Artificial intelligence as digital agency

Over the last few years, the European Journal of Information Systems (EJIS) has gone through substantial changes (Agerfalk, 2018). What, then, could be more appropriate than to set 2020 off on the ...

[1]  Lars Nyre,et al.  The mediated construction of reality , 2018, New Media Soc..

[2]  Lotta Hultin,et al.  Visualizing institutional logics in sociomaterial practices , 2014, Inf. Organ..

[3]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  The digital platform: a research agenda , 2018, J. Inf. Technol..

[4]  Bruce G. Buchanan,et al.  A (Very) Brief History of Artificial Intelligence , 2005, AI Mag..

[5]  Pär J. Ågerfalk.  Insufficient theoretical contribution: a conclusive rationale for rejection? , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Mike Ananny,et al.  Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability , 2018, New Media Soc..

[7]  Dov Te'eni.  Current issue and future submissions, contextualized , 2015, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[9]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards , 1997 .

[10]  Spyros Makridakis,et al.  The Forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) Revolution: Its Impact on Society and Firms , 2017 .

[11]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Transforming Decision-Making Processes Transforming decision-making processes : a research agenda for understanding the impact of business analytics on organizations , 2017 .

[12]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[13]  Roger H. L. Chiang,et al.  Big Data Research in Information Systems: Toward an Inclusive Research Agenda , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  Computational sustainability , 2011, AI Mag..

[15]  Saonee Sarker,et al.  Next generation digital platforms : toward human-AI hybrids , 2019 .

[16]  John R. Searle,et al.  Social ontology , 2006 .

[17]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[18]  D. Avison,et al.  Scoping the Discipline of Information Systems 1 , 2006 .

[19]  G. Poggi.  Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology , 1969 .

[20]  Ole Hanseth,et al.  From Systems and Tools to Networks and Infrastructures-from Design to Cultivation: Towards a Design Theory of Information Infrastructures , 2010 .

[21]  H. Garfinkel.  Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[22]  Steven L. Alter.  Defining information systems as work systems: implications for the IS field , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[23]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[24]  Paul Johannesson,et al.  Institutional ontology for conceptual modeling , 2018, J. Inf. Technol..

[25]  Stefan Seidel,et al.  Stimulating dialog between information systems research and practice , 2017, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Information Systems Education: Recommendations and Implementation , 1987 .

[27]  Shoshana Zuboff.  The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power , 2019 .

[28]  Pairin Katerattanakul,et al.  Is information systems a reference discipline? , 2006, CACM.

[29]  Tony Doyle,et al.  Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy , 2017, Inf. Soc..

[30]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  IT Artifacts as Socio-Pragmatic Instruments: Reconciling the Pragmatic, Semiotic, and Technical , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact..

[31]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  Towards a greater diversity in writing styles, argumentative strategies and genre of manuscripts , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  Review: A Cognitive-Affective Model of Organizational Communication for Designing IT , 2001, MIS Q..

[33]  Dov Te 'eni.  : A COGNITIVE-AFFECTIVE MODEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL COMMUNICATION FOR DESIGNING IT , 2001 .

[34]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Action-oriented conceptual modelling , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Nicholas Diakopoulos,et al.  Algorithmic Accountability , 2015 .

[36]  Ray J. Paul,et al.  Loose Change , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[37]  J ÅgerfalkPär,et al.  Action-oriented conceptual modelling , 2004 .

[38]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[39]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Digital First: The Ontological Reversal and New Challenges for IS Research , 2019 .

[40]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Exploring the intellectual structures of information systems development: A social action theoretic analysis , 1996 .

[41]  Dov Te'eni.  The language-action perspective as a basis for communication support systems , 2006, CACM.

[42]  Kecheng Liu,et al.  Understanding the roles of signs and norms in organizations - a semiotic approach to information systems design , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[43]  W. Orlikowski.  Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[44]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Symbolic Action Research in Information Systems: Introduction to the Special Issue , 2014, MIS Q..

[45]  Pär J. Ågerfalk.  Getting pragmatic , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[46]  B. Latour.  Technology is Society Made Durable , 1990 .

[47]  Kai-Fu Lee.  AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order , 2018 .

[48]  Paul Beynon-Davies,et al.  Instituting facts: Data structures and institutional order , 2016, Inf. Organ..

[49]  Federico Iannacci,et al.  When is an information infrastructure? Investigating the emergence of public sector information infrastructures , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  The Contingent Impact of Contextualization on Computer-Mediated Collaboration , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[51]  Andreas Reckwitz.  Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[52]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Collaborative Practice Research , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  Agency and Institutions in Organization Studies , 2017 .

[54]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  Toward a richer diversity of genres in information systems research: new categorization and guidelines , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[55]  Mark Johnson.  Going through the changes , 1985, Nature.

[56]  David E. Avison,et al.  Information systems and anthropology: and anthropological perspective on IT and organizational culture , 1995, Inf. Technol. People.

[57]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Sowing the seeds of self: a socio-pragmatic penetration of the web artefact , 2007, ICPW '07.

[58]  S. L. Star,et al.  This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept , 2010 .

[59]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[60]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[61]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Investigating actability dimensions: a language/action perspective on criteria for information systems evaluation , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[62]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Conceptualizing business-to-thing interactions – A sociomaterial perspective on the Internet of Things , 2017, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[63]  J ÅgerfalkPär,et al.  Symbolic action research in information systems , 2014 .

[64]  James A. Hendler,et al.  Information accountability , 2008, CACM.

[65]  Mohan S. Kankanhalli,et al.  Trends and Trajectories for Explainable, Accountable and Intelligible Systems: An HCI Research Agenda , 2018, CHI.

[66]  John F. Rockart,et al.  Editor’s comments , 2005, MIS Q. Executive.