Study of the Current Distribution, Magnetic Field, and Inductance Gradient of Rectangular and Circular Railguns

Two different geometries of the rail in an electromagnetic launcher are rectangular and circular. In this paper, rectangular and circular railguns are simulated and compared using the finite-element method. Rectangular and circular railguns are formed by two parallel copper rails. The surface area of the railgun bore is 9 cm<sup>2</sup> and the surface area of the rail cross-section is 6 and 18 cm<sup>2</sup>. Current distribution (<i>J</i>), magnetic field intensity (<i>H</i>), and inductance gradient (<i>L</i><sup>'</sup>) are computed for the two aforementioned bore geometries, and the results are compared together. In the circular railgun, <i>L</i><sup>'</sup> is a function of the opening angle of the rails (θ), inner radius (<i>R</i><sub>i</sub>), and outer radius (<i>R</i><sub>o</sub>). Different values for θ, <i>R</i><sub>i</sub>, and <i>R</i><sub>o</sub>, in practical range, are used to compute <i>L</i><sup>'</sup>. By analyzing the numerical and theoretical results, it can be shown that the magnetic flux density in the middle of the circular railgun is a descending function according to the central angle. Finally, strengths and weaknesses of the rectangular railgun in comparison with the circular railgun are discussed.

[1]  R. A. Marshall,et al.  Railgun bore geometry, round or square? , 1999 .

[2]  Kuo-Ta Hsieh Numerical study on groove formation of rails for various materials , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[3]  A. Keshtkar,et al.  Effect of rail dimension on current distribution and inductance gradient , 2004, 2004 12th Symposium on Electromagnetic Launch Technology.

[4]  Determination of Optimum Rails Dimensions in Railgun by Lagrange's Equations , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[5]  P. Lehmann,et al.  Experiments with brush projectiles in a parallel augmented railgun , 2004, 2004 12th Symposium on Electromagnetic Launch Technology.

[6]  Kuo-Ta Hsieh,et al.  Hybrid FE/BE Implementation on Electromechanical Systems With Moving Conductors , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[7]  A. Keshtkar,et al.  Transition Study of Current Distribution and Maximum Current Density in Railgun by 3-D FEM–IEM , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[8]  M. Huerta,et al.  Conformal mapping calculation of railgun skin inductance , 1991 .

[9]  A. Keshtkar,et al.  Effect of Rail's Material on Railgun Inductance Gradient and Losses , 2008, 2008 14th Symposium on Electromagnetic Launch Technology.

[10]  Kuo-Ta Hsieh,et al.  A Lagrangian formulation for mechanically, thermally coupled electromagnetic diffusive processes with moving conductors , 1995 .

[11]  M. Ghassemi,et al.  Analysis of Force Distribution Acting Upon the Rails and the Armature and Prediction of Velocity With Time in an Electromagnetic Launcher With New Method , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[12]  Bok-Ki Kim,et al.  Effect of rail/armature geometry on current density distribution and inductance gradient , 1999 .

[13]  Comparison Between 2-D and 3-D Electromagnetic Modeling of Railgun , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[14]  J. Gallant,et al.  Parametric study of an augmented railgun , 2003 .