The motivation for this paper is to review the status of Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA) as a general framework for examining tasks, including those for which cognitive task analysis methods might be assumed to be necessary. HTA is treated as a strategy for examining tasks, aimed at re® ning performance criteria, focusing on constituent skills, understanding task contexts and generating useful hypotheses for overcoming performance problems. A neutral and principled perspective avoids bias and enables the analyst to justify using diŒerent analytical methods and develop hypotheses as information is gained about the task. It is argued that these considerations are equally valid when examining tasks that are assumed to contain substantial cognitive elements. Moreover, examining cognition within the context of a broader task helps to situate cognition within the network of actions and decisions that it must support, as well as helping to establish where eŒort in cognitive task analysis is really justi® ed.
[1]
Robert B Miller,et al.
A METHOD FOR MAN-MACHINE TASK ANALYSIS
,
1953
.
[2]
J. C. Flanagan.
Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE
,
2022
.
[3]
K. D. Duncan,et al.
TASK ANALYSIS AND TRAINING DESIGN.
,
1967
.
[4]
A. Shepherd,et al.
An improved tabular format for task analysis
,
1976
.
[5]
Allen Newell,et al.
SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence
,
1987,
Artif. Intell..
[6]
Stephen J. Payne,et al.
Task-Action Grammars: A Model of the Mental Representation of Task Languages
,
1987,
SGCH.
[7]
Johan Kjaer-Hansen.
Unitary theories of cognitive architectures
,
1995
.