. Building Conceptual Modeling on the Foundation of Ontology , 2014 .
[66] Marta Indulska,et al. A Reference Methodology for Conducting Ontological Analyses , 2004, ER.
[67] Michael F. Goodchild,et al. Twenty years of progress: GIScience in 2010 , 2010, J. Spatial Inf. Sci..
[68] Dinesh Batra,et al. Conceptual Data Modelling in Database Design: Similarities and Differences between Expert and Novice Designers , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..
[69] Jeffrey Parsons,et al. Dimensions of UML Diagram Use: A Survey of Practitioners , 2008, J. Database Manag..
[70] Marta Indulska,et al. Candidate interoperability standards: An ontological overlap analysis , 2007, Data Knowl. Eng..
[71] Jan Recker. Understanding Quality in Process Modelling: Towards a Holistic Perspective , 2007, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..
[72] Yair Wand,et al. Research Note - How Semantics and Pragmatics Interact in Understanding Conceptual Models , 2014, Inf. Syst. Res..
[73] Ron Weber,et al. Are Attributes Entities? A Study of Database Designers' Memory Structures , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..