Phylogenetic trait-based analyses of ecological networks.

Ecological networks of two interacting guilds of species, such as flowering plants and pollinators, are common in nature, and studying their structure can yield insights into their resilience to environmental disturbances. Here we develop analytical methods for exploring the strengths of interactions within bipartite networks consisting of two guilds of phylogenetically related species. We then apply these methods to investigate the resilience of a plant-pollinator community to anticipated climate change. The methods allow the statistical assessment of, for example, whether closely related pollinators are more likely to visit plants with similar relative frequencies, and whether closely related pollinators tend to visit closely related plants. The methods can also incorporate trait information, allowing us to identify which plant traits are likely responsible for attracting different pollinators. These questions are important for our study of 14 prairie plants and their 22 insect pollinators. Over the last 70 years, six of the plants have advanced their flowering, while eight have not. When we experimentally forced earlier flowering times, five of the six advanced-flowering species experienced higher pollinator visitation rates, whereas only one of the eight other species had more visits; this network thus appears resilient to climate change, because those species with advanced flowering have ample pollinators earlier in the season. Using the methods developed here, we show that advanced-flowering plants did not have a distinct pollinator community from the other eight species. Furthermore, pollinator phylogeny did not explain pollinator community composition; closely related pollinators were not more likely to visit the same plant species. However, differences among pollinator communities visiting different plants were explained by plant height, floral color, and symmetry. As a result, closely related plants attracted similar numbers of pollinators. By parsing out characteristics that explain why plants share pollinators, we can identify plant species that likely share a common fate in a changing climate.

[1]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Econometrics , 1985 .

[2]  O. Gordo,et al.  Phenology and climate change: a long-term study in a Mediterranean locality , 2005, Oecologia.

[3]  D. Debinski,et al.  Butterfly, bee and forb community composition and cross-taxon incongruence in tallgrass prairie fragments , 2008, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[4]  David B. Roy,et al.  Phenology of British butterflies and climate change , 2000 .

[5]  Luciano Cagnolo,et al.  Evaluating multiple determinants of the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks. , 2009, Ecology.

[6]  Sarah Kimball.  Links between floral morphology and floral visitors along an elevational gradient in a Penstemon hybrid zone , 2008 .

[7]  Mollie E. Brooks,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[9]  Anthony R. Ives,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models for phylogenetic analyses of community structure , 2011 .

[10]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  Erratum: Phylogenies and the comparative method: A general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data (American Naturalist 149 (646-667)) , 1999 .

[11]  Peter W. McOwan,et al.  FReD: The Floral Reflectance Database — A Web Portal for Analyses of Flower Colour , 2010, PloS one.

[12]  Jeff Ollerton,et al.  Year‐to‐year variation in the topology of a plant–pollinator interaction network , 2008 .

[13]  Christopher N. Kaiser-Bunbury,et al.  Community structure of pollination webs of Mauritian heathland habitats , 2009 .

[14]  Karen C. Abbott,et al.  Evolution of plant–pollinator mutualisms in response to climate change , 2011, Evolutionary applications.

[15]  Carolina L. Morales,et al.  Invasive mutualisms and the structure of plant–pollinator interactions in the temperate forests of north‐west Patagonia, Argentina , 2006 .

[16]  Anil K. Bera,et al.  A test for normality of observations and regression residuals , 1987 .

[17]  D. Stram,et al.  Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model. , 1994, Biometrics.

[18]  T. Garland,et al.  Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 1992 .

[19]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  Phylogenies and the Comparative Method: A General Approach to Incorporating Phylogenetic Information into the Analysis of Interspecific Data , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[20]  J. Thomson,et al.  A multivariate search for pollination syndromes among penstemons , 2004 .

[21]  Ø. Totland,et al.  The relationships between floral traits and specificity of pollination systems in three Scandinavian plant communities , 2008, Oecologia.

[22]  S. R. Searle,et al.  Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models , 2005 .

[23]  Ørjan Totland,et al.  How does climate warming affect plant-pollinator interactions? , 2009, Ecology letters.

[24]  Richard B Primack,et al.  Global warming and flowering times in Thoreau's Concord: a community perspective. , 2008, Ecology.

[25]  G. Judge,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Econometrics , 1981 .

[26]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  S. Potts,et al.  The Role of Flower Inclination, Depth, and Height in the Preferences of a Pollinating Beetle (Coleoptera: Glaphyridae) , 2004, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[28]  Pat Willmer,et al.  LINKING BEES AND FLOWERS: HOW DO FLORAL COMMUNITIES STRUCTURE POLLINATOR COMMUNITIES? , 2003 .

[29]  Hannah R. Gaines,et al.  Wild bee pollinators provide the majority of crop visitation across land‐use gradients in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, USA , 2007 .

[30]  C. Yates,et al.  Composition of the pollinator community, pollination and the mating system for a shrub in fragments of species rich kwongan in south-west Western Australia , 2007, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[31]  J. Felsenstein.  Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[32]  T. Garland,et al.  Phylogenetic logistic regression for binary dependent variables. , 2010, Systematic biology.

[33]  Louise Ryan,et al.  Cholesky Residuals for Assessing Normal Errors in a Linear Model With Correlated Outcomes , 2004 .

[34]  R. Peakall,et al.  POLLINATORS DISCRIMINATE AMONG FLORAL HEIGHTS OF A SEXUALLY DECEPTIVE ORCHID: IMPLICATIONS FOR SELECTION , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  Judith L Bronstein,et al.  Mutualisms in a changing world: an evolutionary perspective. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[36]  A. Fitter,et al.  Rapid Changes in Flowering Time in British Plants , 2002, Science.

[37]  R. Boyd,et al.  CONSERVATION IMPACT OF CLIMATIC VARIABILITY ON POLLINATION OF THE FEDERALLY ENDANGERED PLANT, CLEMATIS SOCIALIS (RANUNCULACEAE) , 2003 .

[38]  Paul J. CaraDonna,et al.  Asynchronous changes in phenology of migrating Broad-tailed Hummingbirds and their early-season nectar resources. , 2012, Ecology.

[39]  Hideyuki Doi,et al.  Heterogeneous intra-annual climatic changes drive different phenological responses at two trophic levels , 2008 .

[40]  A. Ives,et al.  Effects of experimental shifts in flowering phenology on plant-pollinator interactions. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[41]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks , 2007, Nature.

[42]  A. Ives,et al.  Morphometrics of the Avian Small Intestine Compared with That of Nonflying Mammals: A Phylogenetic Approach , 2008, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[43]  J. Bosch,et al.  Flowering phenology, floral traits and pollinator composition in a herbaceous Mediterranean plant community , 1997, Oecologia.

[44]  K. Liang,et al.  Asymptotic Properties of Maximum Likelihood Estimators and Likelihood Ratio Tests under Nonstandard Conditions , 1987 .

[45]  Joseph Tzanopoulos,et al.  Long-term observation of a pollination network: fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[46]  T. Garland,et al.  TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[47]  Mark Von Tress,et al.  Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models , 2003, Technometrics.

[48]  G. Kudo,et al.  Does seed production of spring ephemerals decrease when spring comes early? , 2004, Ecological Research.

[49]  A. Ives,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Trophic Associations , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[50]  M. V. Price,et al.  A global test of the pollination syndrome hypothesis. , 2009, Annals of botany.

[51]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[52]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Effects of climatic change on the phenology of butterflies in the northwest Mediterranean Basin , 2003 .

[53]  N. L. Bradley,et al.  Phenological changes reflect climate change in Wisconsin. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.