Public Reports, Information Acquisition by Investors, and Management Incentives

This paper initially provides a general characterization of the relative weight assigned to two performance measures in an optimal linear compensation contract in a two-task principal/agent setting. This characterization is applied to a setting in which the measures are a public report about the firm's performance (e.g., accounting earnings) and its market price. The latter reflects the public report and non-contractible investor information, whose costly acquisition is endogenously determined. The analysis considers both the gross observed price and the filtered price, which excludes the effect of the public report and represents a contractible noisy measure of the investors' non-contractible information.

[1]  Bruce D. Grundy,et al.  Trade and the Revelation of Information through Prices and Direct Disclosure , 1989 .

[2]  Robert E. Verrecchia Information Acquisition in a Noisy Rational Expectations Economy , 1982 .

[3]  Raffi J. Indjejikian,et al.  The Impact Of Costly Information Interpretation On Firm Disclosure Decisions , 1991 .

[4]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[5]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard in Teams , 1982 .

[6]  Joel S. Demski,et al.  Market response to financial reports , 1994 .

[7]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Multitask Principal–Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design , 1991 .

[8]  Raffi J. Indjejikian,et al.  Stewardship value of `distorted' accounting disclosures , 1993 .

[9]  P. J. Hughes Risk Sharing and Valuation Under Moral Hazard , 1988 .

[10]  Anat R. Admati A Noisy Rational Expectations Equilibrium for Multi-Asset Securities Markets , 1985 .

[11]  Robert M. Bushman,et al.  Public Disclosure and the Structure of Private Information Markets , 1991 .

[12]  Raffi J. Indjejikian,et al.  Accounting income, stock price, and managerial compensation , 1993 .

[13]  Abbie J. Smith,et al.  An Empirical-Investigation Of The Relative Performance Evaluation Of Corporate-Executives , 1986 .

[14]  Robert E. Verrecchia,et al.  Information aggregation in a noisy rational expectations economy , 1981 .

[15]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Sensitivity, Precision, and Linear Aggregation of Signals for Performance Evaluation , 1989 .

[16]  M. McNichols,et al.  Public disclosure, private information collection, and short-term trading , 1994 .

[17]  S. Kothari,et al.  Measuring Delivered Performance , 1999 .

[18]  Sanford J. Grossman On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets , 1980 .

[19]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  AGGREGATION AND LINEARITY IN THE PROVISION OF INTERTEMPORAL INCENTIVES , 1987 .

[20]  Martin Hellwig,et al.  On the aggregation of information in competitive markets , 1980 .

[21]  Oliver Kim,et al.  Incentive efficiency of compensation based on accounting and market performance , 1993 .

[22]  Richard A. Lambert The use of accounting and security price measures of performance in managerial compensation contracts: A discussion , 1993 .

[23]  Kevin J. Murphy,et al.  Relative Performance Evaluation for Chief Executive Officers , 1989 .

[24]  Information content of accounting announcements , 1993 .

[25]  Srikant M. Datar,et al.  Balancing Performance Measures , 2001 .

[26]  David F. Larcker,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF ACCOUNTING AND MARKET MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE IN EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION CONTRACTS , 1987 .

[27]  Anat R. Admati,et al.  Viable allocations of information in financial markets , 1987 .

[28]  Richard G. Sloan Accounting earnings and top executive compensation , 1993 .

[29]  Firm‐specific information and efficient resource allocation* , 1988 .